More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

**schoenfeld.one@gmail.com**

**Richard Henry**

On Apr 20, 9:04*pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

**john[_2_]**

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

**schoenfeld.one@gmail.com**

On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:
On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

**N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_1126_]**

Dear john:

"john" wrote in message
...
....
When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would
actually be some evidence.

I want to see the flag

With 40 years of bombardment by cosmic radiation and UV, it will
be two "sticks" and tatters.

David A. Smith

**john[_2_]**

On Apr 20, 10:15 pm, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms...

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

so is that why God killed jfk?

**Eric Gisse**

On Apr 20, 8:04*pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Care to let the rest of us in on the joke?

**Eric Gisse**

On Apr 20, 8:15*pm, wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote:

On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:

Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms....

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Oh.

When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some
evidence.

I want to see the flag

Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag,
there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned
craft.

The Apollo programme was a total hoax.

What unmanned craft?

**BradGuth**

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

You are correct, however those JAXA/Selene images are themselves
modified from their original, mostly in order to eliminate all color
saturation from the lunar mineralogy aspects.

Of the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) or of anything of CNSA(Chang'e No.1) simply
has not generated one worthy frame of their quality video or from
whatever individual FOV as having our physically dark moon looking the
least bit if anything like those NASA/Apollo video/photographic
frames. Clearly those JAXA/Selene images with having the foreground
of the physically dark moon along with mother Earth are of those
officially tampered with, as of prior to their being shared with the
public. We’re not even allowed to see the other 99.9% of such images,
even of those HDTV format with having their moon related color
saturations removed and/or having been sufficiently dynamic range
skewed in order to suit the ongoing demands of all that’s NASA/Apollo.

By now, and at merely one frame per minute, how many tens of thousand
frames from their TC of 10 meter resolution obtained images are
archived, but not being shared.

The greater spectrum sensitivity and vastly improved dynamic range of
those JAXA/Selene cameras, along with their best available optics as
having been quality bandpass coated, is simply of further proof
positive that our NASA team of crack damage-control wizards are in
fact still hard at work, protecting each and every one of their LLPOF
butts for all it’s worth. Of their selective spectrum imaging is what
otherwise proves that our moon offers a wide range of mineralogy
considerations. Yet where’s the observationology worth of their
ongoing mission?

It looks promising that CNSA is going in for the kill, as soon enough
having to orbit at 50 km, of which should do nearly as well as the
JAXA/Selene mission at 100 km, if not slightly better. It seems, of
their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics of this CNSA moon
research and mapping effort is also rather bluish or somewhat purple/
violet saturated from the very same secondary/recoil worth of the raw
solar UV energy that’s unavoidably interacting with that sodium vapor
spewing moon of ours.

I tell these NASA certified wise-guys what; why don’t you pull out a
few dozen originals of them tens of thousands of official NASA/Apollo
Kodak moments, and let us see via digital scanning down to the grain
of that original film as to whatever truth there is to behold, of
their unfiltered images from orbit and from those surface EVAs that
made their moon look as though xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and
of that guano island albedo the likes of 0.65 ~0.75(75%). Then we
each try to explain once again how the hell they managed as of
missions A11, A14 and A16 to have so entirely missed Venus.

The official banishment of all things JAXA/Selene is clearly in the
works; This ongoing damage-control accomplishment of scientific
moderation or banishment against all those opposing the NASA/Apollo
ruse of their mutually perpetrated cold-war century, is what puts
another big-ass MI5/CIA silly grin on NASA’s puppet face, better than
any Bush smirk on behalf of sustaining our NASA/Apollo moon landing
hoax, as though to the same warm and fuzzy extent of those justifying
the Iraq war puts that facial smirk right back on the Bush botoxin
injected face.

In spite of all the mainstream status quo flak, as representing more
of their same old cover-thy-butt damage control, here's more of my
same old dyslexic encrypted rant, as unavoidably polished a wee bit
extra by way of Wikipedia and the JAXA/Selene mission that’s currently
in hiding from those NASA/Apollo MIB (aka Zionist enforcers).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo
“The overall albedo of the Moon is around 7%”, obviously of less than
7% at lowest sunset/sunrise angles and otherwise of greater than 7% at
high noon. A typical unfiltered Kodak moment on the moon while solar
illuminated would be similar to that of recording an open-pit coal
mine. That same Kodak moment using a polarized optical element or
neutral spectrum polarized filter would thereby have recorded the
physically dark moon as though looking much darker than a open-pit
coal mine as viewed by the unfiltered or naked human eye.

Of flat/calm water with the sun at 55 degrees being worth an albedo of
less than 5% w/o polarizing element, and of nearly zero albedo when
taken along with the polarizing element. Go figure as to why so much
of our NASA/Apollo moon looked so unusually 0.650.75 light-gray, to
nearly as moonsuit white for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye
could see, as though looking exactly of what a terrestrial xenon arc
lamp spectrum illuminated guano island would have recorded upon that
exact same film, using the same camera and lens.

Oddly the JAXA/Selene mission hasn’t identified upon any such highly
reflective locations as hosting large items of our bright and shiny
Apollo stuff situated upon that otherwise physically dark and dusty
moon. At first those far superior cameras and superb band-pass coated
optics was getting that bluish saturation of what the raw UV energy
unavoidably creates as secondary/recoil photons, so much so bluish
tint that those images of Earth had their foreground of the moon’s
color pixels nullified into their monochrome version, of essentially
representing those of mostly gray-tone pixels of nearly a B&W format,
of which at least they’d eliminated that otherwise pesky bluish color
saturation factor.

Unfortunately, the Adobe Flash image player used by the JAXA/
KAGUYA(Selene) team is downright pathetic for their image gallery, of
extremely poor image resolution and even at that being terribly slow
to load.
http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/mis...ya/index.shtml

For some reason those terrific 10 meter resolution images and of such
extremely good DR(dynamic range) that’s at least 10 fold better than
film, as such hasn’t recorded upon any of those unusually bright NASA/
Apollo worthy pixels as otherwise surrounded by all them other coal
like physically dark pixels. Their first HDTV images upon arrival are
going to be harder to locate, because those were of the full color
spectrum that included the moon as looking so typically bluish
(exactly as it should).

Notice how the moon’s color saturation has been artificially reduced
down next to zilch, as well as their using minimal DR(dynamic) within
these following images.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200..._e.html#pict02

The JAXA index_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/index_e.html
Notice the strong bluish color saturation worth of their HDTV look at
Earth.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071001_kaguya_e.html

Have yourself another look once again at those original color images
as obtained by their quality cameras and bandpass coated optics, as
for looking so gosh darn bluish/purple saturated, exactly as any close-
up view of our physically dark moon should look while getting so
unavoidably UV saturated.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071009_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf

Since those few above images were released for public review, it seems
all the images released since are of those having their color
saturation pixels of that physically dark moon modified so as to
depict the moon as a rather dull charcoal grayish surface that’s
entirely devoid of any worthy mineral deposits of color, or that of
having to show any of that pesky secondary/recoil worth of bluish
color saturation. What the hell gives? and where’s the 10 meter
resolution look-see at those NASA/Apollo landing sites?

This next page of images includes “Figure 1 First Image taken by the
KAGUYA MI” is one of their artificial color saturated examples that’s
nicely created by way of their new and improved image science.

“The color image of the Moon (quasi color image) was composed by
applying red, green and blue respectively to three bands, namely
900nm, 700nm and 415nm, of the nine bands of MI.” (notice how strong
their 415nm (blue) spectrum saturation is)
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html

The solar irradiance spectrum above Earth’s atmosphere (spectural
irradiance in w/m2/nm), of what our naked moon has to deal with.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Solar_Spectrum.png
UVa (360~370 nm) = 450 w/m2 (roughly 10 fold greater intensity than
maximum studio UV blacklight affect), most soft blacklight affects are
of those created at merely 4 w/m2.

Of course, of what little image data we’re given to look at isn’t even
worth 0.1% of images in the JAXA/KAGUYA(Selene) archives. If you were
trying to hide something on behalf of supporting the NASA/Apollo ruse
or hoax of their moon landings, this JAXA method of excluding the vast
bulk of images and/or of intentionally skewing the color and DR
saturation of those few we were allowed to see (in order to suit all
things NASA/Apollo), is exactly how you’d have to go about doing it.
. - Brad Guth

**BradGuth**

On Apr 20, 9:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when
I was in the Military.

You intercepted a standard S-band transponder (aka Chapel Bell)
provided signal.

BTW, where's the moon L1 ? (that's a trick question)

While you're at it; where's Venus? (not a trick question)
.. - Brad Guth

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax	schoenfeld.one@gmail.com	Physics - General Discussion	375	August 12th 08 12:49 PM
Apollo XIIIX hoax	Ken S. Tucker	Physics - General Discussion	26	December 29th 05 10:15 AM
Apollo 13 Hoax???	JKF	Physics - General Discussion	6	March 31st 05 08:43 PM
Any scientific evidence proving me wrong?	Creative Music Synth [220]	Physics - General Discussion	0	February 16th 04 06:16 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ	Nathan Jones	Physics - General Discussion	12	November 6th 03 05:58 AM