Having just beamed by for a visit, I noticed the kook algebra still
contains the same well-defined operators. Before reviewing those, I'd
like to single out Dirk for special recognition in archiving the Best
of the Insane in his Immortal Fumbles. Thanks Dirk. Some people think
I'm making this stuff up. And now on to the operators for the algebra
of this group. In no particular order of demerit:

The Einstein Hoax bot: What can I say? Even brain death doesn't slow
some folks down.

PMB: Still trying to overthrow over 50 of years of understanding with
his usenet appeals for relativistic mass. Just break down and publish
in a reputable journal like Galilean Electrodynamics. And speaking
of...

Ken Seto: What's the Frequency Kenneth?

Ken Tucker: How do you say ``What's the Frequency Kenneth'' in Word
Salad? Check with the Other Ken. I see a Model Mechanics collaboration
on the horizon that will make Model Mechanics less intelligible than
it already is.

Pentcho Valev: Folks in the Eastern Bloc countries got a reprieve.
You can stop toeing the party line now and think for yourself. Well,
maybe not. Nevermind.

John Schoenfelch: Self explanatory.

Shubee: How's the fan club? Yes, deep down we all really do believe
it's elegant to reformulate relativity badly using weird ideas that
twist and turn through 10 times the number of lines required to derive
the same formulae in a convincing and pedagogical way from intuitive,
physical assumptions. But, I'm more pragmatic.. Life is too short to
waste on unnecessary delusional thinking when there is beer to drink
and women to boink. Keep up the good work. I''l pay for my sins
later.

greysky: Hey - Thanks for the faster than light radio. Now I know what
not read before you post it. Slow down some though. Madame Cleo from
the Psychic Network predicted my future Inbox is full.

I see a few notable kooks have disappeared. I won't mntion them lest
they return. Finally, a number of kooks in waiting still aren't up to
snuff: Sorry Mitch, but changing your name (again) to BURT all in caps
just isn't a good reason to promote you to full fledged Kook from the
pool garden variety Swill. To move up, you also need to stop relying
on massive postings of the same misconceptions to get people's
attention and put some effort into getting as many misconceptions as
possible into fewer but more incoherent posts. Spirit of Truth is just
too obvious a contradiction from the posted conted to qualify as a
creative self-parody. Keep trying though.


Cheers,
A. Nony Mouse

wrote in message
...

PMB: Still trying to overthrow over 50 of years of understanding with
his usenet appeals for relativistic mass.

I'm not interested in usenet appeals. I only mention it here because the
subject comes up quite often. And people here have a poor understanding of
the subject. I'm not overthrowing 50 years of understanding. In fact I'm
arguing that those 50 years of understanding is correct in that during those
years people were often doing things right. Then again you should know that
and you must therefore be trolling. Thanks for letting me know. I'm
reconstructing my killfile and need to determine who get on it.
Congradulations. You made the *cut*.

I recommend that you spend your exile in killfile-land and read more about
relativistic mass. Please start with "Gravitation," by Misner, Thorne and
Wheeler,W.H. Freeman & Co., (1973), page 141. REad the part where it gives
the proof that stress-energy tensor is symmetric. Try to understand what the
terminology means. Learn what the authors (MTW) mean when they state "They
must be equal because energy = mass ("E = Mc2 = M")"

Later flammer

On Jun 26, 5:56 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
wrote in message

...

PMB: Still trying to overthrow over 50 of years of understanding with
his usenet appeals for relativistic mass.

I'm not interested in usenet appeals. I only mention it here because the
subject comes up quite often. And people here have a poor understanding of
the subject. I'm not overthrowing 50 years of understanding. In fact I'm
arguing that those 50 years of understanding is correct in that during those
years people were often doing things right. Then again you should know that
and you must therefore be trolling. Thanks for letting me know. I'm
reconstructing my killfile and need to determine who get on it.
Congradulations. You made the *cut*.

I recommend that you spend your exile in killfile-land and read more about
relativistic mass. Please start with "Gravitation," by Misner, Thorne and
Wheeler,W.H. Freeman & Co., (1973), page 141. REad the part where it gives
the proof that stress-energy tensor is symmetric. Try to understand what the
terminology means. Learn what the authors (MTW) mean when they state "They
must be equal because energy = mass ("E = Mc2 = M")"

Later flammer

Thanks for checking in. I should mention, (and I really hate to
belabor the obvous) but you already read the post, and killfiles don't
work retroactively. Anyway, I'm sorry there isn't a prize for being
first., but at least you (possibly) won't be next.