On Jul 4, 1:12 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jul 3, 10:59 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Your imagination remains your imagination. shrug

Because if it weren't, it wouldn't be.

That is what is called a farce. shrug

Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. There is nothing
that I can gain from Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar. shrug

Other than as a platform to being relevant - even if it is in a small
recess of the internet that only laughs at you when it isn't ignoring
you.

Well, at least I got more stars (one, two, three...) from anyone
else. shrug

Still that's more attention than you usually get - do your
children or grandchildren ever call you anymore?

My children still call me ‘daddy’. shrug

I have no way to predict what my grand children would call me, but
‘grandpa’ is a likely bet. shrug

Oh, so you have *no* emotional investment in Einstein?

That is very correct.

Even though you
have spent several years defaming and generally lying your ass off
about him personally and professionally?

What lies? Einstein being a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar is no
lie. shrug

I think people who act like that are called sociopaths.

I think people like yourself who denies the truth are called
ignorant. shrug

The choices here are "sociopath" or "liar". Which are you?

Neither. shrug

Well, there is nothing to capitalize on Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar. shrug

Other than the attention you get by making the claims.

Einstein being a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar is the truth when
discussing about Einstein. shrug

A little ignorance [GR is not based on 'gages'] combined with a whole
lot of arrogance does not an argument make. YOU might not think
curvature is valid in any meaningful sense, but that isn't for you to
decide.

Yes, the group decision is laughable. shrug

Again - who are you to make that call? You are unable to demonstrate
competence in the tools you criticize.

This is because I do not see the emperor’s clothes as everyone is peer-
pressured into claiming so. shrug

Hey, this is a public newsgroup discussion, is it not? Why are you so
devastated? You must be taking this very personally. shrug

I'm more devastated that my cheap gungzhao chinese **** fireworks
don't work worth a damn.

So, you are racist again the Chinese among many other groups.

I'm sure the roll of black cats will make up
the difference though!

How is that?

Actually I'm more devastated that my legs are covered in mosquito
bites.

It is understandable. At least, your private part did not get chewed
up by fleas. Now, that is something for you to avoid sitting on
certain grass at all cost. shrug

Little ****ers are out for blood tonight.

Try the ancient incent stuff. That seems to work very well whenever I
go out backpacking.

You need to concentrating on getting your degree first before you can
criticizing others.

Multitasking, kooby! Multitasking!

Yes, we all do in real life. shrug

Not just a feature of a modern operating system anymore!

That is a bad analogy. All you need is one operating system to run a
program. shrug

Yes, GR is based on Riemannian geometry, but it is mis-applied. Let’s
try this again. The geometry must be invariant. To describe the
invariant geometry, the metric must vary with the choice of coordinate
system. Thus, the metric cannot be a tensor.

How do you expect an actual discussion of the subject in question when
you can't even use the terms right despite several years of
corrections?

That is because you do not understand the subject. shrug

The phrase "the geometry must be invariant" has no
meaning to anyone but yourself and those who have the kooby--GR
dictionary.

So, the contra argument that you are embracing is that the actual
geometry must vary in accordance to each observation. That means you
embrace the darkside of art. You must think yourself to be a
warlock. shrug

Your whining touches on a larger scale of ignorance than you have yet
mentioned. Evaluate the good ol' metric tensor in Euclidean geometry
for Cartesian and then spherical coordinates. What's the difference?
NOTHING. You haven't managed to explain your way past that simple
SIMPLE example since I started bringing it up in when...2006?

We have discussed this before. Given an identify metric in 3
dimensional space does not mean space is flat. On the other hand,
given a non-diagonal metric does not mean space is curved. You still
have to take the choice of coordinate system into account. shrug

If you call the geodesic equations as part of GR, then yes part of GR
is based on the Lagrangian method. However, since geodesic equations
preceded GR by many decades, I would not claim the geodesic equations
as part of GR. GR is only limited to the field equations.

So you think GR isn't related to Riemannian geometry even though the
Einstein-Hilbert action is proportional to the Ricci scalar?

That depends on how you want to draw an umbrella to include GR.
shrug

Or do you
still reject the Einstein-Hilbert action on some arbitrary and
capricious basis as per usual?

The Einstein-Hilbert action is absolutely nonsense. shrug

Your accusation is cheap. shrug

Then prove me wrong.

Already done that in these discussions we had. shrug

Again - the Euclidean metric in spherical coordinates is ds^2 = dr^2 +
r^2 [d\theta^2 + sin(\theta)^2 d\phi^2]. Prove that the surface area
of a sphere in this specific metric is 4 pi r^2. Its' like 8 lines of
math, why are you afraid of proving me wrong with 8 lines of near-
trivial calculus?

I had done that. shrug

You are not able to fill in the steps between writing the Euclidean
metric in spherical coordinates and writing "the surface area of a
sphere is 4 pi r^2".

You are still barking up the wrong tree. shrug

Since you like to harp on me being in school, I'll relay a relevant
example. If you are assigned a problem and you simply write down what
you think the answer is, you will get zero points whether it is right
or not.

Your assignment to me of a problem is absolutely ridiculous. shrug

Did I say something wrong? Are you not a multi-year super senior
without a BA/BS degree still?

Keep on firing, kooby. I'll discuss my personal life with you when you
stop posting under a pseudonym and join in the discussion under equal
terms.

Please keep your personal life or lack of it to yourself. I do not
want to know how badly your private part is chewed up by mosquitoes.
shrug

Daydreaming about disposing your opponent is sometimes very healthy
fro your mind especially after your *ss has been kicked so badly by
your opponent. shrug

You are hallucinating. I blame whatever drugs you are on.

Which drug is that?

Keep guessing. Are you helping Professor Draper to find out which
university gave me all these degrees? I would very much to be there
when you guys register a complaint about that institution awarding me
these degrees. Don’t forget to tell them that you got your *sses
kicked so badly in these newsgroup discussions that you are supposed
to know the subjects well. Ahahahaha...

Whether or not you actually have them is irrelevant at this point
because you do not have access to that knowledge. You are unable to
display competence in even basic calculus, much less the complicated
subjects you routinely rant about.

Keep bitching. shrug

On Jul 4, 12:43 am, "Androcles" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message

| Denying the Aether is accepting Voodooism in physics.

You are a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug (plagiarised)

Your accusation is cheap. shrug

| After all, it
| has been observed how light propagates for several hundred years
| already. Have you been hiding under a rock some where in England?

Accepting aether is accepting voodooism in technology.

Well, that is how the mathematics of electromagnetism tells you.
shrug

After all,
it has been observed that ring laser gyroscopes work and would
not do so if your stupid aether were present. shrug (plagiarised)

So, you do not understand how the Aether would behave even with all
these textbooks explaining how electromagnetism works. shrug

Therefore for someone that can understand GPS but cannot understand
how another piece of common technology works you have to be
utterly stupid, a pig-headed nitwit just like Roberts. shrug (plagiarised)

You are ranting now. shrug

After all, it has been observed how light propagates for several hundred
years already and there is no aether. shrug (plagiarised)

You are merely ignorant. shrug

Rather than hiding under a rock, you have your stupid head up your arse
just like Roberts and refuse to recognise Sagnac, you ****ing ignorant
nitwit shaman. shrug (plagiarised)

How is that possible? You are utterly delusional in your ignorance.
shrug

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...gnacIdiocy.htm

Androcles’ website is mostly junk except my GPS write-up. shrug

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Jul 4, 12:43 am, "Androcles" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message

| Denying the Aether is accepting Voodooism in physics.

You are a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug (plagiarised)

Your accusation is cheap. shrug
=========================
Yes, as you should know. shrug




| After all, it
| has been observed how light propagates for several hundred years
| already. Have you been hiding under a rock some where in England?

Accepting aether is accepting voodooism in technology.

Well, that is how the mathematics of electromagnetism tells you.
shrug

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liar. Faraday's E = -dB/dt doesn't say anything about aether.
Shrug that up your arse.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




After all,
it has been observed that ring laser gyroscopes work and would
not do so if your stupid aether were present. shrug (plagiarised)

So, you do not understand how the Aether would behave even with all
these textbooks explaining how electromagnetism works. shrug
==============================================

So you a nitwit that plagiarises text books. shrug


Therefore for someone that can understand GPS but cannot understand
how another piece of common technology works you have to be
utterly stupid, a pig-headed nitwit just like Roberts. shrug
(plagiarised)

You are ranting now. shrug
===========================================
So you are a liar. shrug





After all, it has been observed how light propagates for several hundred
years already and there is no aether. shrug (plagiarised)

You are merely ignorant. shrug
===========================
You are merely a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug



Rather than hiding under a rock, you have your stupid head up your arse
just like Roberts and refuse to recognise Sagnac, you ****ing ignorant
nitwit shaman. shrug (plagiarised)

How is that possible?
================

You tell me, you can only hand-wave as you refuse to accept the evidence.
shrug
=======================================

You are utterly delusional in your ignorance.
shrug
=====================================
You are utterly a ****headed nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...gnacIdiocy.htm

Androcles’ website is mostly junk except my GPS write-up. shrug
=====================================

Oh... you mean where you wrote "Androcles is correct" before you became
a ****headed nitwit?