On May 6, 2:08 am, John Kennaugh
wrote:
Dono wrote:
On May 5, 2:27 pm, John Kennaugh

idiocies snipped

Old fart, don't you understand that BaTh has ALREADY been falsified by
several experiments? Why do you keep blathering?

Maxwell's theory was falsified in 1887, 1900, 1900 (again), and in 1905.
It is the basis of relativity that it is nevertheless impeccable.

No experiment prior to 1964 is today taken as a serious challenge to
Ballistic theory.

Old fart,

It is easy to prove you wrong:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...g-source_tests




No one has seriously studied it. No one has seriously
attempted to make it work.

Because it cannot be "made to work", old fart. Only lunatics like you
and Ralphie Babbage think that it can work.


rest of your unrelated antirelativistic ramblings snipped

On May 6, 4:37 am, Albert****o wrote the
same old tired ****
http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif

On May 6, 2:22 pm, Dono wrote:
On May 6, 4:37 am, Albert****o wrote the
same old tired ****http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif

Dono****o, the one-experimental man! He has only studied
about the Ives-Stilwell experiment, yet he doesn't understand it.

Dono****o, tell us a little bit about the Ives-Stilwell
experiment. What in the "Ives-Stilwell experimental ****"
didn't you understand?

On May 6, 6:51 am, Albert****o wrote:
On May 6, 2:22 pm, Dono wrote:

On May 6, 4:37 am, Albert****o wrote the
same old tired ****http://www.helinium.nl/trolltech.gif

Albert****o

There are multiple experiments falsifying BaTh. See here, retardo:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...g-source_tests