No. I don't think so.

"I want to know how God created this universe. All the rest are just
details." Albert Einstein

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

No. I don't think

Trimmed for brevity and accuracy

wrote in news:75e67a00-86f5-4a77-af88-
:

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/index.html disagrees with you.

--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA




"The fool says in his heart: 'There is no God.' The Wise Man says it to the
world."
Troy Witte

On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

No. I don't think so.


If "God" did exist, then proof would be essential. Putting faith
in an undetectable entity is shear foolishness and a waste of
time and effort.


"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

On May 26, 8:24*pm, John Locke wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
No. I don't think so.

If "God" did exist, then proof would be essential. *Putting faith
in an undetectable entity is shear foolishness and a waste of
time and effort.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

Sagan was a fool to think that he grasped more than a whisp.

On Mon, 26 May 2008 21:29:57 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 26, 8:24*pm, John Locke wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
No. I don't think so.

If "God" did exist, then proof would be essential. *Putting faith
in an undetectable entity is shear foolishness and a waste of
time and effort.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

Sagan was a fool to think that he grasped more than a whisp.

Who claims that he thought otherwise? Please tell me you can't be
retarded enough to think (or dishonest enough to insinuate) that the
quote you're criticizing indicates anything other than a willingness
to accept evidence, and modify one's world-view accordingly.

On May 26, 10:20 pm, wrote:
No. I don't think so.


Then do I have to believe in his existence?
No, I don't think so, asshole.

PDW

On May 27, 12:29 am, wrote:
On May 26, 8:24 pm, John Locke wrote:

On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
No. I don't think so.

If "God" did exist, then proof would be essential. Putting faith
in an undetectable entity is shear foolishness and a waste of
time and effort.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

Sagan was a fool to think that he grasped more than a whisp.

Sagan was very much aware of how little he, along with the rest of the
human race, understood about the universe, thank you very much.

The amount he understood was still magnitudes greater than what you
understand.

:

No. I don't think so.

Does the heavenly sadist jehoover exist at all? I know it does not.

Case closed.

--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...

My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus

skrev i en meddelelse
...
On May 26, 8:24 pm, John Locke wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
No. I don't think so.

If "God" did exist, then proof would be essential. Putting faith
in an undetectable entity is shear foolishness and a waste of
time and effort.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe
as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

Sagan was a fool to think that he grasped more than a whisp.

Since he did not think that, and since it is the theists who think they know
"The Truth"; you are the fool - as well as a liar.