Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval. This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

Your motion cannot change the geometry of the universe. Just as there
are no flat atoms there is no flattened universe. These predictions
show a failing physics. The physics of flat atoms and a flat universe
is the proof of the failure of space contraction theory. What is
provable is time slowdown by Gamma.

Distances are absolute. Take the AU as an example.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

wrote:

Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval. This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Spacetime is locally Lorentzian. Velocities do not add.

Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

Spacetime is not absolute as has been established many times by experiment.



Your motion cannot change the geometry of the universe. Just as there
are no flat atoms there is no flattened universe. These predictions
show a failing physics. The physics of flat atoms and a flat universe
is the proof of the failure of space contraction theory. What is
provable is time slowdown by Gamma.

Physics is such a failure that it has produced the computer and
communication net (compliete with fiber optics) on which you spew your
nonsense.

You sir, are a Crank

Yoda says: Use the Force. Believe the Experiments.

Bob Kolker

On May 14, 1:39*am, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote:
wrote:
Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval. This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Spacetime is locally Lorentzian. Velocities do not add.



Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

Spacetime is not absolute as has been established many times by experiment..



Your motion cannot change the geometry of the universe. Just as there
are no flat atoms there is no flattened universe. These predictions
show a failing physics. The physics of flat atoms and a flat universe
is the proof of the failure of space contraction theory. What is
provable is time slowdown by Gamma.

Physics is such a failure that it has produced the computer and
communication net (compliete with fiber optics) on which you spew your
nonsense.

You sir, are a Crank

Yoda says: Use the Force. Believe the Experiments.

Bob Kolker

There is no experiment for space contraction. It doesn't happen.

Mitch Raemsch

On May 13, 10:04*pm, wrote:
Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval.

That statement is inconsistent with experiment.

This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Theories that are inconsistent with experiment are chucked on their
ear. Nice try, though. It always helps to capitalize the words and add
"Theory" at the end when you take a stab in the dark. That strategy is
called Empty Skull Theory.


Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

This must be your third Nobel. Just a week or so ago you were
insisting that atoms were flat and two-dimensional. Today you say
there are no such things. That must be Where Am I Theory.


Your motion cannot change the geometry of the universe. Just as there
are no flat atoms there is no flattened universe. These predictions
show a failing physics. The physics of flat atoms and a flat universe
is the proof of the failure of space contraction theory.

You must mean Space Contraction Theory.

What is
provable is time slowdown by Gamma.

Distances are absolute. Take the AU as an example.

Or the meter. That would be very similar to Henri Wilson's If I Can
Define a Meter Then It's Absolute Theory.

Or maybe Wipe The Foam Off My Chin Theory.


Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On May 14, 4:55*am, wrote:
On May 14, 1:39*am, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote:



wrote:
Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval. This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Spacetime is locally Lorentzian. Velocities do not add.

Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

Spacetime is not absolute as has been established many times by experiment.

On May 13, 11:04*pm, wrote:
Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval. This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Space is absolute. There is no space contraction and it is provable.
There are NO FLAT ATOMS.

Your motion cannot change the geometry of the universe. Just as there
are no flat atoms there is no flattened universe. These predictions
show a failing physics. The physics of flat atoms and a flat universe
is the proof of the failure of space contraction theory. What is
provable is time slowdown by Gamma.

Distances are absolute. Take the AU as an example.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

this theory is so compelling that we must turn our back on the
universe which stubbornly refuses to conform to it.

On May 14, 6:13*am, PD wrote:

This is Closing
Velocity Theory.

Theories that are inconsistent with experiment are chucked on their
ear. Nice try, though. It always helps to capitalize the words and add
"Theory" at the end when you take a stab in the dark. That strategy is
called Empty Skull Theory.


"As you approach a certain Velocity, all ze Closing vill be ripped
from your body by ze vind"

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

You are at the bottom of the stooopid hole.

http://www.buzzle.com/img/articleImages/131617-26.jpg


1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.

Look in the mirror Uncle Alice

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

You are at the bottom of the stooopid hole.

http://www.buzzle.com/img/articleImages/131617-26.jpg


1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.

Look in the mirror Uncle Alice

On May 14, 2:13*am, PD wrote:
On May 13, 10:04*pm, wrote:

Let us say we are moving behind light at 99%. Light itself will travel
only 1% further in space in any given interval.

That statement is inconsistent with experiment.

Please elaborate.

As I see it it is pretty simple. Light will only move through space a
little bit above matter's 99% motion behind it.