A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Forces surround mass



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 2nd 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,sci.physics.particle
xxein1@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default Forces surround mass

On Jul 1, 12:01*am, BURT wrote:
On Jun 30, wrote:





On Jun 30, wrote:


On Jun 30, 7:21*pm, Mad Ape wrote:


BURT wrote:
On Jun 30, 11:37 am, Conny Heller wrote:
BURT schrieb:


What else is there?
Space.


Forces surround mass in the space.


You should not also forget time.


Mitch Raemsch


Dark matter? Does is matter?


The Mad Apewww.tatumba.com


xxein: *There is no need for dark matter. *Despite the evidence given
for it, there is strong evidence that the theoretical framework that
seems to need it is very flawed.


We have yet to find anything close to the actual physic, but I'm
getting warmer. *Trying to understanding the actual physic is fun.
More people should try it sometime rather than just grabbing onto
beliefs and trying to make their round belief fit into a square hole.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


xxein: *I have to change that to a more appropriate "square belief
into a round hole". *Reality and the physic is spherical.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


a round physic. Even the 4th dimension.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


xxein: Yes. Time can only provide curlicues depending on where the
clock we use is and how it may change position.

It is called subjective measurement. I've harping on this for a long
time. It seems as though no one gets it.

Ads
  #13  
Old July 2nd 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,sci.physics.particle
mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,849
Default Forces surround mass

On Jul 1, 2:13*pm, wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:01*am, BURT wrote:





On Jun 30, wrote:


On Jun 30, wrote:


On Jun 30, 7:21*pm, Mad Ape wrote:


BURT wrote:
On Jun 30, 11:37 am, Conny Heller wrote:
BURT schrieb:


What else is there?
Space.


Forces surround mass in the space.


You should not also forget time.


Mitch Raemsch


Dark matter? Does is matter?


The Mad Apewww.tatumba.com


xxein: *There is no need for dark matter. *Despite the evidence given
for it, there is strong evidence that the theoretical framework that
seems to need it is very flawed.


We have yet to find anything close to the actual physic, but I'm
getting warmer. *Trying to understanding the actual physic is fun..
More people should try it sometime rather than just grabbing onto
beliefs and trying to make their round belief fit into a square hole.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


xxein: *I have to change that to a more appropriate "square belief
into a round hole". *Reality and the physic is spherical.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


a round physic. Even the 4th dimension.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


xxein: *Yes. *Time can only provide curlicues depending on where the
clock we use is and how it may change position.

It is called subjective measurement. *I've harping on this for a long
time. *It seems as though no one gets it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Time is the only thing that doesn't have a shape.

Mitch Raemsch
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forces surround mass BURT Physics - General Discussion 8 July 1st 08 12:51 PM
NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !! Y.Porat The Theory of Relativity 338 June 11th 06 05:36 PM
NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !! Y.Porat Physics - General Discussion 337 June 9th 06 08:21 PM
NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !! Y.Porat Particle Physics 322 June 9th 06 04:21 PM
NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !! brian a m stuckless Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 0 May 31st 06 04:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Online Loans - Free phpBB forum - Proxy - Secured Loans - Cheap Loan