Dear Newsgroup:

I have no doubt that because of events of the Second World War; they
have made a scientific monster in physics, out of an ordinary person
like Einstein (i.e. highly magnifying and glorifying him).

This is because to cover negative images of events like Holocaust.

Well, OK, he made a revolution in physics, fine, but I have done it in
mathematics.

Possibly NEW EXACT MATH will be several times more powerful than
relativity.

But, once you want to bring Einstein into domain of debate, like E = m
c^2 and Riccati, or even I talk about my math, they behave as if a
thunderstorm hit the ground!

I suppose highly magnifying and glorifying a person like Einstein
(because of his social, political and historical past); will reflect
negatively on any sound and logical scientific debate about
relativity.

This is because an unnatural injection and stimulating feelings (about
a scientific event) will eventually result in a negative reaction. The
solution is to behave naturally.

This is also true about many other similar scientists in our
institutions.

Dr.M.Basti

wrote:
I have no doubt that because of events of the Second World War; they
have made a scientific monster in physics, out of an ordinary person
like Einstein (i.e. highly magnifying and glorifying him).

Your understanding of history is ATROCIOUS! Einstein became famous
almost overnight in 1919, and by the early 1920s was a celebrity when he
toured the U.S. The second world war did not kick off until 1938-39
(depending on what you consider to be the "kick off"). Yes, the dearth
of the war years probably had much to do with his glorification (the
FIRST world war).

Your understanding of how mathematics is done appears to be similarly
atrocious. If you truly had "made a revolution in mathematics" then you
would have no difficulty publishing it in mathematical journals.


Tom Roberts

On May 12, 8:22*pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
wrote:
I have no doubt that because of events of the Second World War; they
have made a scientific monster in physics, out of an ordinary person
like Einstein (i.e. highly magnifying and glorifying him).

Your understanding of history is ATROCIOUS! Einstein became famous
almost overnight in 1919, and by the early 1920s was a celebrity when he
toured the U.S. The second world war did not kick off until 1938-39
(depending on what you consider to be the "kick off"). Yes, the dearth
of the war years probably had much to do with his glorification (the
FIRST world war).

Your understanding of how mathematics is done appears to be similarly
atrocious. If you truly had "made a revolution in mathematics" then you
would have no difficulty publishing it in mathematical journals.

Tom Roberts

xxein: What's with all the math? We know math. What we don't know
is the physic.

Please get a clue about the difference between measuring using a
physics and the physic itself.

You have espoused this before. Did you forget or just get mesmerised?