Very often physicists with reputation never ask
uncomfortable question, which they dont like.

As is, what property of space, time or matter
makes the universe three dimensionally?

It must be the matter, because time and space
are rather mental construction, I mean, this can
be proved, that these are, and only are, mental
construction. Moreover, matter is considered as
being energy in many groups. Energy again, is
not well posed. What is going on here? Why are
they telling us that we live in three dimensions?

Are we sure we live in a three dimensional manifold,
where 3D relativity holds good in its domain of
applicability? What proofs do we have in hand?

"Smooth John" wrote in message ...
Very often physicists with reputation never ask
uncomfortable question, which they dont like.

That is because *we* have big cars.


As is, what property of space, time or matter
makes the universe three dimensionally?

That would only matter to imbeciles with tiny cars.


It must be the matter, because time and space
are rather mental construction, I mean, this can
be proved, that these are, and only are, mental
construction. Moreover, matter is considered as
being energy in many groups. Energy again, is
not well posed. What is going on here? Why are
they telling us that we live in three dimensions?

The cars, kid, the cars.


Are we sure we live in a three dimensional manifold,
where 3D relativity holds good in its domain of
applicability? What proofs do we have in hand?

None that imbeciles with tiny cars would understand
let alone appreciate.

Dirk Vdm

What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

On May 5, 3:22 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:
What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

This is what they say, but I ask again. What property of matter
makes space three dimensional?

It cant be the atom, because atoms are not three dimensional, they are
not
thick.

Because when you look at electrons, they are not there, they say.
Atoms are not thick.

On May 5, 2:42 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
"Smooth John" wrote in ...
Very often physicists with reputation never ask
uncomfortable question, which they dont like.

That is because *we* have big cars.



Dear Van de moortel, Dirk

I dont understand the reptility of your question. You use words I dont
understand.




As is, what property of space, time or matter
makes the universe three dimensionally?

That would only matter to imbeciles with tiny cars.


Dirk

What do you mean with tiny cars. You use again mythology, I dont
understand what you mean.






It must be the matter, because time and space
are rather mental construction, I mean, this can
be proved, that these are, and only are, mental
construction. Moreover, matter is considered as
being energy in many groups. Energy again, is
not well posed. What is going on here? Why are
they telling us that we live in three dimensions?

The cars, kid, the cars.


Dear Van de moortel, Dirk

I told you that I put you in my Preface, and give you credits for
turning into math symbols everything I gonne say.

Is that not fair to you?




Are we sure we live in a three dimensional manifold,
where 3D relativity holds good in its domain of
applicability? What proofs do we have in hand?

None that imbeciles with tiny cars would understand
let alone appreciate.

Dirk Vdm



Dirk

The space, as I understand, is a manifold folded three times, while
time is exterior at extremities. Time is not included in that
manifold,
because you cannot fold time together with space

On May 5, 1:57*pm, Smooth John wrote:
On May 5, 3:22 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:

What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

This is what they say, but I ask again. What property of matter
makes space three dimensional?

It's not matter that forces the issue.


It cant be the atom, because atoms are not three dimensional, they are
not
thick.

What in heavens name makes you think that?


Because when you look at electrons, they are not there, they say.
Atoms are not thick.

On May 5, 9:06 pm, PD wrote:
On May 5, 1:57 pm, Smooth John wrote:

On May 5, 3:22 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:

What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

This is what they say, but I ask again. What property of matter
makes space three dimensional?

It's not matter that forces the issue.



It cant be the atom, because atoms are not three dimensional, they are
not
thick.

What in heavens name makes you think that?


I just said, reread.

When you look at electrons around nuclei, they are not there.

This means that atoms have not thickness as property. There must
be something else.

However, you may be the first individual on this planet seeing
electrons
around nuclei.

Have a picture? I mean a photo?





Because when you look at electrons, they are not there, they say.
Atoms are not thick.

On May 5, 2:16*pm, Smooth John wrote:
On May 5, 9:06 pm, PD wrote:



On May 5, 1:57 pm, Smooth John wrote:

On May 5, 3:22 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:

What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

This is what they say, but I ask again. What property of matter
makes space three dimensional?

It's not matter that forces the issue.

It cant be the atom, because atoms are not three dimensional, they are
not
thick.

What in heavens name makes you think that?

I just said, reread.

When you look at electrons around nuclei, they are not there.

This means that atoms have not thickness as property.

Don't be silly. It means that puffins do not eat breakfast cereal. It
has nothing to do with whether atoms have thickness as a property.

Look up "monolayer".

There must
be something else.

However, you may be the first individual on this planet seeing
electrons
around nuclei.

Have a picture? I mean a photo?

You mean, with light? Using a wavelength that is larger than the size
of the object it's looking at? Got any idea what kind of luck you'll
have with that?




Because when you look at electrons, they are not there, they say.
Atoms are not thick.

Smooth John schrieb:
Very often physicists with reputation never ask
uncomfortable question, which they dont like.

As is, what property of space, time or matter
makes the universe three dimensionally?

It must be the matter, because time and space
are rather mental construction, I mean, this can
be proved, that these are, and only are, mental
construction. Moreover, matter is considered as
being energy in many groups. Energy again, is
not well posed. What is going on here? Why are
they telling us that we live in three dimensions?

Are we sure we live in a three dimensional manifold,
where 3D relativity holds good in its domain of
applicability? What proofs do we have in hand?

Why are there three dimensions of space?

Maybe you trust me about one dimension of time. That would follow from
causality. Now imagine: what is time to me is space to you. It's the
question of the point of view. I have mine and you have yours, but both
are equivalent.
Now imagine cells in time-like manner arranged, and you have only one
dimension. Then there are neighbors, doing the same. The neighboring
cells are the 'evils' and our own bread are the 'good'. Now you have to
have *any* direction through this arrangement with these features. There
is only one topology that could provide this: the anti commutative ring
of quaternions.
Those quaternions have three spatial neighbors and one temporal. Only
quaternions you can arrange in such a way, that my time is your space.
And those have three spatial and one temporal neighbor


Thomas Heger

On May 5, 9:59 pm, PD wrote:
On May 5, 2:16 pm, Smooth John wrote:



On May 5, 9:06 pm, PD wrote:

On May 5, 1:57 pm, Smooth John wrote:

On May 5, 3:22 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:

What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three
dimensionally?

*******************************

The fact that it has 3 spacial dimensions.

This is what they say, but I ask again. What property of matter
makes space three dimensional?

It's not matter that forces the issue.

It cant be the atom, because atoms are not three dimensional, they are
not
thick.

What in heavens name makes you think that?

I just said, reread.

When you look at electrons around nuclei, they are not there.

This means that atoms have not thickness as property.

Don't be silly. It means that puffins do not eat breakfast cereal. It
has nothing to do with whether atoms have thickness as a property.


Why insults, have you no arguments?

Space and time are not existent, they are mental construction, based
on the 5 senses most of people have.

Close your eyes and put your fingers in your ears. Space will
disappear.
You cant walk, because you have no space to walk in. You only have
some
detectors, which is not space. That can be a plane not space.



Look up "monolayer".


Where?


There must
be something else.

However, you may be the first individual on this planet seeing
electrons
around nuclei.

Have a picture? I mean a photo?

You mean, with light? Using a wavelength that is larger than the size
of the object it's looking at? Got any idea what kind of luck you'll
have with that?


So you have nothing, I am right and you are wrong. Come back when you
see
an atom which is thick.

Atoms dont need space, they are flat.





Because when you look at electrons, they are not there, they say.
Atoms are not thick.