On Apr 21, 12:02*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:22*pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote:

On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)

Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more
than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites.
With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed)
could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel.

Do you actually believe you can get a factor of ten increase in
resolution from photoshop?

I can get anything from photoshop.

On Apr 21, 4:02*am, wrote:

They lost all moon _rocks_ too.

Liar.

Odd that when I keep trying to give this topic those nifty gold stars
(Google/Usenet), that somehow others are continually taking them away
just as fast as I put them on. What the hell gives?
.. - Brad Guth

wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

On Apr 20, 9:04*pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Same old idiocy.

1. Who put the mirror lunar ranging equipment on the Moon? Little
green men?
2. Who was transmitting TV broadcast signals from the Moon at the time
of Apollo missions (as shown by recently declassified Soviet spy
antennas records)? Little green men?

--
Jan Bielawski

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

"JanPB" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.


Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

| Same old idiocy.

Can't you get him a job changing light bulbs, like you?

On Apr 21, 6:06 pm, JanPB wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Same old idiocy.

1. Who put the mirror lunar ranging equipment on the Moon? Little
green men?
2. Who was transmitting TV broadcast signals from the Moon at the time
of Apollo missions (as shown by recently declassified Soviet spy
antennas records)? Little green men?

--
Jan Bielawski

Same old duh.

What has a easily robotic deployed retroreflector (or several
retroreflective items) have to do with moon walking?
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 21, 12:02 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:22 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote:

On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)

Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more
than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites.
With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed)
could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel.

Do you actually believe you can get a factor of ten increase in
resolution from photoshop?

I can accomplish 8X with reasonable results, a 5th grader should be
able to accomplish 4X right off the bat.

BTW, I'd said along with image stacking, although other than PhotoShop
(perhaps PhotoZoom) can accomplish a little better job of enlarging to
10X without distorting one damn thing. A digital stack of 10 frames
couldn't hurt. . - Brad Guth


It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the JAXA/
Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look at
those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites..
. - Brad Guth

China is planning on doing the same reduced orbital range, and thus
offering more than sufficient raw resolution.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 21, 1:32 pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 21, 12:02 am, Eric Gisse wrote:



On Apr 20, 9:22 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote:

On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)

Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more
than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites.
With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed)
could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel.

Do you actually believe you can get a factor of ten increase in
resolution from photoshop?

I can get anything from photoshop.

Try PhotoZoom.
.. - BG

On Apr 22, 9:10 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Is this another bogus topic?

Besides all the JAXA images (plus the other 99.99% of them we're not
even being shown) that so far do not support our NASA/Apollo ruse,
seems as though you haven't taken hardly anything other into account,
that which clearly proves we have not walked on our moon.

This post is "more" evidence, not the entire case. Over the years I've
posted various factoids proving the case for the Apollo Hoax. Included
were photographic evidence, circumstantial facts, physics analysis and
the basic math of parallel shadows and distant light-sources.

No matter how factual the case may be, most people (especially those
who claim to be educated in physics/math) simply won't consider it.
These people are simply weak-minded and only want to believe what
makes them happy. Like a child foolishly insisting that the tooth
fairy really exists when confronted with a pantheon of objective
reality.

The intent of my posts here are to help future analysis understand
true ignorance. Of course, they (and myself) know that is not my posts
which serve to demonstrate this phenomenon, it's most of the resulting
responses.



BTW, why exactly are those Google/Usenet gold stars locked up?
. - Brad Guth

On Apr 22, 9:10 am, BradGuth wrote:
[...]
BTW, why exactly are those Google/Usenet gold stars locked up?

I noticed that too. Google have been harassing me for a while now.

. - Brad Guth