On Apr 22, 11:05 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Apr 22, 6:14 pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the
JAXA/
Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look
at
those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites..
. -BradGuth

China is planning on doing the same reduced orbital range, and thus
offering more than sufficient raw resolution.
. -BradGuth

So, no matters how reliable the raw pixels are, and of no matters how
many images are stacked or having been properly resampled, you don't
believe in anything that's enlarged unless it's of inert eye-candy.
Are you also Muslim?

None of your ****ing business.

Why are you speaking for Eric Gisse?

Of course 100% of all cosmic eye-candy pictures that are published for
public review are of those stacked, resampled and colorized to death,
whereas oddly that's perfectly OK by your hocus-pocus standards. How
interesting.
. -BradGuth

***********************************
I went through all this stuff withGuthabout 6 months ago - I calculated
the size of a telescope that would be needed to even to show a single
pixel
variation from background albedo - its about ten times larger than the
current resolving ability of terrestrial/LEO telescopes. When shown to be
wrong, he called me a Jew and started spouting abuse.

Not that this is in any way directly relevant to whether the Apollo
missions
were a fake - nobody would bother using the world's largest telescopes to
look for a single pixel variation in lunar albedo to try and prove that
the
Apollo landings happened. It would be like chartering a long range
aircraft
to fly around the world to prove the earth isn't flat.

He is simply a crank. No point in discussing the issue with him; when
proved
wrong he will simply change the subject, rather than changing his
position.

Are we being silly?

Not "we". Just you.

Why would a bright and shiny Apollo item as set upon a physically dark
moon not yield a noticeably brighter than average pixel?

We went through this before.

No, as once again you have bullied your out-of-context way through
through this without one bit of objective evidence.

Something as bright and shiny upon the nearly coal dark and nasty
surface is going to make a given 10 meter resolution pixel light up
rather nicely, and of the quality JAXA 10 meter resolution TC is in
fact going to record just that.

So, with countless tens of thousands of archived images thus far, it
seems JAXA/Selene has come up empty handed, and for that matter never
once having depicted the .65~.75 albedo worthy terrain of where
several of our supposed missions landed.


The best resolution of terrestrial telescopes results in a pixel area of
about 100 sq metres. The bit of the LEM left on the moon is perhaps 10 sq
metres. Its likely to have a dust coating, and it throws a shadow (also part
of the pixel). So you might (back of an envelope) assume that this 10 sq
metres is twice as bright as the other 90 sqm in the pixel. This would give
you - at a generous estimate - about a 10% brighter pixel than you would
expect. However, its very obvious that the variations between pixels varies
by far, far more than 10%, as the natural topography of the lunar surface
means that some areas are more brightly lit than others (as some are
directly facing the sun, but others are at an angle and hence receive less
incident light). You can confirm this with a cheap pair of binoculars.

So the variation from having the remainder of the LEM still on the moon is
orders of magnitude less than the natural variation in the apparent
brightness of different patches of the ground, and hence would be impossible
to extract from this "noise" deriving from other topographic differences.

Got it this time?

We got the part of your being a born-again liar.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 22, 9:16 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 22, 8:13 pm, BradGuth wrote:







On Apr 21, 7:42 pm, wrote:

On Apr 22, 9:10 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Is this another bogus topic?

Besides all the JAXA images (plus the other 99.99% of them we're not
even being shown) that so far do not support our NASA/Apollo ruse,
seems as though you haven't taken hardly anything other into account,
that which clearly proves we have not walked on our moon.

This post is "more" evidence, not the entire case. Over the years I've
posted various factoids proving the case for the Apollo Hoax. Included
were photographic evidence, circumstantial facts, physics analysis and
the basic math of parallel shadows and distant light-sources.

No matter how factual the case may be, most people (especially those
who claim to be educated in physics/math) simply won't consider it.
These people are simply weak-minded and only want to believe what
makes them happy. Like a child foolishly insisting that the tooth
fairy really exists when confronted with a pantheon of objective
reality.

They are brown-nosed minions of their Third Reich kind, and for the
most part Semitic to boot. Continued lies and exclusion of evidence
is what makes them happy campers. It's all very MI5/CIA cloak and
dagger.

The intent of my posts here are to help future analysis understand
true ignorance. Of course, they (and myself) know that is not my posts
which serve to demonstrate this phenomenon, it's most of the resulting
responses.

Their responses are either officially limited or scripted.
. -BradGuth

Paranoid delusions are so fun to watch from a distance.

Spoken like a Third Reich trooper of your Semitic/Zionist mindset.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 22, 9:56 pm, wrote:
BradGuth's bogeymen are no whimps..
they're like Hitler, Einstein and James Bond rolled into one.

At least my bogeymen are certified as NASA/Apollo and DARPA.

DARPA (our very own Third Reich collective of Semitic wizards)
"This agency brought forth the Saturn 5 rocket, surveillance
satellites, the Internet, stealth technology, guided munitions,
unmanned aerial vehicles, night vision and the body armor that's in
use today,"

“So what's hot at DARPA right now? Bugs. The creepy, crawly flying
kind. The Agency's Microsystems Technology Office is hard at work on
HI-MEMS (Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical System), raising real
insects filled with electronic circuitry, which could be guided using
GPS technology to specific targets via electrical impulses sent to
their muscles. These half-bug, half-chip creations - DARPA calls them
"insect cyborgs" - would be ideal for surveillance missions, the
agency says in a brief description on its website.�

Are these fellow spooks, moles and Yids of our MI5/CIA~NASA and of
their DARPA protected Third Reich plus Skull and Bones, having a good
enough cloak and dagger time yet?
. - Brad Guth

On Apr 22, 4:52 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:28 am, BradGuth wrote:







On Apr 22, 12:04 am, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Apr 21, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:06 pm, JanPB wrote:

1. Who put the mirror lunar ranging equipment on the Moon? Little
green men?

The task could be achieved through unmanned missions not necessarily
short men painted green. shrug

What "unmanned missions" ?

2. Who was transmitting TV broadcast signals from the Moon at the time
of Apollo missions (as shown by recently declassified Soviet spy
antennas records)? Little green men?

What is the nonsense about the Soviet soy antenna records? Is that
where you got these little green men from?

How do you suppose these Apollo astronauts with 0.25g/cm^2 of shield
is going to come up totally unharmed after being bombarded with 3E-14
solar mass per year of energy? Little green men reported from
unclassified Soviet antenna spy whatever archive?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind

The higher energy particles would damage your DNA with higher
probability of causing some sorts of cancer in a few years. The lower-
energy ones would manifest shorter term illness. It is not advisable
to be bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy at earth’s
orbit with just 0.25g/cm^2 of shielding from the command module.
shrug

Oh this again? You were proven wrong with the actual ACE/SOHO
spacecraft data and here you are repeating the same **** again.

Stop watching more useless films. Do the math yourself, film critic..

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...msg/d787a05160

1...

BTW, our naked moon is unavoidably reactive because it's made of such
a hard density worth of matter, instead of a vapor/gas that's far less
reactive, thus our physically dark and nasty moon is contributing it's
secondary/recoil anticathode worth of gamma and hard-X-rays, like none
other.

Each and every one of those Apollo miisions to/from the moon were
essentially a two-part series of their unmanned orbital missions that
went onward from the moon's L1, into lunar orbiting and as best could
deploying technology up until each of their hard/impact landings. At
least that's pretty much the best we can manage to pull off as of
today.
. -BradGuth

Whatever you say guthball.

Why don't we ask those kind folks at DARPA ?
. - Brad Guth

BradGuth writes:

On Apr 22, 9:16 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

Paranoid delusions are so fun to watch from a distance.

Spoken like a Third Reich trooper of your Semitic/Zionist mindset.
. - Brad Guth

You're right, Eric. Paranoid delusions are interesting from a (safe)
distance.

On Apr 22, 6:02*am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
. - Brad Guth

For them it's WW4. It looks like they're going to attempt it. It seems
that this time they will fail - and fail big.

On Apr 21, 1:22*am, BradGuth wrote:

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)

for more about the jews' moon hoax:

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

On Apr 23, 7:21 am, wrote:
On Apr 22, 6:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
. - Brad Guth

For them it's WW4. It looks like they're going to attempt it. It seems
that this time they will fail - and fail big.

Notice how these rich and powerful (mostly Jewish) folks never have a
bad word to say about their new and improved cost of energy, that
which has only inflated by 3200% in 60 years.

At this point, even another WW by conventional standards is going to
be fossil and synfuel energy spendy as hell, of which leaves us with
having to use their thermal nuclear and VX options as a preemptive
strike against all those considered as less than sufficiently Semitic/
Zionist (aka Third Reich) worthy.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 23, 9:02 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 23, 7:21 am, wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
. - Brad Guth

For them it's WW4. It looks like they're going to attempt it. It seems
that this time they will fail - and fail big.

Notice how these rich and powerful (mostly Jewish) folks never have a
bad word to say about their new and improved cost of energy, that
which has only inflated by 3200% in 60 years.

At this point, even another WW by conventional standards is going to
be fossil and synfuel energy spendy as hell, of which leaves us with
having to use their thermal nuclear and VX options as a preemptive
strike against all those considered as less than sufficiently Semitic/
Zionist (aka Third Reich) worthy.
. - Brad Guth

BTW, notice how it's only the pretend-atheist Jews of DARPA that are
continually upset with deductive notions other than scripted by their
NASA/Apollo cult.
.. - Brad Guth

Returning to the real world for a minute, if I may..

Where does the Third Reich hold its meetings these days ? synagogues ?
what's on the agenda ?
which of them, exactly, are members of NASA or DARPA ?

Taxes and regulations are good for society because
it moderates society's appetite, improving its health.

Taxes and regulations are the “ rent � one has to pay
if one wishes to live in a civilized society.

Wars are about control of prime real estate, not religion.
The only Lord that matters is the land Lord ( e.g. the government ).
Going up a level, every land Lord finds he's a tenant as well.

WWII was about the Suez Canal, a 4 thousand year old battle,
and the crude oil in the Middle East.