The thread is based on the “ References � field in the header,
it has nothing to do with titles.
Titles should reflect the content of the post, I maintain.

Reluctantly, indirectly, you're admitting that
you can't see the thread, just like you can't post UTF-8
( 8-bit Unicode ). Shame on you !

I regularly update my newsreader ( including today ).
I assign weights ( i.e. XRanks, like PageRankâ„¢ ) to watch Nyms, etc.

When was the last time “ nn � was updated ? it's decrepit.
Does it understand MIME ? CharSets ( like UTF-8 ) ? threads ?
quoted printable ( in a header ) ?

F.Y.I., the immediate subthread,
most recent first, going up the root, is:

Michael_Moroney
Jeffâ–²Relf
Darwin123
Jeffâ–²Relf
Jeffâ–²Relf
Darwin123

A planet must either Spiral Away From or Into the sun.

I already told you ( and others, via direct replies )
that I was wrong about that, so give it a rest why don't you ?
A simple orbit doesn't spiral away.

In “ et �
Keith_L had the best comment:

The moon might've once had a stable orbit 5,000 miles from the Earth.

Slowly, the earth is spiraling away from the sun.
Earth's spinning tides also affect it's orbit with the sun
( not just the moon ) and the sun is losing mass.

On May 2, 8:37 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
A planet must either Spiral Away From or Into the sun.

I already told you ( and others, via direct replies )
that I was wrong about that, so give it a rest why don't you ?
A simple orbit doesn't spiral away.

In $B!H(Bnews:QP6dnQkQ178opIbVnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@cent urytel.net$B!I(B
Keith_L had the best comment:

The moon might've once had a stable orbit 5,000 miles from the Earth.

Slowly, the earth is spiraling away from the sun.
Earth's spinning tides also affect it's orbit with the sun
( not just the moon ) and the sun is losing mass.



jeff this time I agree with you... because truth is, Planets are
spiraling away from the sun... Worlds are born out of a solar
Eruptions and and become Planets that on their turn become Suns... and
produce planets on their turn...

Bravo Jeff...

Why would anyone want to imagine the earth turning into
it's own solar system ( assuming it were possible ) ?

Ask yourself this: “ What Really matters ? �.
The only lord that matters in the landlord ( e.g. the government );
and, at some level, every landlord is also a tenant.

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
“ =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: �.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with “ � quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.

On May 3, 6:03 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Why would anyone want to imagine the earth turning into
it's own solar system ( assuming it were possible ) ?

Ask yourself this: $B!H(B What Really matters ? $B!I(B.
The only lord that matters in the landlord ( e.g. the government );
and, at some level, every landlord is also a tenant.


because its the truth... Worlds become Suns... so is made our Galaxy.

Jeff?Relf wrote:
[snip crap]

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
³ =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: ².

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ³ ² quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.

No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
' =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: '.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ' ' quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.

This is Usenet convention for decades now. It is useful (no matter what
the newsreader is) because the point being replied to is right there,
amd you don't have to chase the References: thread. Also if you're
replying to one or two points from a 200 line post, you don't have to
(re)read the 200 line post and try to figure out which point is being
commented on.

If you don't like it, feel free to go away, as Usenet isn't for you.

No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.

ITYM 'flout' usenet conventions.

On Sat, 03 May 2008 09:34:24 -0600, Art Deco
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
³ =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: ².

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ³ ² quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.

No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.

I'm pretty sure he'd find annother way to be laughed at and scorned
even if he started following USEnet conventions on quoting.
--
-A (Temporary) Dog, Prophet of the Copybook Headings
use the domain that is erols with tempdog as a name for email
"AUK is no more sinister than its detractors allow it to be." - Jade