A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

PRIVATE PHYSICS 9



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
karamihas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9


PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

First part, the most insignificant part:
The new theory of relativity. The scalable relativity, the relative
relativity.

M = m / {1– [ (C^2 – v^2) / C^2] }^0.5 (1)

s = S {1– [ (C^2 – v^2) / C^2] }^0.5 (2)

T = t / {1– [ (C^2 – v^2) / C^2] }^0.5 (3)

M = Planck’s mass, or unification’s mass = 54,5625x10^-6 gr.
m = quantum of mass = hn/C^2 = 7,37x10^-48gr.
s = 4,0508x10^-33 cm. S = 2,9979245x10^10 cm. T = one sec.
t = 1,3512035x10^-43 sec. C = light speed,
v = the quantum of speed = 4,0508x10^-33 cm/sec,
or v is the gravitational speed, which corresponds to the quantum of
mass m,
to the length S and to the time T

The above equations show that the change in the measure of an entity
does not depend solely on the speed of the entity. It also depends on
the entity’s gravitational speed, which can not be missing from the
relativistic equations. Since the gravitational speed is missing from
Einstein’s equations, his relativity has such relation with the
reality as had his head with the barbershop.

From (1) we take

M^2 = m^2 C^2 /v^2 Substituting v^2 for Gm/S we take

M^2G = mC^2 S (4)

but C^2 = S^2/T^2

where S = 2,9979245x10^10 cm and T = one sec.

Substituting in equation (4) we take

M^2G = m S^2/T^2 x S = mS^2/T x S/T (5)

But mS^2/T = h and S/T = C

substituting in (5) we take the equation

M^2G = hC or M = (hC/G)^0.5 So we have

M = (hC/G)^0.5 = m / {1– [(C^2–v^2) /C^2] }^0.5 (6)

With similar thoughts from equation (2) we end up to the equations

s = (Gh/C^3)^0.5 = S {1–[(C^2–v^2)/C^2] }^0.5 (7)

And from equation (3) we end up to the equations

t = (Gh / C^5)^0.5 = T {1– [ (C^2–v^2) /C^2] }^0,5 (8)

What is the incense for the devil are the above equations for
Einstein.
To accept Einstein’s relativity after the publication of the above
equations and the inaccurate measurements in the experiments, means
that you accept that the earth is flat, after measurements made on the
curvature which has the small square in my village Geraki of Sparta.

The disgusted mounopana which you call scientific journals, since they
claim that they make peer review to the theories, why they did not
have the cleverness to juxtapose these equations to Einstein? Because
they are stupid, they publish stupidities to make you stupid. If you
don’t make them go bankrupt I shall give you ena boutso, not my secret
discoveries. Take them from these dirty mounopana, which you pay to
stupefy you.

Now lets we suppose that we have the particle m = 47,502235x10^-6 gr.
The gravitational speed of this particle is V = 2,61x10^10 cm/sec.
If this particle is moving with its gravitational speed, then its mass-
change due to speed, is given by the equation

m = m / {1 – [ (V^2 – V^2) / C^2 ] }^0.5
9

From this, we see with astonishment that, when a particle is moving
with its gravitational speed, no change occurs in its inertial mass.
If Einstein heard that, he should go nuts. When we hear it we go
devils in cleverness when we see that there is no relativity for an
entity, which is moving with its gravitational speed. Relativity is
relative, very relative.

As wrong is an opponent of relativity, who denies a particle’s mass-
change due to speed, so wrong is a proponent of relativity, who
accepts it for an entity which is moving with its gravitational
speed.

Because the gravitational speed of Planck’s mass M is C, that is why
when this particle is moving with the light-speed C, the equation
which gives its mass-change due to speed C is

M = M / {1– [(C^2–C^2) /C^2] }^0.5 10

The Planck’s mass M, I call it also unification’s particle M.

Here again we see that this particle, does not obtain infinite
inertial mass, when moving with C but it remains stable and unchanged,
disputing Einstein and obliterating his theory, as it concerns its
validity about particles moving with their gravitational speed. The
strange thing we had never imagined is that, in particular for
unification’s particle M, relativity holds in a different way. As it
is shown in my book, the critical mass of unification’s particle M,
changes only when it is moving with speed less than C, which is this
particle’s interwoven gravitational speed. In this case, its mass
changes downwards and takes the value which corresponds to the speed
it is moving with. Or, to say it with different words, the downwards
changing mass of unification’s particle M, has as gravitational speed,
the speed which it is already moving with. One of the revolutionary
conclusions about unification’s particle M is that, what ever its
speed is, the mass of the unificatiom’s particle M varies according to
its speed in such a way, so that it always travels at its
gravitational speed. With the new relativity, the unification’s mass M
becomes the critical mass for the bomb I put in Einstein’s relativity
and in whole physics.

We shall see these thoughts and the corresponding equations with more
details in my book chapter 21 which has the title: «Is it likely that
the usual particles originate from retarded unification’s particles
M?» Ask the disgusted mules of cambridge to give you the answer. Do
you really need mule’s answer? The mules vomit stupidities about the
garbage called standard model. Mules are mules and they can’t help to
show their disgusted muleness. Humans are humans, they can’t help to
show the less of the property to be human by the above equations.
I challenge the disgusted mules to disprove them. Why they don’t do
it?

Evangelos Karamihas

Athens

Pseudostate of Skatogreece

www.karamihas.gr


In the pseudostate of skatogreece, the stupid greeks, who became proud
for wasting billions in the pockets of the olympic crooks, now they
are proud for the second time. You know why? They are proud because
for months they were eating motor oil, which they thought it was olive
oil. After they consumed some thousand tons of motor oil, the
pseudogovernment of skatogreece announced that they are searching to
find the frauds, who of course are the members of the pseudogovernment
of skatogreece. Idiots, come to skatogreece. They will feed you with
**** as they tried to do to Putin. The men of his bodyguard found that
in the most luxurious restaurants of Athens the meat was rotten.
Finally he bought fresh fish from the market and let it be cooked by
his men. Come in skatogreece idiots. You can order salat with many
varieties of oil. Mobil oil, Esso oil, Texaco oil, BP oil, outboard
oil. They have any kind of motor oil for your refined taste. I wonder
how many tons you have eaten. Come here mules, come to skatogreece
idiots. Come to the apopatos of the planet, which you tolorate to
exist.
Ads
  #2  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dono
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,449
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

On May 10, 6:49 pm, karamihas wrote:

http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif

  #3  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_1220_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

"Dono" wrote in message
...
On May 10, 6:49 pm, karamihas
wrote:

http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif


Did you say "troll"?

http://www.theage.com.au/ffxImage/ur.../1211ww6,0.jpg
http://www.feuerwher.de/forum/feuerwehr_forum_troll.jpg
http://lolpresident.com/wp-content/u...07/05/nose.PNG
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/...le_gasmask.jpg
http://www.myteespot.com/images/Images_d/d_7431.jpg
http://icanhascheezburger.files.word...nd-thought.jpg
http://arcadia.dk/images/01.jpg
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/30/fail_6.jpg
http://welltuncares.files.wordpress..../08/davvie.gif
http://www.wdmcomputer.com/images/NoButThanks.png
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/troll.jpg
http://www.salagir.com/gfx/troll-web.jpg
http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/i...ne/troll5d.jpg
http://www.etymonline.com/working/fanatic-small.jpg
http://icanhascheezburger.files.word...-flashback.jpg
http://firasd.org/wp/wp-content/uplo...op-posting.jpg
http://www.gearsandwidgets.com/exter...hreadgoing.jpg
http://www.w3bdevil.com/forums/STFU-Stop_Posting.jpg
http://laughingsquid.com/wp-content/...k-awesome1.jpg
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comics/059.png
http://lesitedenini.free.fr/rabbit_pancake.jpg

David A. Smith


  #4  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,037
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote in message

"Dono" wrote in message
...
On May 10, 6:49 pm, karamihas
wrote:

http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif


Did you say "troll"?

http://www.theage.com.au/ffxImage/ur.../1211ww6,0.jpg
http://www.feuerwher.de/forum/feuerwehr_forum_troll.jpg
http://lolpresident.com/wp-content/u...07/05/nose.PNG
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/...le_gasmask.jpg
http://www.myteespot.com/images/Images_d/d_7431.jpg
http://icanhascheezburger.files.word...nd-thought.jpg
http://arcadia.dk/images/01.jpg
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/30/fail_6.jpg
http://welltuncares.files.wordpress..../08/davvie.gif
http://www.wdmcomputer.com/images/NoButThanks.png
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/troll.jpg
http://www.salagir.com/gfx/troll-web.jpg
http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/i...ne/troll5d.jpg
http://www.etymonline.com/working/fanatic-small.jpg
http://icanhascheezburger.files.word...-flashback.jpg
http://firasd.org/wp/wp-content/uplo...op-posting.jpg
http://www.gearsandwidgets.com/exter...hreadgoing.jpg
http://www.w3bdevil.com/forums/STFU-Stop_Posting.jpg
http://laughingsquid.com/wp-content/...k-awesome1.jpg
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comics/059.png
http://lesitedenini.free.fr/rabbit_pancake.jpg

David A. Smith


My favourite:
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comics/059.png
:-)

Dirk Vdm
  #5  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Albertito
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 609
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

On May 11, 2:49 am, karamihas wrote:
[snipped moronic crap]


Hey, ****ing moron, you can't even trolling!
I'll teach you how to troll in this NG. Find
some flaws in a well-established theory.
Once, you have convinced all of us those
flaws are real inconsistencies, then we'll let
you propose a new theory which can repair
those flaws. Then, and only then, we will
discuss about your 'wonderful theory'. And then,
all we'll see the great troll you can be. Until
then, **** off, moron!

  #6  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,599
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

On May 11, 6:41*am, Albertito wrote:
On May 11, 2:49 am, karamihas wrote:
[snipped moronic crap]

Hey, ****ing moron, you can't even trolling!
I'll teach you how to troll in this NG. Find
some flaws in a well-established theory.
Once, you have convinced all of us those
flaws are real inconsistencies, then we'll let
you propose a new theory which can repair
those flaws. Then, and only then, we will
discuss about your 'wonderful theory'. And then,
all we'll see the great troll you can be. Until
then, **** off, moron!


Gere is a grand troll, trolling another troll. Stupid imbecile:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6?dmode=source

You gotta accelerate out of here.

Mike
  #7  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Albertito
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 609
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

On May 11, 11:59 am, Mike wrote:
On May 11, 6:41 am, Albertito wrote:

On May 11, 2:49 am, karamihas wrote:
[snipped moronic crap]


Hey, ****ing moron, you can't even trolling!
I'll teach you how to troll in this NG. Find
some flaws in a well-established theory.
Once, you have convinced all of us those
flaws are real inconsistencies, then we'll let
you propose a new theory which can repair
those flaws. Then, and only then, we will
discuss about your 'wonderful theory'. And then,
all we'll see the great troll you can be. Until
then, **** off, moron!


Gere is a grand troll, trolling another troll. Stupid imbecile:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/2d9e57cf184...

You gotta accelerate out of here.

Mike


Deer Mike:
Are you one of those shrunken heads needing to call how
stupid imbecile are the others in order to forget the
irreparable stupidity that resides in you?

  #8  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,599
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

On May 11, 7:27*am, Albertito wrote:
On May 11, 11:59 am, Mike wrote:





On May 11, 6:41 am, Albertito wrote:


On May 11, 2:49 am, karamihas wrote:
[snipped moronic crap]


Hey, ****ing moron, you can't even trolling!
I'll teach you how to troll in this NG. Find
some flaws in a well-established theory.
Once, you have convinced all of us those
flaws are real inconsistencies, then we'll let
you propose a new theory which can repair
those flaws. Then, and only then, we will
discuss about your 'wonderful theory'. And then,
all we'll see the great troll you can be. Until
then, **** off, moron!


Gere is a grand troll, trolling another troll. Stupid imbecile:


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/2d9e57cf184...


You gotta accelerate out of here.


Mike


Deer Mike:
Are you one of those shrunken heads needing to call how
stupid imbecile are the others in order to forget the
irreparable stupidity that resides in you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I just demonstrated that you are the one how does that.

That was your statements, wasn't it?

You stupid troll. You even forget what you write.

Mike
  #9  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_1226_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default PRIVATE PHYSICS 9

Dear Dirk Van de moortel:

"Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote in message
...
....
My favourite:
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comics/059.png
:-)


Yes. Probably explains why there were so few philosphers in
history... Absolutes being so rare, and all.

David A. Smith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PRIVATE PHYSICS karamihas The Theory of Relativity 2 March 14th 08 09:31 AM
PRIVATE PHYSICS karamihas The Theory of Relativity 1 March 4th 08 05:34 AM
PRIVATE PHYSICS karamihas The Theory of Relativity 2 March 3rd 08 05:59 AM
PRIVATE PHYSICS karamihas The Theory of Relativity 2 February 25th 08 09:51 AM
PRIVATE PHYSICS karamihas The Theory of Relativity 3 February 16th 08 05:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Outsource - Life experiences - Mobile Phone - Mortgage - Mortgages