On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth

That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH

That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?

Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
.. - Brad Guth

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth

That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH

That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?


It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what is
the relevance?


Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth


No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.

Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?

On Apr 25, 3:53 pm, Rock Brentwood wrote:
On Apr 24, 6:29 am, Eric Gisse wrote:

Am I the only one who is impressed by the sheer complexity of the
arguments supporting the conspiracy theory?...

[...]

The analogy would be for a conspiracy nut-case to proclaim (on a
soapbox at noontime on a cloudless day) that there is no sun and that
assertions to the contrary are simply a ploy by a colluding clique of
astronomers to boondoggle the public into supporting solar energy
(which, according to the conspiracy theorist, would then actually be a
secret programme to install 2-ways microwave sensors and transmitters
throughout the land to control the public's brainwaves, since there
would be no sun for the solar energy to be solar of)..

Bringing in up conspiracy theory nonsense as the last resort to your
argument is like calling people who do not believe in your God as
conspiracy nut-cases. It is a total faith issue which should not be
part of a scientific discussion, but it is. That really tell you
something about these desperate zealous.

On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:04 am, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Apr 21, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The task could be achieved through unmanned missions not necessarily
short men painted green. shrug

What "unmanned missions" ?

Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug


Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?



What is the nonsense about the Soviet spy antenna records? Is that
where you got these little green men from?

How do you suppose these Apollo astronauts with 0.25g/cm^2 of shield
is going to come up totally unharmed after being bombarded with 3E-14
solar mass per year of energy? Little green men reported from
unclassified Soviet antenna spy whatever archive?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind

The higher energy particles would damage your DNA with higher
probability of causing some sorts of cancer in a few years. The lower-
energy ones would manifest shorter term illness. It is not advisable
to be bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy at earth’s
orbit with just 0.25g/cm^2 of shielding from the command module.
shrug

Oh this again? You were proven wrong with the actual ACE/SOHO
spacecraft data and here you are repeating the same **** again.

Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don’t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.

Nope - you farted and ran away from the discussion because you
couldn't even read the data sheets.


In the meantime, the Chinese are ‘going back to the moon’. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?

On Apr 25, 6:25 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth

That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH

That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?

It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what is
the relevance?

JAXA/Selene has by now at least dozens if not hundreds of their crisp
and clear TC frames per given landing site. Oddly they are not
sharing. In fact, even their wide/telephoto HDTV images are extremely
limited and having been frame by frame modified in order to exclude
most of the lunar mineral hue/color saturations, as well as utilizing
a minimal amount of the available dynamic range.


Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth

No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.

Still the same old silly brown-nosed boy, are you not.


Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?

They're all available from JAXA. Why don't you ask for yourself, or
wait until unavoidably they can't help but deliver those 1m/pixel
images. Of course China can always dive in for the same or better
resolution.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

On Apr 22, 12:04 am, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Apr 21, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The task could be achieved through unmanned missions not necessarily
short men painted green. shrug

What "unmanned missions" ?

Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug

Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?





What is the nonsense about the Soviet spy antenna records? Is that
where you got these little green men from?

How do you suppose these Apollo astronauts with 0.25g/cm^2 of shield
is going to come up totally unharmed after being bombarded with 3E-14
solar mass per year of energy? Little green men reported from
unclassified Soviet antenna spy whatever archive?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind

The higher energy particles would damage your DNA with higher
probability of causing some sorts of cancer in a few years. The lower-
energy ones would manifest shorter term illness. It is not advisable
to be bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy at earth’s
orbit with just 0.25g/cm^2 of shielding from the command module.
shrug

Oh this again? You were proven wrong with the actual ACE/SOHO
spacecraft data and here you are repeating the same **** again.

Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don’t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.

Nope - you farted and ran away from the discussion because you
couldn't even read the data sheets.



In the meantime, the Chinese are ‘going back to the moon’. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?

The only farts here are those pesky semitic and DARPA ones. (smells
exactly like a Hitler fart).
. - Brad Guth

On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug

Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?

Again, missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van
Allen Belts. shrug

Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don’t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.

Nope - you farted and ran away from the discussion because you
couldn't even read the data sheets.

Not quiet, you failed to understand the material I have presented, and
worst of all you also failed to understand the materials you pulled
out. That is why knowing a few buzz words cannot get you that college
degree. That is why you are an n’th-year (which I have lost count)
super senior at the very prestigious university of Alaska. shrug

In the meantime, the Chinese are ‘going back to the moon’. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?

On Apr 25, 11:42 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug

Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?

Again, missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van
Allen Belts. shrug

Oh, the same garbage from fat Gisse again. You were pointed out of
your bullsh*t errors many times over. Get lost. Don’t come back
before you actually understand the stuff you came up with.

Nope - you farted and ran away from the discussion because you
couldn't even read the data sheets.

Not quiet, you failed to understand the material I have presented, and
worst of all you also failed to understand the materials you pulled
out. That is why knowing a few buzz words cannot get you that college
degree. That is why you are an n’th-year (which I have lost count)
super senior at the very prestigious university of Alaska. shrug

In the meantime, the Chinese are ‘going back to the moon’. I wonder
if they will play the game along and be content with being second.
This would be very easy to do. All you need is a decent special
effect director. Or would they expose and embarrass NASA?

Apollo LEO was certainly doable, although the Saturn 5 package should
have been capable of accomplishing a brief visit into the moon's L1 as
having been technically doable, as well as for sending those robotic/
unmanned portions on towards orbiting and one-way impacting with the
moon, with some of their most robust instruments surviving their hard/
impact deployments.

If need be, those custom S-Band transponders could have made it seem
by all of terrestrial accounts as though they'd been orbiting Mars.

In other kind words, and of unmanned efforts, there is Apollo stuff on
the moon.
. - Brad Guth

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 25, 6:25 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Apr 25, 5:46 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Why the lack of Usenet/Group interest in anything JAXA SELENE?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/3a4022...
Brad Guth

That link goes to one of your rants on a different forum.

I don't think Usenet lacks interest in Jaxa; I think Usenet lacks
interest
in Brad Guth.

HTH

That's to be expected.

Since JAXA/Selene is all about our moon, and soon enough orbiting at
merely 10 km with those TC optics recording that physically dark
surface at one meter/pixel, and therefore why is it not worthy of your
expertise?

It is. Post some images of the landing sites. If there aren't any, what
is
the relevance?

JAXA/Selene has by now at least dozens if not hundreds of their crisp
and clear TC frames per given landing site.


Why do you believe this is true?


Oddly they are not
sharing. In fact, even their wide/telephoto HDTV images are extremely
limited and having been frame by frame modified in order to exclude
most of the lunar mineral hue/color saturations, as well as utilizing
a minimal amount of the available dynamic range.


You say that the Japanese are falsifying wide view television images of the
moon. Why would they do that? What do you think they are hiding in these
images? Aliens from Area 41?



Even at 10 m/pixel is more than good enough as is.
. - Brad Guth

No, I supplied the calculations showing it was nowhere near good enough.

Still the same old silly brown-nosed boy, are you not.

No, I am a mathematician with an interest in optics.





Of course, if you would like to post the highest resolution photos of the
landing sites that you have access to, I could go through the physics
with
an actual example.

So why don't you do that?

They're all available from JAXA. Why don't you ask for yourself,

Because I am not trying to prove that Apollo was a hoax. If you want to use
photos as proof that it was a hoax, you really need to be able to produce
the photos. No photos, no evidence.



or
wait until unavoidably they can't help but deliver those 1m/pixel
images.

The images are 10m/pixel, and so would not possibly show the LEM.


Of course China can always dive in for the same or better
resolution.

Yes. If Apollo was a hoax, and there are so many ways it could be disproved,
funny that not one government has ever bother attempted to find out.


. - Brad Guth

Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 25, 11:40 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van Allen
Belts. shrug

Again - what "unmanned missions" are you talking about?

Again, missions without sending men physically into or beyond the Van
Allen Belts. shrug

I think you misunderstand Eric's question. Your imaginary
missions could get imaginary ranging equipment to the Moon,
but the stuff is there in *reality*.

--
--Bryan