![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apollo, evidence, hoax, proving |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Marcus" wrote in message ... BradGuth wrote: JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated) I knew it! It's a Jewish conspiracy!! Them fellers got their hands in all kinda mischief.... -- http://fast.filespace.org/PaulRMays/Postulate.pdf -- Paul R. Mays "I Believe in Nothing, I Know, I think I Know or I Do Not Know I Never Believe... For to Believe is a Religious Incantation" |
| Ads |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text - The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal. No it doesn't. 1) There were several ground stations recieving signals at the same time. 2) The ground stations would have noticed if the signal wasn't coming from the general direction of the moon. 3) They astronaughts couldn't have stayed on a line between the recieving station and the moon as there were multiple ground stations. At the very least one geostationary sat would have been required per ground station. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 21, 3:22 am, wrote:
On Apr 21, 3:39 pm, Eric Gisse wrote: On Apr 20, 9:27 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Apr 20, 10:19 pm, Eric Gisse wrote: On Apr 20, 9:03 pm, BradGuth wrote: [snip] You are insane. Unlike yourself, at least our evidence is easily peer replicated outside of your NASA/Apollo cult. Too bad you folks still don't have anything to work with, other than whatever's scripted within your NASA/ Apollo Qur'an. . -BradGuth I wonder what other insane conspiracy theories you believe in. Do you have ... unorthodox ... opinions about the war of 1812 as well? Here's a quick overview: By 1810,The House of Rothschild not only had a substantial stake in the Bank of the United States, they were quietly gaining control of the Bank of England. Although foreign owners were not, by law, allowed a say in the day to day operations of the Bank of the United States, there is little doubt that the American share holders and directors were, if not affiliated, complicit in the aims and goals of the Illuminati and their central bankers. In 1811 the charter for the First Bank of America was not renewed. As a result, the House of Rothschild lost millions. This enraged Nathan Rothschild so much that he, almost single handedly fomented the War of 1812. Using his formidable power and influence, he coerced the British Parliament to attempt to retake the Colonies. The first military attempt failed. The second strategy was to divide and conquer. Any serious historian will find that the Civil War was largely stirred up by Rothschild's illuminati agents in the United States. http://www.redicecreations.com/speci...redshield.html That's offering way too much truth and consequences for all of these Semitic brown-nosed minions of their Third Reich. Notice all the mainstream flak that your informative topic has drawn. It's as though one of our lose cannon shots made a direct hit upon some of their mostly Semitic private parts. .. - Brad Guth |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 21, 3:12 am, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text - The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal. In fact there was a massive blunder in one of the shoots where a fake far-away earth could be seen in one window then the real close-earth was briefly seen on another. Bart Sibrel found that one. Google it and you'll probably find it. I think as a brave crew they may have actually made it to/from the moon's L1, because that's technically doable via the Saturn V as having nearly a 30% inert GLOW to deal with, but then I could be wrong. I also believe mission A-13 was a manned effort at accomplishing a brief half+ orbit of our moon, at a somewhat safer orbital distance and just for that one brief radiation exposure from their having been so close to our reactive/anticathode moon. The vast majority of our NASA/Apollo science about our moon was otherwise obtained robotically from orbit, with only limited surface probes that survived their hard/impact landings. .. - Brad Guth |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 21, 11:38 am, "CWatters"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text - The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal. No it doesn't. 1) There were several ground stations recieving signals at the same time. 2) The ground stations would have noticed if the signal wasn't coming from the general direction of the moon. 3) They astronaughts couldn't have stayed on a line between the recieving station and the moon as there were multiple ground stations. At the very least one geostationary sat would have been required per ground station. Where is the moon's L1 ? (duh! general direction of the moon?) .. - Brad Guth |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 21, 8:54 am, (Marcus) wrote:
BradGuth wrote: JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated) I knew it! It's a Jewish conspiracy!! So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner. .. - Brad Guth |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 21, 9:11 am, "Paul Mays" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 10:13 pm, "Paul Mays" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 2:20 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote: Dear john: "john" wrote in message .... ... When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag With 40 years of bombardment by cosmic radiation and UV, it will be two "sticks" and tatters. No flags, no tracks, no LEM, only fake photos and videos. The original video cannot be digitially enhanced as all the 700 boxes of it were "lost". 700 boxes still not found. What monstrous stupidity to keep believing these lies of NASA. No they didn't They lost all moon _rocks_ too. No they didn't Yes they did. This happened around the 80s. It was an excuse to not hand out real rocks for independent analysis. Only tiny dirt samples were consequently given for independent review. Von Braun at NASA went on an expedition to recover small samples of legitamite moon rock from a meteorite at Antarctica. But no moon _rock_ has ever been independently reviewed. They can't get more because they "lost" the plans for that Saturn rockets. No they didn't.. I have a pretty good set that they sent me during the NASA Student Study program in 1965. and at least 2 sets are at NASA in Titusville. Seen em myself in 95. Touched a moon rock. No you didn't. You touched a desert rock and were made to believe it was something more because you are easily misled. A spectral analysis would've revealed otherwise. damn, forgot mine at home. Oh I C... Ive been misled by bunches of folks that I have known, some I've read of, some be reputation and I of course was misled by them and you have the path to enlightenment.. Otay.. I'll pass Designed and installed the Back up power system for the new data center in 95 and if they have a problem finding the plans they could always take a look at the 2 saturn 5's they have on display and in storage to get the details. Manufacturing requires more than a play-do prototype. NASA admits they lost the "blueprints" for most of the Saturn engine, hull and various other important components. hint: that's why they "cant go back" and why their current programme to "go back" is stuck trying to solve problems they supposedly already solved. --http://fast.filespace.org/PaulRMays/Postulate.pdf -- Paul R. Mays "I Believe in Nothing, I Know, I think I Know or I Do Not Know I Never Believe... For to Believe is a Religious Incantation" You're really ****ing off those Semitic troops of our cloaked Third Reich. DARPA (our very own Third Reich collective of Semitic wizards) "This agency brought forth the Saturn 5 rocket, surveillance satellites, the Internet, stealth technology, guided munitions, unmanned aerial vehicles, night vision and the body armor that's in use today," “So what's hot at DARPA right now? Bugs. The creepy, crawly flying kind. The Agency's Microsystems Technology Office is hard at work on HI-MEMS (Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical System), raising real insects filled with electronic circuitry, which could be guided using GPS technology to specific targets via electrical impulses sent to their muscles. These half-bug, half-chip creations - DARPA calls them "insect cyborgs" - would be ideal for surveillance missions, the agency says in a brief description on its website.” Are these fellow spooks, moles and Yids of our MI5/CIA~NASA and of their DARPA protected Third Reich, having a good enough cloak and dagger time yet? Are those Third Reich Semites and of their brown-nosed minions actually getting that ****ed off and faith-based desperate? Is there perhaps some other faith-based group(s) of pretend-atheists or cults secretly in charge of Usenet? Best I can tell, there’s nothing of any pesky Islamic/Muslim sleeper cells at fault for these sorts of Usenet group stuffing or topic index stacking kinds of clownish mainstream damage control, just like all the rich and powerful that haven’t been contributing anything negative as to their ongoing inflationary cost of energy, or even as to posting their superior opinions as to whatever negative consequences of WWIII. As far as they’re concerned, it is simply another win-win for the old Semite/Zionist Gipper, of which means they don’t have to contribute on behalf sharing one constructive note or idea for making anything of energy, food, housing, medical care or education the least bit better off for the rest of us village idiots. . - Brad Guth |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
skrev:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ No stars? Must be fakes! :-) -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
BradGuth skrev:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...ms.selene.jaxa. jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_2/hdtv_002_2_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_3/hdtv_002_3_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_4/hdtv_002_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_5/hdtv_002_5_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_6/hdtv_002_6_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_4/hdtv_005_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_2/hdtv_005_2_l.jpg Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ You are correct, however those JAXA/Selene images are themselves modified from their original, mostly in order to eliminate all color saturation from the lunar mineralogy aspects. Of the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) or of anything of CNSA(Chang'e No.1) simply has not generated one worthy frame of their quality video or from whatever individual FOV as having our physically dark moon looking the least bit if anything like those NASA/Apollo video/photographic frames. Clearly those JAXA/Selene images with having the foreground of the physically dark moon along with mother Earth are of those officially tampered with, as of prior to their being shared with the public. We’re not even allowed to see the other 99.9% of such images, even of those HDTV format with having their moon related color saturations removed and/or having been sufficiently dynamic range skewed in order to suit the ongoing demands of all that’s NASA/Apollo. By now, and at merely one frame per minute, how many tens of thousand frames from their TC of 10 meter resolution obtained images are archived, but not being shared. The greater spectrum sensitivity and vastly improved dynamic range of those JAXA/Selene cameras, along with their best available optics as having been quality bandpass coated, is simply of further proof positive that our NASA team of crack damage-control wizards are in fact still hard at work, protecting each and every one of their LLPOF butts for all it’s worth. Of their selective spectrum imaging is what otherwise proves that our moon offers a wide range of mineralogy considerations. Yet where’s the observationology worth of their ongoing mission? It looks promising that CNSA is going in for the kill, as soon enough having to orbit at 50 km, of which should do nearly as well as the JAXA/Selene mission at 100 km, if not slightly better. It seems, of their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics of this CNSA moon research and mapping effort is also rather bluish or somewhat purple/ violet saturated from the very same secondary/recoil worth of the raw solar UV energy that’s unavoidably interacting with that sodium vapor spewing moon of ours. I tell these NASA certified wise-guys what; why don’t you pull out a few dozen originals of them tens of thousands of official NASA/Apollo Kodak moments, and let us see via digital scanning down to the grain of that original film as to whatever truth there is to behold, of their unfiltered images from orbit and from those surface EVAs that made their moon look as though xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and of that guano island albedo the likes of 0.65 ~0.75(75%). Then we each try to explain once again how the hell they managed as of missions A11, A14 and A16 to have so entirely missed Venus. The official banishment of all things JAXA/Selene is clearly in the works; This ongoing damage-control accomplishment of scientific moderation or banishment against all those opposing the NASA/Apollo ruse of their mutually perpetrated cold-war century, is what puts another big-ass MI5/CIA silly grin on NASA’s puppet face, better than any Bush smirk on behalf of sustaining our NASA/Apollo moon landing hoax, as though to the same warm and fuzzy extent of those justifying the Iraq war puts that facial smirk right back on the Bush botoxin injected face. In spite of all the mainstream status quo flak, as representing more of their same old cover-thy-butt damage control, here's more of my same old dyslexic encrypted rant, as unavoidably polished a wee bit extra by way of Wikipedia and the JAXA/Selene mission that’s currently in hiding from those NASA/Apollo MIB (aka Zionist enforcers). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo “The overall albedo of the Moon is around 7%”, obviously of less than 7% at lowest sunset/sunrise angles and otherwise of greater than 7% at high noon. A typical unfiltered Kodak moment on the moon while solar illuminated would be similar to that of recording an open-pit coal mine. That same Kodak moment using a polarized optical element or neutral spectrum polarized filter would thereby have recorded the physically dark moon as though looking much darker than a open-pit coal mine as viewed by the unfiltered or naked human eye. http://jeff.medkeff.com/astro/lunar/obs_tech/albedo.htm Of flat/calm water with the sun at 55 degrees being worth an albedo of less than 5% w/o polarizing element, and of nearly zero albedo when taken along with the polarizing element. Go figure as to why so much of our NASA/Apollo moon looked so unusually 0.650.75 light-gray, to nearly as moonsuit white for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye could see, as though looking exactly of what a terrestrial xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated guano island would have recorded upon that exact same film, using the same camera and lens. Oddly the JAXA/Selene mission hasn’t identified upon any such highly reflective locations as hosting large items of our bright and shiny Apollo stuff situated upon that otherwise physically dark and dusty moon. At first those far superior cameras and superb band-pass coated optics was getting that bluish saturation of what the raw UV energy unavoidably creates as secondary/recoil photons, so much so bluish tint that those images of Earth had their foreground of the moon’s color pixels nullified into their monochrome version, of essentially representing those of mostly gray-tone pixels of nearly a B&W format, of which at least they’d eliminated that otherwise pesky bluish color saturation factor. Unfortunately, the Adobe Flash image player used by the JAXA/ KAGUYA(Selene) team is downright pathetic for their image gallery, of extremely poor image resolution and even at that being terribly slow to load. http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/mis...ya/index.shtml For some reason those terrific 10 meter resolution images and of such extremely good DR(dynamic range) that’s at least 10 fold better than film, as such hasn’t recorded upon any of those unusually bright NASA/ Apollo worthy pixels as otherwise surrounded by all them other coal like physically dark pixels. Their first HDTV images upon arrival are going to be harder to locate, because those were of the full color spectrum that included the moon as looking so typically bluish (exactly as it should). Notice how the moon’s color saturation has been artificially reduced down next to zilch, as well as their using minimal DR(dynamic) within these following images. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200..._e.html#pict02 The JAXA index_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/index_e.html Notice the strong bluish color saturation worth of their HDTV look at Earth. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071001_kaguya_e.html Have yourself another look once again at those original color images as obtained by their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics, as for looking so gosh darn bluish/purple saturated, exactly as any close- up view of our physically dark moon should look while getting so unavoidably UV saturated. http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf Since those few above images were released for public review, it seems all the images released since are of those having their color saturation pixels of that physically dark moon modified so as to depict the moon as a rather dull charcoal grayish surface that’s entirely devoid of any worthy mineral deposits of color, or that of having to show any of that pesky secondary/recoil worth of bluish color saturation. What the hell gives? and where’s the 10 meter resolution look-see at those NASA/Apollo landing sites? This next page of images includes “Figure 1 First Image taken by the KAGUYA MI” is one of their artificial color saturated examples that’s nicely created by way of their new and improved image science. “The color image of the Moon (quasi color image) was composed by applying red, green and blue respectively to three bands, namely 900nm, 700nm and 415nm, of the nine bands of MI.” (notice how strong their 415nm (blue) spectrum saturation is) http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html The solar irradiance spectrum above Earth’s atmosphere (spectural irradiance in w/m2/nm), of what our naked moon has to deal with. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Solar_Spectrum.png UVa (360~370 nm) = 450 w/m2 (roughly 10 fold greater intensity than maximum studio UV blacklight affect), most soft blacklight affects are of those created at merely 4 w/m2. Of course, of what little image data we’re given to look at isn’t even worth 0.1% of images in the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) archives. If you were trying to hide something on behalf of supporting the NASA/Apollo ruse or hoax of their moon landings, this JAXA method of excluding the vast bulk of images and/or of intentionally skewing the color and DR saturation of those few we were allowed to see (in order to suit all things NASA/Apollo), is exactly how you’d have to go about doing it. . - Brad Guth -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More evidence proving Apollo Hoax | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 375 | 3 Weeks Ago 12:49 PM |
| Apollo XIIIX hoax | Ken S. Tucker | Physics - General Discussion | 26 | December 29th 05 10:15 AM |
| Apollo 13 Hoax??? | JKF | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | March 31st 05 08:43 PM |
| Any scientific evidence proving me wrong? | Creative Music Synth [220] | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 16th 04 06:16 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | November 6th 03 05:58 AM |