John Smith wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:



[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.



[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:

150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.

100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.

80 years of General Relativity research.

50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.

110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.

80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.

40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.

20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.

The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.

ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.

I will have to say that that is the same kind of reasoning you
use in your "proof". So if Einstein was right, you must be right
also.

You plotted a graph with two lines that did not follow each
other and then you said that was a proof of god. There is no
connection between your graphs and any god much less any proof
of any god.




Claiming ancient works support your crap MEANS NOTHING - since those people
are not around to deny your warped claims!
THAT'S why YOU have to do the experiments AS THEY APPLY TO YOUR CLAIMS.
(You've already been shown wrong several times in your distortions of the
meaning of other people's work.).
You can't.
You haven't.
You won't.

You'll just keep on bellowing the same UNSUPPORTED CRAP!

John Smith wrote:
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 04 May 2008 10:46:52 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


SNIP

[John Smith, atheist, raving S.P.O.G. critic]
You have no idea what I have and have not read.
Your previous behavior and posts indicate one hell of a lot of distorting
other peoples writings to fit your own insane claims ...
and they have constantly been pointed out to you.
As is your habit - you just ignored that too!

[JOHN SMITH, HECKLER]
UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION

If you already knew your assertion was unsupported - why did you bother
posting it?

Note that, once again, you ignore the points of the conversation and resort
to childish name calling.


What else can he do? He is wrong. He knows he is wrong so all he has
left is to try to bully everyone. It has not worked with anyone so
far in 14 years (he claims to have done this in 1994) and it will not
work in 1400 years.

He is good for some entertainment as we can cycle around the various
cranks. There is always a good supply of people who think that the
rules of science and logic do not apply to them.

George may also just be lonely and desperate to have anyone to talk to.
There are others that way here. Lester Zick says a lot of stupid
things just so people will reply and then he can insult them and
make claims that are about as silly as George's. Androcles is just
looking for anyone to insult but he gets mostly ignored as he is
not entertaining.

On Sun, 4 May 2008 20:31:25 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:


[Hammmond]
it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!

[Michael Moroney]
George, either you are extremely forgetful or are just trolling. You
didn't mention Einstein's famous eclipse experiment.


[Hammond]
Einstein's friend who was supposed to do the experiment
got arrested in Russia due to the war and was lucky to
escape. The eclipse experiment wasn't executed until 1921
by Eddington, 6 years AFTER Einstein's theory was published
and widely known and accepted, eddington's experiment was
just the frosting on the cake.



[snip]

I see no experiments suggested by yourself. I repeat: So what
experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done that will
verify or refute your hypothesis?



[Hammond]
Dalton didn't need to suggest any experimentas, and
neither do I. His theory was confirmed by thousands of
published experiments, and so is the S.P.O.G.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:


Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
Unfortunately, I suspected as much. This is not something that
you'd expect from a judge handling a minor traffic ticket case.


[Hammond]
2 months later I gave a specially invited talk to 200
research psychologists at the XXVI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF
PSYCHOLOGY in Montreal Canada on August 18, 1996. I sat on
the dais for 2 hours with Prof. Hans Eysenck himself (then
the world's most famous living psychologist) and we
discussed my discovery of the Structural Model of
Personality. I received a robust ovation from the audience
and many personal complements..... obviously they don't
think I'm crazy!

The ability of psychologists to think is not very good. One
day when I went to my office in the physics building, there
were about 50 students standing in the hall. I opened my office
and they started to follow me in. I asked what they were doing
and they said there was a class scheduled there. I told them
that this was my office but they insisted and showed me the
schedule of classes. The class was a psychology class listed
to be in PSY1405. They all thought that PSY was psyics. None
of them could figure that out.

By the way, the story of the "minor traffic ticket" is not
believable any more than your proof. Sanity hearing perhaps
but not a traffic ticket.


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:52:44 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:


[Doug, HECKLER]
Since everyone who has posted here sees it is wrong, it is a
well backed assertion.


[Hammond]
The opinion of Internet crackposts like you is irrelevant
except for publicity purposes.

So those who point out your mistakes are crackpots. You have
an odd idea of what the scientific method is. You draw two
lines on a graph and declare that proves a god of some sort
exists or something. There is no connection between the
graph and your claim. You do not like that pointed out.
If you believed your claim, you would defend it. You cannot
so you try to attack those who point out your mistakes.


SNIP RANT

[Hammond]
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.

You failed graduate school and I did not. That bothers
you but that is the truth. Get over it.

It is interesting though that it is clear you have not
had your career in any senior roles as you jumped quite
a bit when you found out I have a PhD. You also did not
like that as you want to try to attack it. No luck on
that front as my degree is not subject to your approval.
That and the other facts of physics exist independent of
what you claim.

Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
You have not posted a single competent scientific
comment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.

I could have seen through your "proof" even after junior
high school so my PhD is certainly not necessary for that.

Again, if I post my CV are you then going to believe
and apologize for wasting everyone's time or are you just
going to continue blustering, swearing, threatening and
using lots of capital letters.

Get off this thread.

Show me the proof that you control the internet.


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2008 20:31:25 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:


[Hammmond]
it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
[Michael Moroney]
George, either you are extremely forgetful or are just trolling. You
didn't mention Einstein's famous eclipse experiment.


[Hammond]
Einstein's friend who was supposed to do the experiment
got arrested in Russia due to the war and was lucky to
escape. The eclipse experiment wasn't executed until 1921
by Eddington, 6 years AFTER Einstein's theory was published
and widely known and accepted, eddington's experiment was
just the frosting on the cake.


[snip]

I see no experiments suggested by yourself. I repeat: So what
experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done that will
verify or refute your hypothesis?



[Hammond]
Dalton didn't need to suggest any experimentas, and
neither do I. His theory was confirmed by thousands of
published experiments, and so is the S.P.O.G.

Show one experiment that show that two plotted lines that
do not intersect are a proof of a god.

=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 22:11:38 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


"George Hammond" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:




[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.



[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:

150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.

100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.

80 years of General Relativity research.

50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.

110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.

80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.

40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.

20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.

The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.

ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.


[John Smith]
Claiming ancient works support your crap MEANS NOTHING - since those people
are not around to deny your warped claims!


[Hammond]
Baloney, Leverrier's measurement of the Perihelion of
Mercury was the ONLY experimental support for Einstein when
he published GR, and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time.


[Hammond]
Besides, the bulk of the research which supports the SPOG
dates from AFTER the invention of the electronic computer
(post 1970). TENS OF THOUSANDS of Factor Analytic
experiments on MILLIONS of people using MAINFRAME
EIGENVECTOR EXTRACTION from 100x100 matrices, or large,
confirm overwhelmingly that Hammond's SPOG is correct, and
that God is a CURVATURE of reality caused by the Secular
Trend Growth Deficit.
Historic research from other fields LIKEWISE confirm it,
notably the PFF (Picture Fusion Frequency) measurements, and
notably the entire history of IQ testing.
Cartesian (orthogonal) Stem Cell cleavage in Embryology is
also well known and a foundation stone of the proof.
Sperry's historic L-R brain discovery is also a major
buttress of the theory as are THOUSANDS of other researches
in diverse fields, all cited in my paper.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 04 May 2008 22:11:38 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:



[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.



[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:

150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.

100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.

80 years of General Relativity research.

50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.

110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.

80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.

40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.

20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.

The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.

ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.

[John Smith]
Claiming ancient works support your crap MEANS NOTHING - since those people
are not around to deny your warped claims!


[Hammond]
Baloney, Leverrier's measurement of the Perihelion of
Mercury was the ONLY experimental support for Einstein when
he published GR, and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time.

[Hammond]
Besides, the bulk of the research which supports the SPOG
dates from AFTER the invention of the electronic computer
(post 1970). TENS OF THOUSANDS of Factor Analytic
experiments on MILLIONS of people using MAINFRAME
EIGENVECTOR EXTRACTION from 100x100 matrices, or large,
confirm overwhelmingly that Hammond's SPOG is correct, and
that God is a CURVATURE of reality caused by the Secular
Trend Growth Deficit.

Support this assertion. They have nothing to do with your
"proof".

Historic research from other fields LIKEWISE confirm it,
notably the PFF (Picture Fusion Frequency) measurements, and
notably the entire history of IQ testing.

This is the silliest thing you have said. There is no connection
and you have not even tried to show one.

Cartesian (orthogonal) Stem Cell cleavage in Embryology is
also well known and a foundation stone of the proof.
Sperry's historic L-R brain discovery is also a major
buttress of the theory as are THOUSANDS of other researches
in diverse fields, all cited in my paper.

So L-R means god?


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 4 May 2008 23:57:12 +0000 (UTC), Jeff?Relf
wrote:


[Jeff Relf, C.S.I. lead investigator]
Unlike George Hammond's daydreams, General Relativity
and the second law of thermodynamics are falsifiable.


[Hammond]
Of course the S.P.O.G. is "falsifiable". Because it is
an "experimentally verified" theory, therefore if any of the
myriad verifying experiments had failed, which none did, it
would be "falsified". Your missed Jeff.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond writes:

Besides, the bulk of the research which supports the SPOG
dates from AFTER the invention of the electronic computer
(post 1970). TENS OF THOUSANDS of Factor Analytic
experiments on MILLIONS of people using MAINFRAME
EIGENVECTOR EXTRACTION from 100x100 matrices, or large,
confirm overwhelmingly that Hammond's SPOG is correct, and
that God is a CURVATURE of reality caused by the Secular
Trend Growth Deficit.
Historic research from other fields LIKEWISE confirm it,
notably the PFF (Picture Fusion Frequency) measurements, and
notably the entire history of IQ testing.
Cartesian (orthogonal) Stem Cell cleavage in Embryology is
also well known and a foundation stone of the proof.
Sperry's historic L-R brain discovery is also a major
buttress of the theory as are THOUSANDS of other researches
in diverse fields, all cited in my paper.

Holy word salad, Batman!