Feel free to check the equations:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.
If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

On May 10, 1:00*pm, "Androcles" wrote:
*Feel free to check the equations:
* *http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.


Are you still worring what Einstein and Lorentz said? There is nobody
in a sane frame of mind that ever believed what these freaks said.

Are you still wondering with theories that demand the universe is 70%,
80%, or 90%, or 95% (nobody knows) some kind of wired dark matter to
make them work?


Are you a mazochist?

Mike





If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
* *http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

On May 10, 9:04*am, Mike wrote:
On May 10, 1:00*pm, "Androcles" wrote:

*Feel free to check the equations:
* *http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.

Are you still worring what Einstein and Lorentz said? There is nobody
in a sane frame of mind that ever believed what these freaks said.

So Lorentz is a crank in your mind now?

Cranks like you still can't explain how Einstein got his PhD or his
Nobel.


Are you still wondering with theories that demand the universe is 70%,
80%, or 90%, or 95% (nobody knows) some kind of wired dark matter to
make them work?

The numbers have been pretty consistent over the last few years - why
don't you look it up instead of saying "nobody knows" ?


Are you a mazochist?

Mike

If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
* *http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Androcles wrote in message

Feel free to check the equations:

Yes, feel free:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...GOGI-GIGO.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...es/Doofus.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...SetSolve2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ersuasive.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...droDistri.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ythagoras.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...hlessBite.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Competent.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di.../UseTrans.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...es/Sheesh.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di.../SetSolve.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...s/DivZero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...les/Think.html

Dirk Vdm

On May 10, 2:14*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 10, 9:04*am, Mike wrote:

On May 10, 1:00*pm, "Androcles" wrote:

*Feel free to check the equations:
* *http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.

Are you still worring what Einstein and Lorentz said? There is nobody
in a sane frame of mind that ever believed what these freaks said.

So Lorentz is a crank in your mind now?

Hey stupid forever senior, where did you read the word crank in my
post?



Cranks like you still can't explain how Einstein got his PhD or his
Nobel.

Hey stupid dropout, where did you see me trying to give or deny such
explanation?


Are you still wondering with theories that demand the universe is 70%,
80%, or 90%, or 95% (nobody knows) some kind of wired dark matter to
make them work?

The numbers have been pretty consistent over the last few years - why
don't you look it up instead of saying "nobody knows" ?


Hey freaken imbecile, have you learned in the apst year and a half
that a = Gm/r^2 is not an ODE as you indisputably assert in the
following post?

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.ph...b?dmode=source





Are you a mazochist?

Mike

If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
* *http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html


Hey stupid crank, science is more than you over read in your popular
science books. This won't help you graduate and get the bachelors you
have been trying to get for the past ten years or so.

Learnt eh term "compensatory theories" stupid imbecile. All the
predictions SR makes are also the predictions of a general class of
theories which have neither the porinciple of equivalence nor the
principle of the constancy of the speed of light.


Each and every time you reply to a post of mine I will remind people
what you think about a = Gm/r^2 you freak.

Save me time to expose you and do not reply to my posts you imbecile.

Mike



--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On May 10, 5:01*pm, Mike wrote:
On May 10, 2:14*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

On May 10, 9:04*am, Mike wrote:

On May 10, 1:00*pm, "Androcles" wrote:

*Feel free to check the equations:
* *http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.

Are you still worring what Einstein and Lorentz said? There is nobody
in a sane frame of mind that ever believed what these freaks said.

So Lorentz is a crank in your mind now?

Hey stupid forever senior, where did you read the word crank in my
post?



Cranks like you still can't explain how Einstein got his PhD or his
Nobel.

Hey stupid dropout, where did you see me trying to give or deny such
explanation?



Are you still wondering with theories that demand the universe is 70%,
80%, or 90%, or 95% (nobody knows) some kind of wired dark matter to
make them work?

The numbers have been pretty consistent over the last few years - why
don't you look it up instead of saying "nobody knows" ?

Hey freaken imbecile, have you learned in the apst year and a half
that a = Gm/r^2 is not an ODE as you indisputably assert in the
following post?

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.ph...g/01b8793b2b1f...



Are you a mazochist?

Mike

If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
* *http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html

Hey stupid crank, science is more than you over read in your popular
science books. This won't help you graduate and get the bachelors you
have been trying to get for the past ten years or so.

Learnt eh term "compensatory theories" stupid imbecile. All the
predictions SR makes are also the predictions of a general class of
theories which have neither the porinciple of equivalence nor the
principle of the constancy of the speed of light.

Princciple of relativity I meant to say you stupid imbecile, not
equivalence.

Mike


Each and every time you reply to a post of mine I will remind people
what you think about a = Gm/r^2 you freak.

Save me time to expose you and do not reply to my posts you imbecile.

Mike





--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On May 10, 9:00*am, "Androcles" wrote:
*Feel free to check the equations:
* *http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wave.xls

Lorentz shift is greater than Einstein shift which is greater than Doppler
shift.
If you use Einstein shift or Lorentz shift for light you'll get the wrong
answer
and have to create "dark" matter to account for it, which of course produces
a "dark" force and leads to the so-called Pioneer "anomaly".
The only anomaly and dark force is Einstein's black magic.

Doppler's equation may be found at:
* *http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/D...r/doppler.html

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

The Einstein shift goes infinite at the event horizon of a black hole.
Light going in is infinitely blueshifted while light going out is
infinitely redshifted.

The Infinite and Zero energy light predictions disprove black hole
theory.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On May 10, 1:01*pm, Mike wrote:
[snip]

Each and every time you reply to a post of mine I will remind people
what you think about a = Gm/r^2 you freak.

And each and every time I'll roll my eyes at your petty juvenile
behavior.


Save me time to expose you and do not reply to my posts you imbecile.

Mike



--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

wrote:

On May 10, 9:00 am, "Androcles" wrote:
[snip]

The Einstein shift goes infinite at the event horizon of a black hole.
Light going in is infinitely blueshifted while light going out is
infinitely redshifted.

The Infinite and Zero energy light predictions disprove black hole
theory.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

1) Idiot
2) List the four classes of black holes.
3) Idiot,

http://www.meninhats.com/d/20040430.html
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On May 10, 9:00 am, "Androcles" wrote:
[snip]

The Einstein shift goes infinite at the event horizon of a black hole.
Light going in is infinitely blueshifted while light going out is
infinitely redshifted.

The Infinite and Zero energy light predictions disprove black hole
theory.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

1) Idiot
2) List the four classes of black holes.
3) Idiot,


Feel better?