A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Explaining "dark energy".



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 23rd 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
dwhig265@peoplepc.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Explaining "dark energy".

HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS

Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our “local group”
of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the quiescent center of the
universe, and since all the trillions of other galaxies are expanding
away from us, I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years ago, and orbit
the center just like us, only at speeds exceeding escape velocity.
Simple centrifugal force then, is the “dark energy” powering the
expansion.
These ideas are my original intellectual property and have been
continuously copyrighted by me since 1990, all rights reserved.
Dwain W. Higginbotham Miami, Fla. 23 April 2008


Ads
  #2  
Old April 23rd 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
dlzc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,728
Default Explaining "dark energy".

Dear dwhig...:

On Apr 23, 2:14*pm, wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS

* *Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,


They are not expanding uniformly away from us. We have non-trivial
~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at large. No "center" is
visible in that direction either.

I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years
ago, and orbit the center just like us, only at speeds
exceeding escape velocity. Simple centrifugal force
then, is the “dark energy” powering the expansion.


The ancient church will be so happy that you are now proselytizing for
them.

* * These ideas are my original intellectual
property and have been continuously copyrighted by me
since 1990, all rights reserved.
* * * * * * * * * Dwain W. Higginbotham *Miami, Fla.
*23 April 2008
* * * * * * * * *


Better take this all up with Ptolemy. I think his name is on it, and
it is now in the public domain.

David A. Smith
  #3  
Old April 23rd 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
dwhig265@peoplepc.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Explaining "dark energy".

On Apr 23, 5:34*pm, dlzc wrote:
Dear dwhig...:

On Apr 23, 2:14*pm, wrote:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS


* *Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,


They are not expanding uniformly away from us. *We have non-trivial
~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at large. *No "center" is
visible in that direction either.

DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity. "Quiescent" implies
theres nothing to see.

I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years
ago, and orbit the center just like us, only at speeds
exceeding escape velocity. *Simple centrifugal force
then, is the “dark energy” powering the expansion.


The ancient church will be so happy that you are now proselytizing for
them.

* * These ideas are my original intellectual
property and have been continuously copyrighted by me
since 1990, all rights reserved.
* * * * * * * * * Dwain W. Higginbotham *Miami, Fla.
* * * * * * * * * * * **23 April 2008
* * * * * * * * *


Better take this all up with Ptolemy. *I think his name is on it, and
it is now in the public domain.

David A. Smith


  #4  
Old April 24th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
dlzc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,728
Default Explaining "dark energy".

Dear dwhig...:

On Apr 23, 2:46*pm, wrote:
On Apr 23, wrote: Dear dwhig...:

On Apr 23, 2:14*pm, wrote:


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS


* *Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,


They are not expanding uniformly away from us. *We have
non-trivial ~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at
large. *No "center" is visible in that direction either.


* *DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity.


No, it does not "imply", since the entire Universe is constrained to
orbit "us" FTL. And our local group's components are not static...
Andromeda is coming right at us, and the Magellanic clouds (and more)
are moving away. "Orbitting" makes this motion more problematic.

"Quiescent" implies theres nothing to see.


There should be something to see, a center.

No center. Motion still away from "us", (more or less) uniform wrt
"us", not some mythical center.

David A. Smith
  #5  
Old April 24th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
dwhig265@peoplepc.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Explaining "dark energy".

On Apr 23, 6:28*pm, dlzc wrote:
Dear dwhig...:

On Apr 23, 2:46*pm, wrote:





On Apr 23, wrote: Dear dwhig...:


On Apr 23, 2:14*pm, wrote:


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS


* *Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,


They are not expanding uniformly away from us. *We have
non-trivial ~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at
large. *No "center" is visible in that direction either.


* *DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity.


No, it does not "imply", since the entire Universe is constrained to
orbit "us" FTL. *And our local group's components are not static...
Andromeda is coming right at us, and the Magellanic clouds (and more)
are moving away. *"Orbitting" makes this motion more problematic.

DWH. Thanks for responding. Since we see no red or blue shifts
regarding the rest of the local group, Andromeda has to be orbiting
faster than the rest of us and is already above escape velocity, and
when it's projected to collide with us it will long ago have left the
local group. This idea is also copyrighted but I might give you a
small chunk of the prize
"Quiescent" implies theres nothing to see.


There should be something to see, a center.

DWH. There might be the Mother of all black holes there.

No center. *Motion still away from "us", (more or less) uniform wrt
"us", not some mythical center.

DWH When I say "us" I mean the entire local group, not just the Earth
or Milky Way. The distances involved make it very difficult to
document any proper motion.
David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity 103.0: Observer-Observed "Cancellation" in (Dark) Energy OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 March 16th 07 05:49 AM
Explaining dark-energy inertia in "hurricanozopid" spiral galaxies gb7648@yahoo.com Physics - New Theories 1 June 22nd 06 01:09 AM
Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e."Dark Energy") is BOGUS S D Rodrian Physics - General (alternative forum) 0 January 19th 06 02:26 AM
Harris Theory of Dark Energy; or "Deep Impact at Temple 1 and Dark Matter" Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com Physics - General Discussion 3 July 2nd 05 03:49 AM
Harris Theory of Dark Energy; or "Deep Impact at Temple 1 and Dark Matter" Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com Particle Physics 3 July 2nd 05 03:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phones - Loans - Credit Cards UK - Shares - Smallworld GIS