A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

More evidence proving Apollo Hoax



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
Paul Mays
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 272
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax





"Marcus" wrote in message
...
BradGuth wrote:


JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)


I knew it! It's a Jewish conspiracy!!



Them fellers got their hands in all kinda mischief....


--
http://fast.filespace.org/PaulRMays/Postulate.pdf

--
Paul R. Mays
"I Believe in Nothing, I Know, I think I Know or I Do Not Know
I Never Believe... For to Believe is a Religious Incantation"



Ads
  #32  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
CWatters[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax


wrote in message
...
On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote:
We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when
I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text -


The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal.


No it doesn't.

1) There were several ground stations recieving signals at the same time.
2) The ground stations would have noticed if the signal wasn't coming from
the general direction of the moon.
3) They astronaughts couldn't have stayed on a line between the recieving
station and the moon as there were multiple ground stations.

At the very least one geostationary sat would have been required per ground
station.




  #33  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 3:22 am, wrote:
On Apr 21, 3:39 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:



On Apr 20, 9:27 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Apr 20, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:


On Apr 20, 9:03 pm, BradGuth wrote:
[snip]


You are insane.


Unlike yourself, at least our evidence is easily peer replicated
outside of your NASA/Apollo cult. Too bad you folks still don't have
anything to work with, other than whatever's scripted within your NASA/
Apollo Qur'an.
. -BradGuth


I wonder what other insane conspiracy theories you believe in. Do you
have ... unorthodox ... opinions about the war of 1812 as well?


Here's a quick overview:

By 1810,The House of Rothschild not only had a substantial stake in
the Bank of the United States, they were quietly gaining control of
the Bank of England. Although foreign owners were not, by law, allowed
a say in the day to day operations of the Bank of the United States,
there is little doubt that the American share holders and directors
were, if not affiliated, complicit in the aims and goals of the
Illuminati and their central bankers.

In 1811 the charter for the First Bank of America was not renewed. As
a result, the House of Rothschild lost millions. This enraged Nathan
Rothschild so much that he, almost single handedly fomented the War of
1812. Using his formidable power and influence, he coerced the British
Parliament to attempt to retake the Colonies. The first military
attempt failed. The second strategy was to divide and conquer. Any
serious historian will find that the Civil War was largely stirred up
by Rothschild's illuminati agents in the United States.

http://www.redicecreations.com/speci...redshield.html


That's offering way too much truth and consequences for all of these
Semitic brown-nosed minions of their Third Reich.

Notice all the mainstream flak that your informative topic has drawn.
It's as though one of our lose cannon shots made a direct hit upon
some of their mostly Semitic private parts.
.. - Brad Guth
  #34  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 3:12 am, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:



wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.


http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg


Find more at:


http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/


We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when
I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text -


The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal.
In fact there was a massive blunder in one of the shoots where a fake
far-away earth could be seen in one window then the real close-earth
was briefly seen on another.

Bart Sibrel found that one. Google it and you'll probably find it.


I think as a brave crew they may have actually made it to/from the
moon's L1, because that's technically doable via the Saturn V as
having nearly a 30% inert GLOW to deal with, but then I could be
wrong. I also believe mission A-13 was a manned effort at
accomplishing a brief half+ orbit of our moon, at a somewhat safer
orbital distance and just for that one brief radiation exposure from
their having been so close to our reactive/anticathode moon.

The vast majority of our NASA/Apollo science about our moon was
otherwise obtained robotically from orbit, with only limited surface
probes that survived their hard/impact landings.
.. - Brad Guth
  #35  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 11:38 am, "CWatters"
wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:

wrote:
We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when
I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text -

The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal.


No it doesn't.

1) There were several ground stations recieving signals at the same time.
2) The ground stations would have noticed if the signal wasn't coming from
the general direction of the moon.
3) They astronaughts couldn't have stayed on a line between the recieving
station and the moon as there were multiple ground stations.

At the very least one geostationary sat would have been required per ground
station.


Where is the moon's L1 ? (duh! general direction of the moon?)
.. - Brad Guth
  #36  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 8:54 am, (Marcus) wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly
Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated)


I knew it! It's a Jewish conspiracy!!


So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
.. - Brad Guth
  #37  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 9:11 am, "Paul Mays" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 21, 10:13 pm, "Paul Mays" wrote:



wrote in message


...
On Apr 21, 2:20 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
wrote:


Dear john:


"john" wrote in message


....
...


When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would
actually be some evidence.


I want to see the flag


With 40 years of bombardment by cosmic radiation and UV, it will
be two "sticks" and tatters.


No flags, no tracks, no LEM, only fake photos and videos.


The original video cannot be digitially enhanced as all the 700 boxes
of it were "lost".


700 boxes still not found. What monstrous stupidity to keep believing
these lies of NASA.

No they didn't


They lost all moon _rocks_ too.


No they didn't


Yes they did. This happened around the 80s. It was an excuse to not
hand out real rocks for independent analysis. Only tiny dirt samples
were consequently given for independent review. Von Braun at NASA went
on an expedition to recover small samples of legitamite moon rock from
a meteorite at Antarctica.

But no moon _rock_ has ever been independently reviewed.

They can't get more because they "lost" the plans for that Saturn
rockets.


No they didn't.. I have a pretty good set that they sent me during
the NASA Student Study program in 1965. and at least 2 sets
are at NASA in Titusville. Seen em myself in 95.


Touched a moon rock.


No you didn't. You touched a desert rock and were made to believe it
was something more because you are easily misled. A spectral analysis
would've revealed otherwise.

damn, forgot mine at home. Oh I C... Ive been misled by bunches of folks
that I have known, some I've read of, some be reputation and I of course was
misled by them and you have the path to enlightenment.. Otay.. I'll pass

Designed and installed the Back up power system for the new data center
in 95 and if they have a problem finding the plans they could always take
a look at the 2 saturn 5's they have on display and in storage to get the
details.


Manufacturing requires more than a play-do prototype.

NASA admits they lost the "blueprints" for most of the Saturn engine,
hull and various other important components.

hint: that's why they "cant go back" and why their current programme
to "go back" is stuck trying to solve problems they supposedly already
solved.

--http://fast.filespace.org/PaulRMays/Postulate.pdf

--
Paul R. Mays
"I Believe in Nothing, I Know, I think I Know or I Do Not Know
I Never Believe... For to Believe is a Religious Incantation"


You're really ****ing off those Semitic troops of our cloaked Third
Reich.

DARPA (our very own Third Reich collective of Semitic wizards)
"This agency brought forth the Saturn 5 rocket, surveillance
satellites, the Internet, stealth technology, guided munitions,
unmanned aerial vehicles, night vision and the body armor that's in
use today,"

“So what's hot at DARPA right now? Bugs. The creepy, crawly flying
kind. The Agency's Microsystems Technology Office is hard at work on
HI-MEMS (Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical System), raising real
insects filled with electronic circuitry, which could be guided using
GPS technology to specific targets via electrical impulses sent to
their muscles. These half-bug, half-chip creations - DARPA calls them
"insect cyborgs" - would be ideal for surveillance missions, the
agency says in a brief description on its website.”

Are these fellow spooks, moles and Yids of our MI5/CIA~NASA and of
their DARPA protected Third Reich, having a good enough cloak and
dagger time yet?

Are those Third Reich Semites and of their brown-nosed minions
actually getting that ****ed off and faith-based desperate?

Is there perhaps some other faith-based group(s) of pretend-atheists
or cults secretly in charge of Usenet?

Best I can tell, there’s nothing of any pesky Islamic/Muslim sleeper
cells at fault for these sorts of Usenet group stuffing or topic index
stacking kinds of clownish mainstream damage control, just like all
the rich and powerful that haven’t been contributing anything negative
as to their ongoing inflationary cost of energy, or even as to posting
their superior opinions as to whatever negative consequences of
WWIII. As far as they’re concerned, it is simply another win-win for
the old Semite/Zionist Gipper, of which means they don’t have to
contribute on behalf sharing one constructive note or idea for making
anything of energy, food, housing, medical care or education the least
bit better off for the rest of us village idiots.
. - Brad Guth
  #38  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,682
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Apr 21, 12:01 am, Bryan Olson wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.


Fine photos. Thanks for bringing them to my attention.

As for the kook stuff, there I have to laugh in your face. These
photos are entirely consistent with the Apollo record; they'd
debunk "Apollo Hoax" kooks were there any debunking left to be
done.

Count the stars appearing in these "authentic pictures". Looks
like NASA had it right; the kooks, not so much. Of course that
kook stuff was debunked long ago, but still it's nice to see
the real stuff.



http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg


Find more at:


http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/


Good stuff. Say, who's the most notable person on this project to
say that the Apollo missions were fake? Let me guess: everything
the notable scientists and engineers say refutes the Apollo-deniers,
but the kooks dream up a giant conspiracy to explain why all the
evidence is against them.

--
--Bryan


Isn't denial and evidence exclusion a good thing, especially for those
of the Semitic Third Reich (like yourself).
.. - Brad Guth
  #39  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Paul B. Andersen[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

skrev:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/



No stars?
Must be fakes! :-)

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
  #40  
Old April 21st 08 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Paul B. Andersen[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

BradGuth skrev:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...ms.selene.jaxa.

jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_2/hdtv_002_2_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_3/hdtv_002_3_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_4/hdtv_002_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_5/hdtv_002_5_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_6/hdtv_002_6_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_4/hdtv_005_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_2/hdtv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/


You are correct, however those JAXA/Selene images are themselves
modified from their original, mostly in order to eliminate all color
saturation from the lunar mineralogy aspects.

Of the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) or of anything of CNSA(Chang'e No.1) simply
has not generated one worthy frame of their quality video or from
whatever individual FOV as having our physically dark moon looking the
least bit if anything like those NASA/Apollo video/photographic
frames. Clearly those JAXA/Selene images with having the foreground
of the physically dark moon along with mother Earth are of those
officially tampered with, as of prior to their being shared with the
public. We’re not even allowed to see the other 99.9% of such images,
even of those HDTV format with having their moon related color
saturations removed and/or having been sufficiently dynamic range
skewed in order to suit the ongoing demands of all that’s NASA/Apollo.

By now, and at merely one frame per minute, how many tens of thousand
frames from their TC of 10 meter resolution obtained images are
archived, but not being shared.

The greater spectrum sensitivity and vastly improved dynamic range of
those JAXA/Selene cameras, along with their best available optics as
having been quality bandpass coated, is simply of further proof
positive that our NASA team of crack damage-control wizards are in
fact still hard at work, protecting each and every one of their LLPOF
butts for all it’s worth. Of their selective spectrum imaging is what
otherwise proves that our moon offers a wide range of mineralogy
considerations. Yet where’s the observationology worth of their
ongoing mission?

It looks promising that CNSA is going in for the kill, as soon enough
having to orbit at 50 km, of which should do nearly as well as the
JAXA/Selene mission at 100 km, if not slightly better. It seems, of
their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics of this CNSA moon
research and mapping effort is also rather bluish or somewhat purple/
violet saturated from the very same secondary/recoil worth of the raw
solar UV energy that’s unavoidably interacting with that sodium vapor
spewing moon of ours.

I tell these NASA certified wise-guys what; why don’t you pull out a
few dozen originals of them tens of thousands of official NASA/Apollo
Kodak moments, and let us see via digital scanning down to the grain
of that original film as to whatever truth there is to behold, of
their unfiltered images from orbit and from those surface EVAs that
made their moon look as though xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and
of that guano island albedo the likes of 0.65 ~0.75(75%). Then we
each try to explain once again how the hell they managed as of
missions A11, A14 and A16 to have so entirely missed Venus.

The official banishment of all things JAXA/Selene is clearly in the
works; This ongoing damage-control accomplishment of scientific
moderation or banishment against all those opposing the NASA/Apollo
ruse of their mutually perpetrated cold-war century, is what puts
another big-ass MI5/CIA silly grin on NASA’s puppet face, better than
any Bush smirk on behalf of sustaining our NASA/Apollo moon landing
hoax, as though to the same warm and fuzzy extent of those justifying
the Iraq war puts that facial smirk right back on the Bush botoxin
injected face.

In spite of all the mainstream status quo flak, as representing more
of their same old cover-thy-butt damage control, here's more of my
same old dyslexic encrypted rant, as unavoidably polished a wee bit
extra by way of Wikipedia and the JAXA/Selene mission that’s currently
in hiding from those NASA/Apollo MIB (aka Zionist enforcers).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo
“The overall albedo of the Moon is around 7%”, obviously of less than
7% at lowest sunset/sunrise angles and otherwise of greater than 7% at
high noon. A typical unfiltered Kodak moment on the moon while solar
illuminated would be similar to that of recording an open-pit coal
mine. That same Kodak moment using a polarized optical element or
neutral spectrum polarized filter would thereby have recorded the
physically dark moon as though looking much darker than a open-pit
coal mine as viewed by the unfiltered or naked human eye.


http://jeff.medkeff.com/astro/lunar/obs_tech/albedo.htm

Of flat/calm water with the sun at 55 degrees being worth an albedo of
less than 5% w/o polarizing element, and of nearly zero albedo when
taken along with the polarizing element. Go figure as to why so much
of our NASA/Apollo moon looked so unusually 0.650.75 light-gray, to
nearly as moonsuit white for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye
could see, as though looking exactly of what a terrestrial xenon arc
lamp spectrum illuminated guano island would have recorded upon that
exact same film, using the same camera and lens.

Oddly the JAXA/Selene mission hasn’t identified upon any such highly
reflective locations as hosting large items of our bright and shiny
Apollo stuff situated upon that otherwise physically dark and dusty
moon. At first those far superior cameras and superb band-pass coated
optics was getting that bluish saturation of what the raw UV energy
unavoidably creates as secondary/recoil photons, so much so bluish
tint that those images of Earth had their foreground of the moon’s
color pixels nullified into their monochrome version, of essentially
representing those of mostly gray-tone pixels of nearly a B&W format,
of which at least they’d eliminated that otherwise pesky bluish color
saturation factor.

Unfortunately, the Adobe Flash image player used by the JAXA/
KAGUYA(Selene) team is downright pathetic for their image gallery, of
extremely poor image resolution and even at that being terribly slow
to load.
http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/mis...ya/index.shtml

For some reason those terrific 10 meter resolution images and of such
extremely good DR(dynamic range) that’s at least 10 fold better than
film, as such hasn’t recorded upon any of those unusually bright NASA/
Apollo worthy pixels as otherwise surrounded by all them other coal
like physically dark pixels. Their first HDTV images upon arrival are
going to be harder to locate, because those were of the full color
spectrum that included the moon as looking so typically bluish
(exactly as it should).

Notice how the moon’s color saturation has been artificially reduced
down next to zilch, as well as their using minimal DR(dynamic) within
these following images.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200..._e.html#pict02

The JAXA index_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/index_e.html
Notice the strong bluish color saturation worth of their HDTV look at
Earth.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071001_kaguya_e.html

Have yourself another look once again at those original color images
as obtained by their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics, as
for looking so gosh darn bluish/purple saturated, exactly as any close-
up view of our physically dark moon should look while getting so
unavoidably UV saturated.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf

Since those few above images were released for public review, it seems
all the images released since are of those having their color
saturation pixels of that physically dark moon modified so as to
depict the moon as a rather dull charcoal grayish surface that’s
entirely devoid of any worthy mineral deposits of color, or that of
having to show any of that pesky secondary/recoil worth of bluish
color saturation. What the hell gives? and where’s the 10 meter
resolution look-see at those NASA/Apollo landing sites?

This next page of images includes “Figure 1 First Image taken by the
KAGUYA MI” is one of their artificial color saturated examples that’s
nicely created by way of their new and improved image science.

“The color image of the Moon (quasi color image) was composed by
applying red, green and blue respectively to three bands, namely
900nm, 700nm and 415nm, of the nine bands of MI.” (notice how strong
their 415nm (blue) spectrum saturation is)
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html

The solar irradiance spectrum above Earth’s atmosphere (spectural
irradiance in w/m2/nm), of what our naked moon has to deal with.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Solar_Spectrum.png
UVa (360~370 nm) = 450 w/m2 (roughly 10 fold greater intensity than
maximum studio UV blacklight affect), most soft blacklight affects are
of those created at merely 4 w/m2.

Of course, of what little image data we’re given to look at isn’t even
worth 0.1% of images in the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) archives. If you were
trying to hide something on behalf of supporting the NASA/Apollo ruse
or hoax of their moon landings, this JAXA method of excluding the vast
bulk of images and/or of intentionally skewing the color and DR
saturation of those few we were allowed to see (in order to suit all
things NASA/Apollo), is exactly how you’d have to go about doing it.
. - Brad Guth





--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax schoenfeld.one@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 375 3 Weeks Ago 12:49 PM
Apollo XIIIX hoax Ken S. Tucker Physics - General Discussion 26 December 29th 05 10:15 AM
Apollo 13 Hoax??? JKF Physics - General Discussion 6 March 31st 05 08:43 PM
Any scientific evidence proving me wrong? Creative Music Synth [220] Physics - General Discussion 0 February 16th 04 06:16 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ Nathan Jones Physics - General Discussion 12 November 6th 03 05:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Credit Counseling - Ringtones - Free Credit Report - Dan brown