Ken wrote in news:d963ae94-6865-47ad-815f-
:

On May 10, 9:08*am, George Hammond wrote:


[Hammond]
* *Wimmin is minnow spelled backwards. *Whimin is the
correct spelling. *Go back to playing Bingo, I'm busy playing with mysel
f

& what is Dog spelled backwards, ya friggin CRACKPOT?

VU_G.

HTH, HAND.

John.

On May 10, 12:12*pm, Ken wrote:
On May 10, 9:08*am, George Hammond wrote:



[Hammond]
* *Wimmin is minnow spelled backwards. *Whimin is the
correct spelling. *Go back to playing Bingo, I'm busy playing with myself

& what is Dog spelled backwards, ya friggin CRACKPOT?

Shame on you to speak to the king of crackpots like he is an ordinary
crackpot...

Shame...

Mike

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Thanks for your response, George. I couldn't have done it without you.
Also, I want to thank my wonderful family for getting me here. And my
noble financiers, may they swim in delicious parfaits for eternity. I
especially enjoyed the part about Fight Club.


"This is your life, and it's ending one minute at a time."

George Hammond wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 16:27:23 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 9, 1:04 pm, madge wrote:
On May 9, 9:54 pm, George Hammond wrote:

[Hammond]
If Man did not exist, the Sun would not even rise
tomorrow morning. In fact w/o Man there would BE no
tomorrow!

A fascist male argument George.

If man did not exist the Sun would rise on us Wimmin.

If you die the universe doesn't exist anymore,

TeeHee.


[Hammond]
Only if you're the last man.

Define 'man'.

Given the process of evolution, in the distant past a thing called 'man'
did not exist. At some point, genetic mutations caused 'man' to descend
from an earlier form.

Please identify the gene or genes that provide this particular mammalian
entity with the power to 'observe' a universe into existence.

As evolution progresses, what we think of as 'man' will cease to exist.
It will be replaced by a (hopefully) more advanced being. At what point
in the future will the universe cease to exist?

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Procrastinators: The leaders for tomorrow.

On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:00:01 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 16:27:23 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 9, 1:04 pm, madge wrote:
On May 9, 9:54 pm, George Hammond wrote:

[Hammond]
If Man did not exist, the Sun would not even rise
tomorrow morning. In fact w/o Man there would BE no
tomorrow!

A fascist male argument George.

If man did not exist the Sun would rise on us Wimmin.

If you die the universe doesn't exist anymore,

TeeHee.


[Hammond]
Only if you're the last man.


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Define 'man'.


[Hammond]
A member of the species Homo Sapiens sapiens,
offically abbreviated as (HSs).


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Given the process of evolution, in the distant past a thing called 'man'
did not exist. At some point, genetic mutations caused 'man' to descend
from an earlier form.


[Hammond]
Correct, HSs appeared approximately 200,000 years ago.
The Christian Bible calls this event "Creation"; in Genesis.
It is called Creation because that is when the World
(reality as know ) it commenced.



[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
Please identify the gene or genes that provide this particular mammalian
entity with the power to 'observe' a universe into existence.


[Hammond]
The "Human Genome" (genome of HSs) has been fully mapped
and can unequivocally identifiy any member of our species.
The facxt that we are THE ONLY LIFEFORM which has a word,
a name, or even a CONCEPT OF "existence" or "reality" is de
facto evidence that "The mind of Man is the creator of what
we call reality"; BY DEFINITION!


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
As evolution progresses, what we think of as 'man' will cease to exist.


[Hammond]
If and when that happens, "reality as we know it will
perish with us".


[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
It will be replaced by a (hopefully) more advanced being.


[Hammond]
That is certainly irrelevant to us since we will be long
dead. No "competing" species can ever evolve out of the
species HSs because geographical separation is no longer
possible.



[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]
At what point in the future will the universe cease to exist?


[Hammond]
Judging from the Secular Trend Curve, Man will achieve
FULL BODILY GROWTH within "thousands" of years, a few
hundred thousand years at a MAXIMUM, and probably much, much
sooner. At that point we are all de facto in possession of
ETERNAL LIFE, so extinction, from any cause is IRRELEVANT
after that; the advent of Kingdom Come so called.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On May 10, 3:51*pm, George Hammond wrote:

At that point we are all de facto in possession of
ETERNAL LIFE, so extinction, from any cause is IRRELEVANT
after that; the advent of Kingdom Come so called.


You are SUCH a CRACKPOT!

On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:53:23 -0700 (PDT), Mike
wrote:

On May 10, 12:12*pm, Ken wrote:
On May 10, 9:08*am, George Hammond wrote:



[Hammond]
* *Wimmin is minnow spelled backwards. *Whimin is the
correct spelling. *Go back to playing Bingo, I'm busy playing with myself

& what is Dog spelled backwards, ya friggin CRACKPOT?

Shame on you to speak to the king of crackpots like he is an ordinary
crackpot...

Shame...

Mike


[Hammond]
The Pied Piper of crackpots, including you.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Ken
wrote:

On May 10, 9:08*am, George Hammond wrote:


[Hammond]
* *Wimmin is minnow spelled backwards. *Whimin is the
correct spelling. *Go back to playing Bingo, I'm busy [snip forged message].


[Hammond]
Don't frig with the subject header crackpot.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On May 11, 12:33*am, George Hammond wrote:
]
[Hammond]
* *Don't frig with the subject header crackpot.


Watz da matter, CRACKPOT?
If you don't like being called one, then stop being one, YA CRACKPOT

The universal characteristics of crackpots include:
Crackpots overestimate their own knowledge and ability, and
underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
Crackpots insist that their alleged discoveries are urgently
important.

George Hammond wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2008 05:53:49 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:23:00 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

[Hammond]
IQ in adults is directly
proportioanal to PFF since both are simply a measure of
mental speed in bits/sec.
[Doug, PhD heckler]
So blind people are dumb? You cannot measure their fusion
rate and, since they have not been trained, it would not
be good. Or are you just saying they are more religious?



[Hammond]
This is an example of why you are a fraudulent science
PhD claimant.
PFF is only ONE WAY to measure "mental speed" in humans,
which is known to be, btw, 16 bits/sec in normal average
adults. this happens to explain why early movies were shot
at 16 frames/second but is true irregardless of wether you
are blind or not as any COMPETENT high school graduate would
know.
You're an incompetent moron, but beyond that you're an
aggravated psychotic heckler which makes it a sheer delight
to bootf''''k you all over Usenet.

[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
So George has a theory that goes like this.

1. Different people are able to see motion at different rates.
Things will blur at different rates for different people.


[Hammond]
Crudely correct statement. Congratulations dimwit

[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
2. Therefore this proves there is a god.


[Hammond]
Again correct statement. However you have left out the
evidence that proves WHY this effect proves "God",
apparently because you are too incompetent and disinterested
to actually read the theory, and because of the vast lacunae
in your general education.

There was no proof to leave out. You just leaped to that
conclusion because you wanted to get to that conclusion
independent of the facts. That is not how science is done.



[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
These two statements are not connected in any way.


[Hammond]
UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION
due to the fact that the heckler has not actually READ the
theory or is simply UNABLE to understand it because of
educational ignorance.

[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
He is just assuming that if something is blurry or unseen, it must be
his god.


[Hammond]
BLATANT LIE.
In fact the published theory shows that ALL 20 CLAIMED
PHENOMENA of Religion are proven and explained by this and
other physics structure of the theory... all of which are
simply IGNORED by the heckler. The central achievement of
the SPOG is in fact to PROVE that this invisibility CAUSES
the phenomena of God.

This statement totally ignores the facts. You have made this
wild speculation and just assumed you were right. Your spog
just shows that you have no connection with reality.



One simply has to be aware that this poster is HIGHLY
IGNORANT, HIGHLY AGGRAVATED, AND HIGHLY INCOMPETENT.
AND IS A TYPICAL "PSYCHOTIC HECKLER".

So pointing out your mistakes is not appreciated by you?
If you want to be a scientist, you should welcome this.
But, then again, you are not a scientist.


[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
His "theory" predicts that high speed cameras and all flash
cameras are capable of seeing his god since they can stop
motion at higher rates than a person can see. The cameras
do not so there is no evidence for his "theory".



[Hammond]
This CANARD has been discussed a million times by Hammond
and thoroughly debunked.
"SLO-MO" and ZOOM LENS will not and CAN NOT reproduce the
effect on reality seen by a person with changed mental
speed. The fundamental reason for this is that our
identification of OTHER PEOPLE'S IDENTITY is based on our
own mental speed and our estimate (identification) of
others' mental speed (identity recognition). This means
that if your mental speed were to change then everybody
ELSE'S identity would suddenly change also. OTOH, filming a
person and then slo-mo-ing the film only makes it look like
the SAME PERSON is "moving slowly"...... there is a WORLD OF
DIFFERENCE between these two situations!

This is a really impressive word salad of meaningless assumptions
and unrelated speculation.


If it weren't for this crucial difference we would not
need artists like Rembrandt, or Da Vinci to paint the visual
phenomenon of God using their own "variable and
controllable" mental speed and we could simply replace them
with photographic cameras..... which is a WELL KNOWN AMATEUR
ERROR based on stultifying common IGNORANCE. The Mona Lisa
is worth $50,000,000

As far as I know, the Mona Lisa is not god. Or do you have
another one in mind of the either one, 12 (or 13) or billions
that you have claimed at different times?

and the Sistine Chapel Ceiling is worth
a billion dollars... there is no "photograph" that is worth
50 million dollars and never will be! and for the SAME
REASON Hammond and Hammond's discovery of the SPOG is worth
another billion dollars! Stupid!

How much has it earned you so far?


[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
This is why it shows up in only the vanity press and Usenet.


[Hammond]
LIAR...LOL LOL LOL LIAR LOL LOL LOL
LIAR...LOL LOL LOL LIAR LOL LOL LOL
_New ideas In Psychology_ (Pergamon Press) is a
prestigious, thoroughly peer reviewed, premier academic
publication.
QUIT YOUR LYING HECKLER

It is still a vanity press. You do not like that fact but
that is the way it is.



and the Noetic Journal is also a peer reviewed Journal with
25 Professorial ranking members on it's editorial board.
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO IS A FAUD AND A LIAR
AND AN ANONYMOUS PSYCHOTIC HECKLER

[Doug, incompetent scientist and heckler]
If it were a real theory, it would show up in science.


[Hammond]
It already has, it's called the ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE and
has been front page news in Physics for 25 years. You're
an irresponsible scientifically incompetent anonymous
heckling retarded hyena and stooge.

You have taken your own perverted interpretation of the
work of competent people. That does not mean that your
misunderstanding was what they said.


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================