Moon meteorite (nearly dark as coal)

I have recently uncovered several closely associated meteorites, or
at least pieces of the same encounter that sent them towards Earth and
into my garden, that could very well be those of a lunar meteorite.

Lunar Meteorites or Lunaites / Labenne Meteorites :
Besides the matter of peer replicated fact that on average our moon’s
physical surface is nearly as dark as coal, and yet most of those
Apollo rocks and crystal like soil were for the most part of a medium
to light grayish form of basalt, with only somewhat minor portions of
those coal like dark basalt considerations.

I seem to have a few of my very own moon rocks (via lunar meteorites),
as should most anyone if they’d care to look around their two left
dumbfounded feet, though possibly my most recent fines are merely
parts of whatever could have impacted our moon.

Each of these mostly basalt items are looking exactly as though having
been reentry fired, as having been nicely glazed hot enough to have
melted one or more sides.

One of the two larger items is nearly a clean solid (as though a blow-
out from a geode rock), with one side fully fused and the bulk of its
remainder as the deep brownish olive-green basalt, and of course
having those pesky magnetic minerals.

There are no apparent sediment layers or indications of anything
terrestrial, however on the larger piece there’s quite possibly a
nickel like substance plus the back side showing some deep brownish
pockets or composites of equally hard as basalt rock or glassy fused
substance (could be a mix of iron and manganese).

These meteorites are not as of yet Labenne certified, though otherwise
very much basalt dark as coal when wet (but noticeably heavier) with a
good magnetic mineral content and when dry in good daylight seem a
touch olive-green. At any rate, these each seem potentially related
to one another, mostly because they were found within the same square
meter of our extremely rocky soil.

There are some fairly interesting items or unusual looking things
trapped along side or even a bit inside of the crevices and multiple
pores. (far more interesting than anything contributed by our supposed
NASA/Apollo missions)

BTW, a while back we heard the sonic crack (very sharp/crisp bang) as
of roughly 6 months ago, and only just now not got around to doing our
gardening where these meteorites (possibly lunaites) were discovered.

A little friendly warning for those thinking naughty thoughts; for
the moment these are in a safe/hidden place, and I’m packing heat.
Meaning, you really should call (253-8576061) before stopping by for
any personal look-see.
. – Brad Guth


On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of theLunarsurface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

ah wrote:
www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:34:37 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:20:21 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more
wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
crickets

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

ah wrote:
www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:42:19 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On May 14, 4:37 pm, www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 00:27:18
wrote:



The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets
more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
crickets

crickets
non-sequitur snipped

crickets prevail

crickets
crickets

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

so, Moon looks bright at night, though "almost as dark
as coal," because it's the brightest thing that you're looking at ...
which also explains why the suits are so blinding, but, even so,
the stars would not generally be visible in the *exposures*
-- it's elementary photography stuff, common to all night-time
exposures
of "foreground objects" including moonscape --
between the suits & the "coal."

your other comments come in such a torrent, it's hard
to get any sense of them, re polarization e.g. but, see,
it's all relative to the *exposure*, which is made
so as to get a middling contrast of the data, and
unpolarized glare applies to every thing on Moon.

as for how UV affects the surface of Moon, I don't see,
how that could be very much, since there's little erosion:
all of the surface has been undisturbed & exposed
to UV for eons.

so, how can anyone seriously compare "natural versus artificial
lighting"
in a photograph, comparitiviely, whether or not the photographic set-
up
is known?

don't just photocopy my queries & then make your frenzied biolerplate
of "analysis." answer, one query at a time, the query related
in your own terms, conversationally.

Coal is actually much darker than our moon, at roughly an albedo of
0.1 or 10% reflective, whereas our dusty old moon average albedo is
0.11 or 11%. *Now if Venus were in orbit of Earth so as to appear the
same visual size as our moon, we’d be literally blinded by the light.

Of course when that lunar terrain gets viewed and/or photographed
through a polarized optical element (such as while you’re situated
upon the surface of that nearly coal like moon), as such would have
made that coal look even darker, and otherwise rather especially
contrasty with having such a singular and nearly point-source of
illumination as represented by our raw sun illuminating upon our naked
moon that’s unavoidably reactive to such UV energy. *But then if you
were a fifth grader you’d already know all of that.

Only the superior dynamic range of the JAXA/Selene TC(terrain camera)
makes the best of that otherwise extremely contrasty situation, as
well as their being able to extract or exclude the horrific amount of
that bluish/purple spectrum saturated environment, that’s directly
caused by the secondary/recoil from all of that raw UV energy, and
their HDTV cameras are simply having to entirely exclude the
mineralogy worth of lunar surface colors because of the saturation of
UV that skews most everything into the bluish/purple hue.

BTW, the raw solar illumination as having loads of UV is nothing at
all like the xenon arc lamp spectrum which illuminated the NASA/Apollo
moon, that which for the most part seemed to look almost exactly like
a modified terrestrial guano island that’s oddly now a UN member (made
so shortly after their loyal assistance).

Secondly, a fully 3D interactive version of most any orbital simulator
can place your eyes as though situated upon any planet or moon at any
given location per given time, as well as for looking off in any given
direction, along with most any specified FOV. *Our DARPA/NASA has
always had this capability since the invention of the supercomputer,

thus:
did some reading, somewhere, and found that
it was actually Maxwell who seperated the "scalar" part
of Hamilton's lingo from quaternions. kind of interesting,
when you think about Kaluza-Klein & strings ...
may have driven Einstein completely nuts.

thus quoth:
We develop quaternionic analysis using as a guiding principle
representation theory of various real forms of the conformal
group. We first review the Cauchy-Fueter and Poisson formulas
and explain their representation theoretic meaning. The
requirement of unitarity of representations leads us to the
extensions of these formulas in Minkowski space, which can
be viewed as another real form of quaternions. Representation
theory also suggests a quaternionic version of the Cauchy formula
for the second order pole. Remarkably, the derivative appearing
in the complex case is replaced by the Maxwell equations in the
quaternionic counterpart. We also uncover the connection between
quaternionic analysis and various structures in quantum mechanics
and quantum field theory, such as the spectrum of the hydrogen
atom,
polarization of vacuum, and one-loop Feynman integrals. We also
make some further conjectures. The main goal of this and our
subsequent paper is to revive quaternionic analysis and to show
profound relations between quaternionic analysis, representation
theory and four-dimensional physics.

Finally, here's a clue for the Pythagorean pentagram puzzle.
To prove that Phi = 1 + 1/Phi,
show the length of the longest red interval here is the sum of the
lengths of the two shorter ones:
26) James Dolan and John Baez, annotated picture of Pythagorean
pentagram, http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/golden..._pentagram.jpg
For more on the golden ratio, try "week203". For more on its
relation to the dodecahedron, see "week241".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote of the Week:
There is geometry in the humming of the strings, there is music in
the spacing of the spheres. - Pythagoras

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 8 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
crickets

so, now, I guess, you know what one of the problems is
with "sim-based ed" ... or, at least,
sim-based orbital mechanics, which I have never used.

PS: what RK below-said about Leibniz is dumb, vis-a-vu Nude-ton.

Venus is a completely [100%] variable star; so,

Is your fully interactive 3D orbital simulator broken, or is it merely

A half smart 5th grader could run a PC/MAC based orbital simulator,

thus:
always to fight the reification of fuzzee Q math,
a la the predominant Copenhagenskool of everything & the undead cat
-- meow; am I dead/yet/or/not/isthataquantuminyourrocket?... so,
if *Minkowski* had lived, longer, he would have seen through
the endless hype of timespace, which is merely phase-space, as used
in electronics, lagrangians, hamiltonians & quaternions --
the original timespace via Lancsoz' -Variational Mechanics_ (Dover
Pubs.),
AFAIK with my vast pedagogical resources. EPR dyssolves,
when Minkowski's dictum is seen as an extemporaneious exhuberance;
he was really good with n-dim. discrete math, though.

So why was it that Einstein took the lead in seeing gravitation as a
manifestation of curvature in the spacetime manifold? Hilbert did not
do that first. He did it better, though because he was the better
mathematician. Feynman pointed out in volume two of his famous set of
lectures, that mathematicians for all their smarts generally do not
advance physics. Newton was a major exception. He co-invented calculus
to deal with motion. His motivation was physics, not mathematics.
Leibniz also invented calculus but he did not originate any major
theories of physics.

Maxwell was another brilliant mathematican but he was a physicist first.
I think if Maxwell had lived another ten years he would have
accomplished what Lorentz did and who would have derived the dependence
of time on velocity. Maxwell, by 1865 was moving away from aether (he
domoted aether to a pedagoical concept, a mind trick, as it were). If he
had lived long enough he would have got to where Lorentz and Poincare
got, but earlier. It was Maxwell's approach that inspired Einstein.

thus:
so, what's the math for this nonconvex shape
of equigonal trigona hint ??
http://www.designboom.com/contempora...apertutti.html

thus quoth:
Darfur is Sudan's poorest, wildest region. One of the Islamic World's
first anti-colonial movements, known in the west as the Dervishes,
burst from the wastes of Darfur in the 1880s. Led by the fiery
"Mahdi," the Dervishes drove the British imperialists from Sudan, an
event immortalized in the splendid Victorian novel, Four Feathers. The
Dervishes took Khartoum, slaying Britain's proconsul, Sir Charles
"Chinese" Gordon.
The "martyred" Gordon's death roused a storm in Britain, resulting in
a punitive army sent up the Nile (including the young Winston
Churchill) that destroyed the Dervish army at Omdurman. But remote
Darfur remained a hotbed of rebellion.
Arms and money
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...c870c2c 9126f

thus:
well, not a moment too soon,
to decelerate the ethanol-fed dustbowl
in the Midwest ... hopefully.
http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/p...articleID=1613

thus:
otherwise, coal's a very (?) important feedstock. so,
what is the sustainable production of natural gas & natural oil?...
Atoms, Machiavelli, Machiavelli & Oil need a figure
for the venture ads!... coal, we know from its pre-fossil
formations,
to be produced catastrophically; the burial
of whole, swampy ecosystems.
Yucca Flats is a farce majeur, even if
there's any thing left to bury, by the time it'd open, or
by noon, Pacific Time.

thus:
the Brooklyn Bridge is a powerful metaphor, but
it has to be told in the context of its manifestation
as David McCullough's first production for PBS:
his first, big SALE, in other word,
to the "eastern liberal establishment" of Wall Street,
the District of Columbia and protege Ken "Civil War Jazzbo" Burns.

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 9 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

clearest example is with "firstperson shooters,"
giving rise to vertigo, which is also the #1 factor
in the pilot-sighted UFO, called, Venus.

so, now, I guess, you know what one of the problems is
with "sim-based ed" ... or, at least,
sim-based orbital mechanics, which I have never used.

thus:
the Brooklyn Bridge is a powerful metaphor, but
it has to be told in the context of its manifestation
as David McCullough's first production for PBS:
his first, big SALE, in other word,
to the "eastern liberal establishment" of Wall Street,
the District of Columbia and protege Ken "Civil War Jazzbo" Burns.

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 9 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

I meant, the biggest factor in the pilot-sightings
of their fore-most-seen UFO, Venus; there are times,
when astronauts on anywhere could not see it
by naked eye; that is, without suitably occluding the nearby Sun
-- it's nearby always in angular terms, peri-Earth!

clearest example is with "firstperson shooters,"
giving rise to vertigo, which is also the #1 factor
in the pilot-sighted UFO, called, Venus.

thus:
the partials commute, and do you still need
to use the trilateral inequality?

how about the tetrahedral analogs?

Yes. For example, this follows easily from another fact: If v is
harmonic on R^n and int |v|^2 infinity then v = 0. To get
the first fact from the second consider v = partial derivative
of u.

So assume v is harmonic and square-integrable. For any
r 0

v(0) = (c/r^n) int_{|x|r} v(r)

so the Schwarz inequality shows that (with a different c)

|v(0)| = (c/r^n) r^(n/2).

Letting r - infinity shows that v(0) = 0; similarly
v(x) = 0 for other x.

Very nice proof. I didn't though that if u is harmonic then all its partial
derivative are harmonic too.

That follows trivially from the fact that partial
derivatives commute *assuming* you know that a
harmonic function has derivatives of all orders.

--who killed Schroedinger's puppy?!
thus: so, what's the math for this nonconvex shape of equigonal
trigona ??
http://www.designboom.com/contempora...apertutti.html

thus quoth:
Darfur is Sudan's poorest, wildest region. One of the Islamic World's
first anti-colonial
movements, known in the west as the Dervishes, burst from the wastes
of Darfur in the
1880s. Led by the fiery "Mahdi," the Dervishes drove the British
imperialists from Sudan,
an event immortalized in the splendid Victorian novel, Four Feathers.
The Dervishes took
Khartoum, slaying Britain's proconsul, Sir Charles "Chinese" Gordon.
The "martyred" Gordon's death roused a storm in Britain, resulting in
a punitive army
sent up the Nile (including the young Winston Churchill) that
destroyed the Dervish army
at Omdurman. But remote Darfur remained a hotbed of rebellion.
Arms and money
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c.../f47126a9738aa
095/fa18c870c2c9126f?hl=en&lnk=st&q=darfur#fa18c870c2c 9126f

thus:
well, not a moment too soon,
to decelerate the ethanol-fed dustbowl
in the Midwest ... hopefully.
http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/p...articleID=1613

thus:
otherwise, coal's a very (?) important feedstock. so,
what is the sustainable production of natural gas & natural oil?...
Atoms, Machiavelli, Machiavelli & Oil need a figure
for the venture ads!... coal, we know from its pre-fossil
formations,
to be produced catastrophically; the burial
of whole, swampy ecosystems.
Yucca Flats is a farce majeur, even if
there's any thing left to bury, by the time it'd open, or
by noon, Pacific Time.

thus:
the Brooklyn Bridge is a powerful metaphor, but
it has to be told in the context of its manifestation
as David McCullough's first production for PBS:
his first, big SALE, in other word,
to the "eastern liberal establishment" of Wall Street,
the District of Columbia and protege Ken "Civil War Jazzbo" Burns.

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 9 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

Venus is not a star. I shall repeat; Venus is NOT a STAR.
. - . Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


On May 27, 1:41 pm, Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum
wrote:
so, Moon looks bright at night, though "almost as dark
as coal," because it's the brightest thing that you're looking at ...
which also explains why the suits are so blinding, but, even so,
the stars would not generally be visible in the *exposures*
-- it's elementary photography stuff, common to all night-time
exposures
of "foreground objects" including moonscape --
between the suits & the "coal."

your other comments come in such a torrent, it's hard
to get any sense of them, re polarization e.g. but, see,
it's all relative to the *exposure*, which is made
so as to get a middling contrast of the data, and
unpolarized glare applies to every thing on Moon.

as for how UV affects the surface of Moon, I don't see,
how that could be very much, since there's little erosion:
all of the surface has been undisturbed & exposed
to UV for eons.

so, how can anyone seriously compare "natural versus artificial
lighting"
in a photograph, comparitiviely, whether or not the photographic set-
up
is known?

don't just photocopy my queries & then make your frenzied biolerplate
of "analysis." answer, one query at a time, the query related
in your own terms, conversationally.



Coal is actually much darker than our moon, at roughly an albedo of
0.1 or 10% reflective, whereas our dusty old moon average albedo is
0.11 or 11%. Now if Venus were in orbit of Earth so as to appear the
same visual size as our moon, we’d be literally blinded by the light.

Of course when that lunar terrain gets viewed and/or photographed
through a polarized optical element (such as while you’re situated
upon the surface of that nearly coal like moon), as such would have
made that coal look even darker, and otherwise rather especially
contrasty with having such a singular and nearly point-source of
illumination as represented by our raw sun illuminating upon our naked
moon that’s unavoidably reactive to such UV energy. But then if you
were a fifth grader you’d already know all of that.

Only the superior dynamic range of the JAXA/Selene TC(terrain camera)
makes the best of that otherwise extremely contrasty situation, as
well as their being able to extract or exclude the horrific amount of
that bluish/purple spectrum saturated environment, that’s directly
caused by the secondary/recoil from all of that raw UV energy, and
their HDTV cameras are simply having to entirely exclude the
mineralogy worth of lunar surface colors because of the saturation of
UV that skews most everything into the bluish/purple hue.

BTW, the raw solar illumination as having loads of UV is nothing at
all like the xenon arc lamp spectrum which illuminated the NASA/Apollo
moon, that which for the most part seemed to look almost exactly like
a modified terrestrial guano island that’s oddly now a UN member (made
so shortly after their loyal assistance).

Secondly, a fully 3D interactive version of most any orbital simulator
can place your eyes as though situated upon any planet or moon at any
given location per given time, as well as for looking off in any given
direction, along with most any specified FOV. Our DARPA/NASA has
always had this capability since the invention of the supercomputer,

thus:
did some reading, somewhere, and found that
it was actually Maxwell who seperated the "scalar" part
of Hamilton's lingo from quaternions. kind of interesting,
when you think about Kaluza-Klein & strings ...
may have driven Einstein completely nuts.

thus quoth:
We develop quaternionic analysis using as a guiding principle
representation theory of various real forms of the conformal
group. We first review the Cauchy-Fueter and Poisson formulas
and explain their representation theoretic meaning. The
requirement of unitarity of representations leads us to the
extensions of these formulas in Minkowski space, which can
be viewed as another real form of quaternions. Representation
theory also suggests a quaternionic version of the Cauchy formula
for the second order pole. Remarkably, the derivative appearing
in the complex case is replaced by the Maxwell equations in the
quaternionic counterpart. We also uncover the connection between
quaternionic analysis and various structures in quantum mechanics
and quantum field theory, such as the spectrum of the hydrogen
atom,
polarization of vacuum, and one-loop Feynman integrals. We also
make some further conjectures. The main goal of this and our
subsequent paper is to revive quaternionic analysis and to show
profound relations between quaternionic analysis, representation
theory and four-dimensional physics.

Finally, here's a clue for the Pythagorean pentagram puzzle.
To prove that Phi = 1 + 1/Phi,
show the length of the longest red interval here is the sum of the
lengths of the two shorter ones:
26) James Dolan and John Baez, annotated picture of Pythagorean
pentagram,http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/golden..._pentagram.jpg
For more on the golden ratio, try "week203". For more on its
relation to the dodecahedron, see "week241".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote of the Week:
There is geometry in the humming of the strings, there is music in
the spacing of the spheres. - Pythagoras

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...

Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 8 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

On Jun 3, 10:14 am, Disneygeek wrote:
On May 1, 1:08 am, Tonico wrote:



On May 1, 7:39 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 27, 10:52 am, BradGuth wrote:

.................................................. ...

Only as of this year has another government outside of the cloak and
dagger grasp of our DARPA and of their army of STR spook/mole minions
(aka MIB if you like), had the capability of going in for the kill.

What's your best swag as to the remaining time our NASA/Apollo fiasco
has left?
. - Brad Guth

Why are devout Jews like Saul Levy so gosh darn touchy about our NASA
and of their grand Apollo ruse/sting of our mutually perpetrated cold-
war Century?

Besides, how much of our DARPA/USAID isn't Jewish?
. - Brad Guth-

************************************************** ************

Schoenfeld-Bradguth: a pair truly from heaven. They complement each
other in several, pretty funny sometimes, ways. They both are trolls
that love to spit nonsenses in the NG from time to time, but whereas
one can see that Schoenfeld is as clever as two bricks from the London
Bridge and serves only to begin the show, Bradguth plays the "wise"
guy, and tries pretty pathetically to give a "scientific" basis to his
stupidities.

The best part is when Brad seasons his posts with antisemitism and
deep hatred towards anything daring to disagree with his nonsenses.
That "brown nose minions" thing is hilarious, and something we all
must be grateful for when trying to take a rest from everyday's work.

Were you around when he was calling everyone "incest Borg clones?"

Good times.

Even better yet; try Zionist/Nazi DARPA.

.. - . Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth