George Hammond wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:53:58 -0700 (PDT), Titus
wrote:

On May 7, 8:09 pm, George Hammond wrote:
The "God" of Man is simply a 100% fully grown man.
[Titus, serendipitous twit]
Is he a blond, brunette, red, or black hair? What race is he? Blue,
green, or brown eyes? Height? Weight? Double-jointed or no? I'm
assuming that he is ambidextrous and perfectly symmetrical.



[Hammond]
He's whaterver YOU are! The "god" of each individual is
a perfect fully grown version of YOU. However, since there
are 6 billion people all of the same species, and the
perceptual effect is the same for all of us, the general
phenomena is called "God" with a capitol "G".

You should make up your mind. Is there one god? or 12 (or
13 if the Greeks could not count)? Or are there billions,
one for each of us? I bet my god could beat up your god.


[Hammond]
Na, I was born an atheist, and remained an atheist up
until the time that I accidentally stumbled across the
scientific proof of God when I was 55 years of age in 1997.
I had no religious beliefs whatsoever. I was searching
for the Structural Model of Personality when I ACCIDENTALLY
discovered the SPOG, and suddenly realized that there WAS a
"God" and what it was, and what religion was actually
talking about behind all that metaphorical mumbo jumbo!

No, you just made more mumbo jumbo.

[Titus, serendipitous twit]
Wait. You were saying earlier how this discovery took 25 years of
research. 25 years of one man's research _part time_ is not 25 years
of research either.


[Hammond]
Wahddau mean "part time" asshole. People like me don't
"work" for chrissakes, we fight for a living 24 hours a
day... in my case doing full time independent research. Go
punch a time clock moron.


I forgot that you have not been able to get a job so you look
down on those who do productive work while you live on welfare.

snip horse****
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:00:01 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 16:27:23 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 9, 1:04 pm, madge wrote:
On May 9, 9:54 pm, George Hammond wrote:

[Hammond]
If Man did not exist, the Sun would not even rise
tomorrow morning. In fact w/o Man there would BE no
tomorrow!

A fascist male argument George.

If man did not exist the Sun would rise on us Wimmin.

If you die the universe doesn't exist anymore,

TeeHee.


[Hammond]
Only if you're the last man.


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Define 'man'.


[Hammond]
A member of the species Homo Sapiens sapiens,
offically abbreviated as (HSs).


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Given the process of evolution, in the distant past a thing called 'man'
did not exist. At some point, genetic mutations caused 'man' to descend
from an earlier form.


[Hammond]
Correct, HSs appeared approximately 200,000 years ago.
The Christian Bible calls this event "Creation"; in Genesis.
It is called Creation because that is when the World
(reality as know ) it commenced.



[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Please identify the gene or genes that provide this particular mammalian
entity with the power to 'observe' a universe into existence.


[Hammond]
The "Human Genome" (genome of HSs) has been fully mapped
and can unequivocally identifiy any member of our species.
The facxt that we are THE ONLY LIFEFORM which has a word,
a name, or even a CONCEPT OF "existence" or "reality" is de
facto evidence that "The mind of Man is the creator of what
we call reality"; BY DEFINITION!

Are you sure about that? Dolphins are self aware and may very well have
a concept of existence or reality comparable to our own.


--
Paul Hovnanian
------------------------------------------------------------------
Human beings were created by water to transport it uphill.

On Fri, 09 May 2008 17:37:21 GMT, Temporal Voyager George Hammond
, in a desperate attempt to change the sci.skeptic
timestream, said:

On Fri, 09 May 2008 16:19:22 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

Doesn't change the fact, either, that - as usual again - you bellow and
insult and run away ......... without addressing the point.

You're nothing more than a fraudulent pile of ****.

[Hammond]
Go back to your job parking cars and stop heckling
scientific discussions.

When you come up with one, be sure to let us know.


--
"One does wonder why God went to the trouble of making Man
rational, since there's evidently no bloody use for reason
whatsoever."
- Alan Hope, in a religious discussion in misc.writing

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:36:21 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

George Hammond writes:

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:14:08 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote:

Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million deities. How is India
doing, Georgie boy?

Idiot.

[Hammond]
The SPOG explains and PROVES why there are 30 demigods in
Hindii; because there are 30 first order eigenvectors in
Psychometric correlation matricess, worldwide .

Can't you read? Uncle Al wrote that Hinduism has 360 million deities,
not just 30.


[Hammond]
His statement is manifestly absurd, there aren't 360
million names in the Human Language.
On the other hand there ARE 30 eigenvectors in every
comprehensive Psychometric correlation matrix, so there
CERTAINLY ARE 30 "DEMIGODS" in Religion; scientifically
speaking. Stop trying to pretend you're not an aggravated
halfwit heckler.

If I recall correctly, your Psychometric correlation matrix maps out a
"personality space" (and IIRC, it actually isn't your psychometric matrix,
it is Cattell's). The eigenvectors represent orthogonal "directions" within
that space and each would capture some distinct aspects of personality.
Now, as far as gods are concerned: gods can be seen as personality
archetypes. Of course I agree that personality archetypes would necessarily
fit into your "personality space" but it is not at all clear to me that gods
correspond to eigenvectors. So please demonstrate with at least a few
examples how specific gods equate with a specific eigenvectors.

(It's your thesis. You prove it.)

Secondly:
IIRC, your eigenvectors have "levels" or "order". The first order is
lowest, and you proceed level by level up to the highest order, in which
there is a single eigenvector and that, you say, is God who is depicted on
the Sistine Chapel. Now, IIRC you place the Greek gods at a higher order
than Hindu gods. But the Greek gods are personality archetypes of normal
everyday flawed human beings and the Hindu gods (at least in Tibetan
Hinduism) the gods represent aspects of human being who have achieved
enlightenment. Therefore, the Greek gods should be eigenvectors of a lower
order (perhaps the first), and Hindu gods should be a higher order (perhaps
the second).