On Sun, 04 May 2008 10:46:52 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:



SNIP

[John Smith, atheist, raving S.P.O.G. critic]
You have no idea what I have and have not read.
Your previous behavior and posts indicate one hell of a lot of distorting
other peoples writings to fit your own insane claims ...
and they have constantly been pointed out to you.
As is your habit - you just ignored that too!

[JOHN SMITH, HECKLER]
UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:57:23 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:



SNIP RANT


[Hammond]
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.
Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
You have not posted a single competent scientific
somment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.
Get off this thread.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 10:38:42 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


[Hammond]
I tried to tell them I wasn't crazy, that I was a
scientist and actually had discovered the world's first
scientific proof of God... but the more I told them the less
they believed me and kept telling me to take the welfare
check and go to McDonald's and get something to eat. Finally
I just said o.k.


[JOHN SMITH, HECKLER]
Here's a hint ... the more you talked to them, the more insane they
thought
you were.
You probably won't get it anyway.


[Hammond]
2 months later I gave a specially invited talk to 200
research psychologists at the XXVI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF
PSYCHOLOGY in Montreal Canada on August 18, 1996. I sat on
the dais for 2 hours with Prof. Hans Eysenck himself (then
the world's most famous living psychologist) and we
discussed my discovery of the Structural Model of
Personality. I received a robust ovation from the audience
and many personal complements..... obviously they don't
think I'm crazy!

Hey ......... that's the same day I saw Elvis.
What a coincidence!


[Hammond]
Why is that a cooincidence, ape****?
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:57:23 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:


SNIP RANT

[Hammond]
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.
Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
You have not posted a single competent scientific
somment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.
Get off this thread.

So you are afraid to answer the question. I thought so.


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:


Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
Unfortunately, I suspected as much. This is not something that
you'd expect from a judge handling a minor traffic ticket case.


[Hammond]
2 months later I gave a specially invited talk to 200
research psychologists at the XXVI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF
PSYCHOLOGY in Montreal Canada on August 18, 1996. I sat on
the dais for 2 hours with Prof. Hans Eysenck himself (then
the world's most famous living psychologist) and we
discussed my discovery of the Structural Model of
Personality. I received a robust ovation from the audience
and many personal complements..... obviously they don't
think I'm crazy!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:51:59 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:




SNIP RANT


[Hammond]
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.
Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
You have not posted a single competent scientific
comment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.
Get off this thread.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:52:44 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:


[Doug, HECKLER]
Since everyone who has posted here sees it is wrong, it is a
well backed assertion.


[Hammond]
The opinion of Internet crackposts like you is irrelevant
except for publicity purposes.



SNIP RANT


[Hammond]
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.
Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
You have not posted a single competent scientific
comment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.
Get off this thread.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond writes:

On Sun, 4 May 2008 15:51:53 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:

This makes George's claims of science publication bypassing the scientific
method 0 for 7. That right, George. Zero cases. You got it wrong each
time.

Therefore, the
S.P.O.G. is not the first "purely theoretical discovery
based on existing data" in scientific history.

That's right, simply because it's definitely not any sort of "discovery"

Dirac never did any experiments,
and neither did I, I simply "theoretically explained the
existing phenomenon of God"

Here we have your admission of not following the scientific method. You
did no experiments.

Neither did Einstein, moron.

What about the solar eclipse/star position I've mentioned a half dozen
times? What about the photoelectric effect?

Or is your claim that other people did the eclipse observation instead of
Einstein himself or something? Remember, what is necessary is the
scientist _proposes_ the experiment that will verify or refute the
hypothesis. Others can do the experiment in collaboration with the
scientists, if he give them proper credit. Einstein's proposed experiment
was quite clear: If he was correct, you'll see a star _here_.

OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.

On Sun, 4 May 2008 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:




[Michael Moroney, HECKLER]
OK, so what experiment(s) have you _proposed_ that you or others have done
that will verify or refute your hypothesis? Remember, ones done before
creation of the hypothesis count toward the creation of the hypothesis,
not the verification of it.



[Hammond]
Look asshole, it is a well known historical fact that
Einstein's theory of General Relativity had only ONE
experimental confirmation when he published it and that was
Leverrier's measurement of the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury and that was 100 YEARS OLD at the time!
The SPOG is confirmed by:

150 years of Biology research in embryology by Roux,
Conklin, Speman, Dreisch and others.

100- years of neuropsychology research by Bell-Magendie,
Sperry, McClain and others.

80 years of General Relativity research.

50 years of computer research extraction of eignvector
models Psychometry including the Eysenck-3, AVA-4, Big-5,
Brand-6, Cattell-7, Saucier-8, Cattel-13 and many others...
in fact EVERY published psychometric model in the
literature.

110 years of measurement of the Picture Fusion Frequency
(PFF) since the time of Thomas Edison and recently by Lehrl
and Fischer.

80 years of research on the Secular Trend in human growth by
the WHOI, Unicef, Red Cross and hundreds of academic
studies.

40 years of modern measurements of IQ vis. Mental Speed.

20 years of research on the Anthropic Principle in Physics.

The list goes on, and is all cited in my published papers.

ALL THIS EVIDENCE is EQUIVALENT to Leverrier's Perihelion
measurement in GR. Einstein was right about GR, and Hammond
is right about the SPOG.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 09:37:25 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:



SNIP RANT


[Hammond]
You have not posted a single competent scientific
comment to this thread, merely off topic inane
heckling.
Get off this thread.
You claim to be a physicist but have no CV,
real name, or verification.
Your totally non-scientific postings show you are
a crackpot with possibly a charity degree in applied
Science at best.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================