A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

More evidence proving Apollo Hoax



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,147
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On May 9, 1:11 pm, Denis Feldmann
wrote:
Michael Moroney a écrit :

BradGuth writes:


BTW, didn't you ever hear about our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and
of the dirty tricks from each side?


The Cold War at the time was largely about who was technically superior.
It's why there was a "space race", part of which was Apollo. The USSR
would have just *loved* to prove the moon landings were all a hoax, if
they could. Why didn't they?


The Chinese did say it was a hoax. But they couldn't prove it...


At most any time they could prove it by simply going in for the kill,
if need be orbiting their ongoing mission down to as low as 10 km over
our supposed landing sites.
. - Brad Guth

Ads
  #212  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,147
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On May 9, 12:20 pm, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
BradGuth writes:
BTW, didn't you ever hear about our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and
of the dirty tricks from each side?


The Cold War at the time was largely about who was technically superior.
It's why there was a "space race", part of which was Apollo. The USSR
would have just *loved* to prove the moon landings were all a hoax, if
they could. Why didn't they?


It takes two to tango. Sadly, you're not ever going to understand
that one.
.. - Brad Guth

  #213  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,147
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On May 10, 9:53 am, www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:18:43 -0500, Keith L wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 10, 12:03 am, Keith L wrote:


Saul Levy wrote:


Don't confuse him, Don! lmao!


Saul Levy


On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:45:27 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
wrote:


They faked it from a small asteroid orbiting Alpha Centauri.


C'mon folks, 450,000 people worked on the Apollo project! The British,
Russians, Chinese, and a bunch of other verified the Earth-Moon-Earth
transits and landings. As well as us Ham radio operators with Radio
Astronomy capabilities.


Get real...


KL


Then by all means, do tell where and of how our DARPA/NASA managed to
hide Venus as of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?


How about all of the original film? Is that too going to become MIA?


Do tell us where those 700 larges boxes of our Apollo missions and
supposed moon landing data has gone.


If not a hoax and if you are not at risk, then what do you silly brown-
nosed folks have to hide, besides the matter of our having to employ
those 450,000 folks (not including whatever the USSR had going),
including our cloak and dagger DARPA of those Semitic Third Reich, for
no apparent good reason.


Are you one of those as going to suggest that our mutual cold-war
wasn't Semitic perpetrated on behalf of job-security and profits for
those in charge?
. - Brad Guth


BTW.... The European Space Agency's SMART-1 Lunar Orbiter has
photographed some of the Apollo landing sites.


Read "End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo Moon Sites"
athttp://www.space.com/missionlaunches/050304_moon_snoop.html.


KL


Why don't they want people to know that our solar system is home to more
advanced life than human beings?


Because that would be a very bad kind of anti-faith-based thing to
even suggest as a possibility.

Remember, there's hardly a government on Earth that's not a puppet of
one or more religious cults. It's also the main reason we have
wars.
.. - Brad Guth
  #214  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,147
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On May 10, 8:18 am, Keith L wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 10, 12:03 am, Keith L wrote:


Saul Levy wrote:


Don't confuse him, Don! lmao!


Saul Levy


On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:45:27 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
wrote:


They faked it from a small asteroid orbiting Alpha Centauri.


C'mon folks, 450,000 people worked on the Apollo project! The British,
Russians, Chinese, and a bunch of other verified the Earth-Moon-Earth
transits and landings. As well as us Ham radio operators with Radio
Astronomy capabilities.


Get real...


KL


Then by all means, do tell where and of how our DARPA/NASA managed to
hide Venus as of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?


How about all of the original film? Is that too going to become MIA?


Do tell us where those 700 larges boxes of our Apollo missions and
supposed moon landing data has gone.


If not a hoax and if you are not at risk, then what do you silly brown-
nosed folks have to hide, besides the matter of our having to employ
those 450,000 folks (not including whatever the USSR had going),
including our cloak and dagger DARPA of those Semitic Third Reich, for
no apparent good reason.


Are you one of those as going to suggest that our mutual cold-war
wasn't Semitic perpetrated on behalf of job-security and profits for
those in charge?
. - Brad Guth


BTW.... The European Space Agency's SMART-1 Lunar Orbiter has
photographed some of the Apollo landing sites.

Read "End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo Moon Sites"
athttp://www.space.com/missionlaunches/050304_moon_snoop.html.

KL


That is very true enough, and the best of SMART-1 also hasn't
contributed one iota worth of independent observationology that's in
support of our DARPA/NASA imposed interpretation.

Besides what all sorts of radar soundings (terrestrial as well as via
satellite), gamma-ray spectrometry data is what tells us the
mineralogy composition of the lunar surface, and oddly the JAXA/Selene
mission of their new and greatly improved gamma-ray spectrometry has
gone rather dead, much like their having turned down and/or entirely
excluded the natural color saturation as otherwise HDTV recorded,
perhaps because of it’s UV secondary/recoil of having such an
unavoidable bluish hue, as well as having thus far excluded most all
of their nearly 3D TC obtained images of 10 m resolution, especially
having excluded any of those frames of our supposed Apollo moon
landing sites.

Our moon doesn’t look all that bluish to the terrestrial eye, mostly
because of the 8+r worth of the lunar sodium saturated atmosphere
that’s continually surrounding and trailing away from our moon, as
well as because of our terrestrial sodium and multitude of so many
other polluted aspects of Earth’s atmosphere.

BTW, even the most common alloys or minerals of iron and titanium
within basalt emit their fair share of gamma when hit by cosmic
energy. In fact, most all substances associated with our physically
dark and naked moon (including its sodium) can’t but help emit those
pesky secondary/recoil photons of gamma, plus many other hard and soft
X-rays to boot.

According to the regular laws of physics, when it comes down to
secondary/recoil photons of gamma and X-rays, it seems that our
physically dark and naked moon that's also electrostatic dusty as all
get out, is perhaps capable of being only a thousand fold worse off
dosage than within any Van Allan badlands. Remember that there’s not
all that much of heavy particle density per m3 within them Van Allen
belts for receiving the same cosmic and solar energy to interact and
thus badly react with creating those same secondary/recoil photons,
but on the other hand, it seems our naked moon has lots of good naked
surface density/m3 to offer.
. – Brad Guth
  #215  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
www.freedomtofascism.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 596
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Sat, 10 May 2008 11:03:12 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On May 10, 9:53 am, www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:18:43 -0500, Keith L wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 10, 12:03 am, Keith L wrote:


Saul Levy wrote:


Don't confuse him, Don! lmao!


Saul Levy


On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:45:27 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
wrote:


They faked it from a small asteroid orbiting Alpha Centauri.


C'mon folks, 450,000 people worked on the Apollo project! The British,
Russians, Chinese, and a bunch of other verified the Earth-Moon-Earth
transits and landings. As well as us Ham radio operators with Radio
Astronomy capabilities.


Get real...


KL


Then by all means, do tell where and of how our DARPA/NASA managed to
hide Venus as of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?


How about all of the original film? Is that too going to become MIA?


Do tell us where those 700 larges boxes of our Apollo missions and
supposed moon landing data has gone.


If not a hoax and if you are not at risk, then what do you silly brown-
nosed folks have to hide, besides the matter of our having to employ
those 450,000 folks (not including whatever the USSR had going),
including our cloak and dagger DARPA of those Semitic Third Reich, for
no apparent good reason.


Are you one of those as going to suggest that our mutual cold-war
wasn't Semitic perpetrated on behalf of job-security and profits for
those in charge?
. - Brad Guth


BTW.... The European Space Agency's SMART-1 Lunar Orbiter has
photographed some of the Apollo landing sites.


Read "End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo Moon Sites"
athttp://www.space.com/missionlaunches/050304_moon_snoop.html.


KL


Why don't they want people to know that our solar system is home to more
advanced life than human beings?


Because that would be a very bad kind of anti-faith-based thing to
even suggest as a possibility.

Remember, there's hardly a government on Earth that's not a puppet of
one or more religious cults. It's also the main reason we have
wars.


Even the elite of the planet know that religion is horse **** -- they
invented as a tool to keep people fighting with each other. That is how
they create money.

Isn't it true that the elites have never figured out a way to accept
advanced technology and keep their fiat money system?

Wasn't it JP Morgan who had Tesla killed because he couldn't figure a way to
put a meter on free energy in order to charge people money for it?


  #216  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
www.freedomtofascism.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 596
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Sat, 10 May 2008 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

DARPA/NASA imposed interpretation.


Aren't DARPA and NASA in a conflict of interest given they work to earn
money and gear all of their efforts to the same rather than scientific
achievement?

  #217  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Androcles[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,710
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax


"www.freedomtofascism.com" wrote in message
news | On Sat, 10 May 2008 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
| wrote:
|
| DARPA/NASA imposed interpretation.
|
| Aren't DARPA and NASA in a conflict of interest given they work to earn
| money and gear all of their efforts to the same rather than scientific
| achievement?

1) NASA and DARPA have no interest in scientific achievement per se.
One is concerned with aviation, it is also responsible for long-term
civilian
and military aerospace research and the other with defence, notably
the development of new technology for use by the military.

2) Nobody in either government organisation can truly be said to "work" to
earn money (which comes from taxation). Whoever heard of a civil servant
working (aside from the mailman, perhaps)?


  #218  
Old May 10th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
news.arcor.de
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

Just to change the sub-ject, (not the topic):

I just saw a documentary in germany which could erase all the doubts caused
by the flag, the shadows, the missing stars, etc. ff.
But then I have seen the official movie two weeks ago in LA of the landing
preparation, the orbiting capsule descending to the moon with 2.600 miles/h
orbiting speed, and the accident Armstrong had in May 69 with the training
shuttle on earth, now I m again in doubts.....

Regards

Gerry


  #219  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 448
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

"recoil" is a bad analogy to use for electromagnetic intereaction,
as a consequence of "photon;" the only aspect of light,
that is *corpuscular*, is probably the Compton effect -- but
I'll have to do some more reading on that (since
I only just had a "liberal arts college physics" text with that,
limited to about three sentences). I mean,
there certainly is a reason that Einstein got his Nobel
for this *gedanken* of Planck's idea, and not relativity, S or G. I
mean,
is there really any general recoiling, when an atom abosrbs a quantum
of light, other than the outer electron going
to a higher orbital?

anyway, all of your stuff on "gamma" radiation appears
to not involve any experimental work, either in the lab
or the field; truly, you are a child of DARPA (and NASA,
via Dick Hoagland and the Big Faces;
summa cum laude quad cogito post hoc ergo erat demonstrandum !-)

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm


thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as of missions A-11, A-14
and A-16?


--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 8 (Deuterocanonicos): Prisoners of the
Guantanamo Episcopate!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

It has been frequently observed, that that capacity for evil which is
specific to creatures such as H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell, among
similar such notables, is limited to a kind of voluntary powers given
to human beings, that being a power of which the beasts are innocent.
The perfect illustration of this point, which I develop here, is that
of the current, evil intention of the British Empire, as expressed by
the current imperialist plot associated with the draft Lisbon Treaty.

On the one side, such voluntary powers are expressed, when they are
for the good, by the special quality of modern great discoverers from
among such European scientific figures as Nicholas of Cusa, Leonardo
da Vinci, Johannes Kepler, Pierre de Fermat, Gottfried Leibniz, et al.
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3519wells_cesspool.html
  #220  
Old May 11th 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 448
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

ah, you actually read what I typed; so, now,
address the question of the representation of a planet,
within your JPL-share-ware planetarium/headbasket, please:
where is the phase of Venus, as seen by Galileo etc. ??

such within a given FOV that included either the horizon of our moon
or that of Earth.

Clue; *planets are not stars, and not that the extremely bluish and
vibrant Sirius shouldn't have been easily recorded within the dynamic
range of that unfiltered Kodak film.


thus:
"recoil" is a bad analogy to use for electromagnetic intereaction,
as a consequence of "photon;" the only aspect of light,
that is *corpuscular*, is probably the Compton effect -- but
I'll have to do some more reading on that (since
I only just had a "liberal arts college physics" text with that,
limited to about three sentences). I mean,
there certainly is a reason to why, Einstein got his Nobel
for this *gedanken* of Planck's idea, and not for relativity, S or G.
I mean,
is there really any general recoiling, when an atom abosrbs a quantum
of light, other than the outer electron going
to a higher orbital?

anyway, all of your stuff on "gamma" radiation appears
to not involve any experimental work, either in the lab
or the field; truly, you are a child of DARPA (and NASA,
via Dick Hoagland and the Big Faces;
summa cum laude quad cogito post hoc ergo erat demonstrandum !-)
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as of missions A-11, A-14
and A-16?


--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 8 (Deuterocanonicos): Prisoners of the
Guantanamo Episcopate!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

It has been frequently observed, that that capacity for evil which is
specific to creatures such as H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell, among
similar such notables, is limited to a kind of voluntary powers given
to human beings, that being a power of which the beasts are innocent.
The perfect illustration of this point, which I develop here, is that
of the current, evil intention of the British Empire, as expressed by
the current imperialist plot associated with the draft Lisbon Treaty.

On the one side, such voluntary powers are expressed, when they are
for the good, by the special quality of modern great discoverers from
among such European scientific figures as Nicholas of Cusa, Leonardo
da Vinci, Johannes Kepler, Pierre de Fermat, Gottfried Leibniz, et al.
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3519wells_cesspool.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax schoenfeld.one@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 375 August 12th 08 01:49 PM
Apollo XIIIX hoax Ken S. Tucker Physics - General Discussion 26 December 29th 05 11:15 AM
Apollo 13 Hoax??? JKF Physics - General Discussion 6 March 31st 05 09:43 PM
Any scientific evidence proving me wrong? Creative Music Synth [220] Physics - General Discussion 0 February 16th 04 07:16 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ Nathan Jones Physics - General Discussion 12 November 6th 03 06:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgage - eBay - Debt Help - Loans - Mortgages