In sci.physics.relativity,

wrote
on Tue, 6 May 2008 22:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
:
On May 6, 8:06*pm, "caveat" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Like charges repulse therefor electricty is a push of one electron
against another by their mutual repulsion. The push flow of current is
a result of electron repulsion one against another.

Mitch Raemsch; Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

How fast is this push flow?

Is it any faster or slower than the actual flow of the electron itself
through the circuit?

Chris; NOT Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

Why don't we accelerate electricity.


We already do.

http://www.cern.ch/LHC/

will start the next generation of such accelerators.
I'm not sure what state it is currently in, but "LHC
Cooldown Status" suggests that construction is complete.


Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008


--
#191,
Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238:
item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; }
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On May 9, 7:19*am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity,

*wrote
on Tue, 6 May 2008 22:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
:





On May 6, 8:06*pm, "caveat" wrote:
wrote in message

....

Like charges repulse therefor electricty is a push of one electron
against another by their mutual repulsion. The push flow of current is
a result of electron repulsion one against another.

Mitch Raemsch; Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

How fast is this push flow?

Is it any faster or slower than the actual flow of the electron itself
through the circuit?

Chris; NOT Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

Why don't we accelerate electricity.

We already do.

http://www.cern.ch/LHC/

will start the next generation of such accelerators.
I'm not sure what state it is currently in, but "LHC
Cooldown Status" suggests that construction is complete.



Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

--
#191,
Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238:
item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; }
** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I mean accelerated electric current.

Mitch Raemsch

In sci.physics.relativity,

wrote
on Fri, 9 May 2008 12:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
:
On May 9, 7:19*am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity,

*wrote
on Tue, 6 May 2008 22:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
:





On May 6, 8:06*pm, "caveat" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Like charges repulse therefor electricty is a push of one electron
against another by their mutual repulsion. The push flow of current is
a result of electron repulsion one against another.

Mitch Raemsch; Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

How fast is this push flow?

Is it any faster or slower than the actual flow of the electron itself
through the circuit?

Chris; NOT Twie Nobel Laureate 2008

Why don't we accelerate electricity.

We already do.

http://www.cern.ch/LHC/

will start the next generation of such accelerators.
I'm not sure what state it is currently in, but "LHC
Cooldown Status" suggests that construction is complete.



Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

--
#191,
Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238:
item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; }
** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I mean accelerated electric current.

Mitch Raemsch

Po-tay-to, po-tah-to. What is a current anyway? It's a
migration of charges. THe LHC is going to be moving
charges at almost lightspeed through a 27 km loop. In fact,
there will be two currents involved (which add, just for
perversity, as they go in opposite directions but also
involve opposite charges).

Of course, we've had this sort of thing since at least
the Bevatron in the 1950's.

So what precisely do you mean?

--
#191,
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set... v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in message
...
| In sci.physics.relativity,
|
| wrote
| on Fri, 9 May 2008 12:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
| :
| On May 9, 7:19 am, The Ghost In The Machine
| wrote:
| In sci.physics.relativity,
|
| wrote
| on Tue, 6 May 2008 22:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
| :
|
|
|
|
|
| On May 6, 8:06 pm, "caveat" wrote:
| wrote in message
|
|
...
|
| Like charges repulse therefor electricty is a push of one electron
| against another by their mutual repulsion. The push flow of
current is
| a result of electron repulsion one against another.
|
| Mitch Raemsch; Twie Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| How fast is this push flow?
|
| Is it any faster or slower than the actual flow of the electron
itself
| through the circuit?
|
| Chris; NOT Twie Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| Why don't we accelerate electricity.
|
| We already do.
|
| http://www.cern.ch/LHC/
|
| will start the next generation of such accelerators.
| I'm not sure what state it is currently in, but "LHC
| Cooldown Status" suggests that construction is complete.
|
|
|
| Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| --
| #191,
| Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238:
| item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; }
| ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -
|
| - Show quoted text -
|
| I mean accelerated electric current.
|
| Mitch Raemsch
|
| Po-tay-to, po-tah-to. What is a current anyway? It's a
| migration of charges. THe LHC is going to be moving
| charges at almost lightspeed through a 27 km loop.

Nope. Double light speed as seen by one relative to the other.

| In fact,

You have no clue what a fact is. You only say "in fact" to convince yourself
of your own crackpot beliefs, the term is entirely redundant, in fact,
actually,
and that's actually a fact, in fact.
--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

On May 10, 8:33*am, "Androcles" wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in ...
| In sci.physics.relativity,
|
| wrote
| on Fri, 9 May 2008 12:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
| :
| On May 9, 7:19 am, The Ghost In The Machine| wrote:

| In sci.physics.relativity,
|
| wrote
| on Tue, 6 May 2008 22:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
| :
|
|
|
|
|
| On May 6, 8:06 pm, "caveat" wrote:
| wrote in message
|
|
...
|
| Like charges repulse therefor electricty is a push of one electron
| against another by their mutual repulsion. The push flow of
current is
| a result of electron repulsion one against another.
|
| Mitch Raemsch; Twie Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| How fast is this push flow?
|
| Is it any faster or slower than the actual flow of the electron
itself
| through the circuit?
|
| Chris; NOT Twie Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| Why don't we accelerate electricity.
|
| We already do.
|
| http://www.cern.ch/LHC/
|
| will start the next generation of such accelerators.
| I'm not sure what state it is currently in, but "LHC
| Cooldown Status" suggests that construction is complete.
|
|
|
| Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
|
| --
| #191,
| Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238:
| item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; }
| ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**-Hide quoted text -
|
| - Show quoted text -
|
| I mean accelerated electric current.
|
| Mitch Raemsch
|
| Po-tay-to, po-tah-to. *What is a current anyway? *It's a
| migration of charges. *THe LHC is going to be moving
| charges at almost lightspeed through a 27 km loop.

Nope. Double light speed as seen by one relative to the other.

| In fact,

You have no clue what a fact is. You only say "in fact" to convince yourself
of your own crackpot beliefs, the term is entirely redundant, in fact,
actually,
and that's actually a fact, in fact.
--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
*http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Accelerated eletricity should be the future of energy. I am looking at
what kind of wire will accomplish this goal.

Mitch Raemsch