A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
at the front end emits light with speed c (relative to the source),
frequency f and wavelength L. The receiver at the back end measures
the (shifted) frequency:

(1) f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)

where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the receiver (at the moment of reception). Equation (1)
has been verified experimentally (Pound and Rebka) and can be found in
textbooks.

A second textbook equation Einsteinians should never forget:

(2) frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2) gives, for the speed of light
c' measured by the receiver, the equation deduced by Einstein in 1911:

(3) c'= c+v = c(1+gh/c^2); L' = L

Einsteinians hate Einstein's 1911 equation. Deeply. Yet they should
never forget it because some day it will destroy both Einstein's
relativity and "the rest of contemporary physics". True, there is
another corollary of (1) and (2) but this corollary is so absurd that
even the silliest zombies in Einstein criminal cult are reluctant to
refer to it:

(4) c' = c; L' = L/(1+gh/c^2)

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message ...
A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
at the front end emits light with speed c (relative to the source),
frequency f and wavelength L. The receiver at the back end measures
the (shifted) frequency:

(1) f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)

where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the receiver (at the moment of reception). Equation (1)
has been verified experimentally (Pound and Rebka) and can be found in
textbooks.

A second textbook equation Einsteinians should never forget:

(2) frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2) gives, for the speed of light
c' measured by the receiver, the equation deduced by Einstein in 1911:

(3) c'= c+v = c(1+gh/c^2); L' = L

Einsteinians hate Einstein's 1911 equation. Deeply. Yet they should
never forget it because some day it will destroy both Einstein's
relativity and "the rest of contemporary physics". True, there is
another corollary of (1) and (2) but this corollary is so absurd that
even the silliest zombies in Einstein criminal cult are reluctant to
refer to it:

(4) c' = c; L' = L/(1+gh/c^2)

Pentcho Valev


A first geometry textbook equation we should never forget:
the equation of a vertical line parallel to the y-axis through
the point (1,0):
(1) x = 1

A second geometry textbook equation we should never forget:
the equation of a vertical line parallel to the y-axis through
the point (-1,0):
(2) x = -1

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2), giving the equation
deduced by Pentcho Valev in 2008, ultimately proving the
inconsistency of mathematics:
(3) 1 = -1

Dirk Vdm

On May 4, 11:26 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in ...
A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
at the front end emits light with speed c (relative to the source),
frequency f and wavelength L. The receiver at the back end measures
the (shifted) frequency:

(1) f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)

where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the receiver (at the moment of reception). Equation (1)
has been verified experimentally (Pound and Rebka) and can be found in
textbooks.

A second textbook equation Einsteinians should never forget:

(2) frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2) gives, for the speed of light
c' measured by the receiver, the equation deduced by Einstein in 1911:

(3) c'= c+v = c(1+gh/c^2); L' = L

Einsteinians hate Einstein's 1911 equation. Deeply. Yet they should
never forget it because some day it will destroy both Einstein's
relativity and "the rest of contemporary physics". True, there is
another corollary of (1) and (2) but this corollary is so absurd that
even the silliest zombies in Einstein criminal cult are reluctant to
refer to it:

(4) c' = c; L' = L/(1+gh/c^2)

Pentcho Valev


A first geometry textbook equation we should never forget:
the equation of a vertical line parallel to the y-axis through
the point (1,0):
(1) x = 1

A second geometry textbook equation we should never forget:
the equation of a vertical line parallel to the y-axis through
the point (-1,0):
(2) x = -1

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2), giving the equation
deduced by Pentcho Valev in 2008, ultimately proving the
inconsistency of mathematics:
(3) 1 = -1

Dirk Vdm

What on planet Moon are you talking about? Negative geometries in
nature, you are kidding, right? Because if you are not then you
must be very stupid.

Penthco seems consistent, whereas you at best gets credits for turning
into math abbreviations and symbols the things he has to say

Is still unclear why you redirect the followups to

alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bulgarians.female,al t.morons,alt.creep,alt.troll

These must be groups you vist, and is not science

On May 4, 12:47*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
at the front end emits light with speed c (relative to the source),
frequency f and wavelength L. The receiver at the back end measures
the (shifted) frequency:

(1) f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)

where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the receiver (at the moment of reception). Equation (1)
has been verified experimentally (Pound and Rebka) and can be found in
textbooks.

A second textbook equation Einsteinians should never forget:

(2) frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2) gives, for the speed of light
c' measured by the receiver, the equation deduced by Einstein in 1911:

(3) c'= c+v = c(1+gh/c^2); L' = L

Einsteinians hate Einstein's 1911 equation. Deeply. Yet they should
never forget it because some day it will destroy both Einstein's
relativity and "the rest of contemporary physics". True, there is
another corollary of (1) and (2) but this corollary is so absurd that
even the silliest zombies in Einstein criminal cult are reluctant to
refer to it:

(4) c' = c; L' = L/(1+gh/c^2)

In Einstein zombie world, in a gravitational field, the speed of light
is VARIABLE (Divine Albert said so in 1920 and today's Einsteinans
often repeat it) but at the same time it is CONSTANT:

http://www.awitness.org/unified/page..._dilation.html
"The red shifting of a high frequency gamma wave within the earth’s
gravitational field was measured. The effect is exaggerated in the
image above. The image starts out with a certain frequency and wave-
length at the bottom, and then is measured at the top, and found to
have ‘red shifted’, which means that its wave length is longer and its
frequency is less. The speed of light is always the frequency
multiplied by the wavelength so no change in the speed of light
occurs."

Of course, this does not mean that Divine Albert's Divine Theory is
inconsistent; rather, since the speed of light is both VARIABLE and
CONSTANT, Divine Albert's Divine Theory is ABSOLUTELY CONSISTENT.

Pentcho Valev