![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: anthropic, god, principle, relativistic |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just more illogical nonsense!
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:28:30 GMT, George Hammond wrote: GOD = RAP (Relativistic Anthropic Principle) The Anthropic Principle is well known to Science today. Carter, Barrow, Tipler, Wheeler and even Hawking and Penrose and Weinberg have written extensively on the subject. What Science DOESN'T KNOW is that the Anthropic Principle was actually discovered thousands of years ago by Religion. The irony of this has not been lost on Religious experts. Fact is, the "Anthropic Principle" simply says: "observables exist because observers exist". After all, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if there was no such thing as an observer, then there would be no such thing as observables; since the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist. As far as Physics is concerned of course, "Man" is THE observer. This proves that it is MAN who causes the Universe to exist. After all, if all people died at 9am tomorrow, there would no longer be any observables, no universe, no time, no space; no nothing. NOTHING WOULD "EXIST". Religion recognized this principle thousands of years ago, St. Augustine in particular. In fact Bishop George Berkeley formally published the thesis 300 years ago, and as recently as 1900 Mary Baker Eddy founded the highly successful Christian Science Church on the principle. It is therefore a fascinating irony that Science has finally stumbled on the PRACTICAL DISCOVERY of the Anthropic Principle... they finally recognized such elementary facts as WHY the Universe is 13 billion years old... i.e. that it took that long for Man to emerge, and without Man there is no "Universe"... therefore, the Anthropic Principle not only explains the "age of the Universe"... but that realization actually proves that the AP explains the existence of the Universe in the first place! OK... but the scientists have YET to realize this; that the existence itself, of anything, depends on the Anthropic Principle... and therefore, that the Anthropic Principle de facto explains the so called "Biblical Creation"... existence itself only came into being 200,000 years ago when Man appeared; Homo Sapiens sapiens. Note that the Bible figures this was 6,000 years ago, but Anthropology was in a primitive state when the Bible was written, so they're about 194,000 short of the correct date of Creation... but still a good guess for nonscientific people in primitive times. OK.... here's the REAL ENTERTAINMENT aspect of all this. Religious people are far smarter and more widely educated than Scientists (believe it or not), and consequently they view the Scientific "discovery" of the Anthropic Principle with MUCH AMUSEMENT, since they have known about it for thousands of years. The Religious people of course realize that "Man created reality" and they further realize that Scientists think that "Reality created Man". Knowing that it is futile to try and explain this to stubborn and nerd like Scientists, the Religious people are having a field day teasing the Physicists with long endless dissertations on how "scientifically peculiar" it is that the Universe seems to be so "finely tuned" to support life (when of course just the opposite is true as any dunderhead can see... that in fact "life is finely tuned to fit into the universe by Natural Selection). And sure enough, the scientists fall for it every time, why we have scientists pointing out that "if the electron was 1% smaller, life couldn't exist", or "if the Earths orbit was 1% larger, we would be extinct", or "if there wasn't an excited state of Carbon at 6.67 Mev carbon based life couldn't exist", blah, blah, blah. However, it turns out that HAMMOND (2003) is slated to have the last laugh, a laugh at BOTH the scientists and the Theologians! HAMMOND of course long ago recognized that "the mind creates Reality, and therefore the Universe and everything in it.... but AMAZINGLY....Hammond also being a prodigious Relativity physicist psychology investigator (Psychometrics), accidentally discovered that human perception (of reality) is actually RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. In other words, the reality you see, is actually a CURVED VERSION of true reality, and that this makes part of true reality INVISBLE to you, me, and every other person in the human race. And this phenomena is known historically as "GOD". Yes... HAMMOND has discovered (and proved and peer published, 2003) that the universal Secular Trend Growth Deficit in Man, causes Man's perception (of sight, sound, touch, taste, smell) to be RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED thus rendering 20%, on average, of (normal) Reality to be invisible... thus scientifically explaining and proving the existence of God and Heaven in one fell swoop. Meanwhile the entertaining dialog between Physics and Religion over the so called "Anthropic Principle" continues to highly amuse those people in society who already full well know what God actually is, and I predict, that there will be much gnashing of teeth among the academic pedants when HAMMOND'S discovery of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof of God (SPOG for short) becomes common scientific knowlege. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
GOD = RAP
(Relativistic Anthropic Principle) The Anthropic Principle is well known to Science today. Carter, Barrow, Tipler, Wheeler and even Hawking and Penrose and Weinberg have written extensively on the subject. What Science DOESN'T KNOW is that the Anthropic Principle was actually discovered thousands of years ago by Religion. The irony of this has not been lost on Religious experts. Fact is, the "Anthropic Principle" simply says: "observables exist because observers exist". After all, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if there was no such thing as an observer, then there would be no such thing as observables; since the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist. As far as Physics is concerned of course, "Man" is THE observer. This proves that it is MAN who causes the Universe to exist. After all, if all people died at 9am tomorrow, there would no longer be any observables, no universe, no time, no space; no nothing. NOTHING WOULD "EXIST". Religion recognized this principle thousands of years ago, St. Augustine in particular. In fact Bishop George Berkeley formally published the thesis 300 years ago, and as recently as 1900 Mary Baker Eddy founded the highly successful Christian Science Church on the principle. It is therefore a fascinating irony that Science has finally stumbled on the PRACTICAL DISCOVERY of the Anthropic Principle... they finally recognized such elementary facts as WHY the Universe is 13 billion years old... i.e. that it took that long for Man to emerge, and without Man there is no "Universe"... therefore, the Anthropic Principle not only explains the "age of the Universe"... but that realization actually proves that the AP explains the existence of the Universe in the first place! OK... but the scientists have YET to realize this; that the existence itself, of anything, depends on the Anthropic Principle... and therefore, that the Anthropic Principle de facto explains the so called "Biblical Creation"... existence itself only came into being 200,000 years ago when Man appeared; Homo Sapiens sapiens. Note that the Bible figures this was 6,000 years ago, but Anthropology was in a primitive state when the Bible was written, so they're about 194,000 short of the correct date of Creation... but still a good guess for nonscientific people in primitive times. OK.... here's the REAL ENTERTAINMENT aspect of all this. Religious people are far smarter and more widely educated than Scientists (believe it or not), and consequently they view the Scientific "discovery" of the Anthropic Principle with MUCH AMUSEMENT, since they have known about it for thousands of years. The Religious people of course realize that "Man created reality" and they further realize that Scientists think that "Reality created Man". Knowing that it is futile to try and explain this to stubborn and nerd like Scientists, the Religious people are having a field day teasing the Physicists with long endless dissertations on how "scientifically peculiar" it is that the Universe seems to be so "finely tuned" to support life (when of course just the opposite is true as any dunderhead can see... that in fact "life is finely tuned to fit into the universe by Natural Selection). And sure enough, the scientists fall for it every time, why we have scientists pointing out that "if the electron was 1% smaller, life couldn't exist", or "if the Earths orbit was 1% larger, we would be extinct", or "if there wasn't an excited state of Carbon at 6.67 Mev carbon based life couldn't exist", blah, blah, blah. However, it turns out that HAMMOND (2003) is slated to have the last laugh, a laugh at BOTH the scientists and the Theologians! HAMMOND of course long ago recognized that "the mind creates Reality, and therefore the Universe and everything in it.... but AMAZINGLY....Hammond also being a prodigious Relativity physicist psychology investigator (Psychometrics), accidentally discovered that human perception (of reality) is actually RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. In other words, the reality you see, is actually a CURVED VERSION of true reality, and that this makes part of true reality INVISBLE to you, me, and every other person in the human race. And this phenomena is known historically as "GOD". Yes... HAMMOND has discovered (and proved and peer published, 2003) that the universal Secular Trend Growth Deficit in Man, causes Man's perception (of sight, sound, touch, taste, smell) to be RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED thus rendering 20%, on average, of (normal) Reality to be invisible... thus scientifically explaining and proving the existence of God and Heaven in one fell swoop. Meanwhile the entertaining dialog between Physics and Religion over the so called "Anthropic Principle" continues to highly amuse those people in society who already full well know what God actually is, and I predict, that there will be much gnashing of teeth among the academic pedants when HAMMOND'S discovery of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof of God (SPOG for short) becomes common scientific knowlege. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
You cant see the forest for the trees.
You are looking at humanity through an electron microscope. The only goal of any religion is to control all humanity on the Earth and if possible the Entire Universe. Science is an evolutionary step above Religion but has been dominated by religion for religious ends. Maybe one day Raw Science will recognize the HUMAN as being a sacred animal then we can eliminate religion all together and together we can understand the universe in a nice and comfortable way. Religion is ancient forms of Government that originated prior to the Scientific Methodology. We alive today are doomed to suffer because it will not die easily. It seeks control by overpopulation as well as force and deception. It ( the religious ) used to use poison to murder non-religious persons until the 1800s when forensic science came along and could hold such people accountable. The crime of poisioning was punished in Roman times by feeding the offender to the wild beast. Religion is a sort of weapon of mass destruction invented by ancient philosophers. There have been einsteins all through history. But no weapon guilty of taking so many lives prematurely as Religion. This weapon was detonated maybe 2000 years ago and its echos are still here today and quite some time into the future. Religion is little more than a Computer Like virus infecting the human mind and transferred to the humans with child like minds from one generation to the next. At the time only some persons without religious contact during the first stage of their lives are immune to being infected. Whether you call it Christian, Moslum or Jew or Witch or Hari Khrishna or Scientology or Mental Health. it is all the same thing to me. Dark Star 1970s [ Bomb # 21 ] "George Hammond" wrote in message ... GOD = RAP (Relativistic Anthropic Principle) The Anthropic Principle is well known to Science today. Carter, Barrow, Tipler, Wheeler and even Hawking and Penrose and Weinberg have written extensively on the subject. What Science DOESN'T KNOW is that the Anthropic Principle was actually discovered thousands of years ago by Religion. The irony of this has not been lost on Religious experts. Fact is, the "Anthropic Principle" simply says: "observables exist because observers exist". After all, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if there was no such thing as an observer, then there would be no such thing as observables; since the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist. As far as Physics is concerned of course, "Man" is THE observer. This proves that it is MAN who causes the Universe to exist. After all, if all people died at 9am tomorrow, there would no longer be any observables, no universe, no time, no space; no nothing. NOTHING WOULD "EXIST". Religion recognized this principle thousands of years ago, St. Augustine in particular. In fact Bishop George Berkeley formally published the thesis 300 years ago, and as recently as 1900 Mary Baker Eddy founded the highly successful Christian Science Church on the principle. It is therefore a fascinating irony that Science has finally stumbled on the PRACTICAL DISCOVERY of the Anthropic Principle... they finally recognized such elementary facts as WHY the Universe is 13 billion years old... i.e. that it took that long for Man to emerge, and without Man there is no "Universe"... therefore, the Anthropic Principle not only explains the "age of the Universe"... but that realization actually proves that the AP explains the existence of the Universe in the first place! OK... but the scientists have YET to realize this; that the existence itself, of anything, depends on the Anthropic Principle... and therefore, that the Anthropic Principle de facto explains the so called "Biblical Creation"... existence itself only came into being 200,000 years ago when Man appeared; Homo Sapiens sapiens. Note that the Bible figures this was 6,000 years ago, but Anthropology was in a primitive state when the Bible was written, so they're about 194,000 short of the correct date of Creation... but still a good guess for nonscientific people in primitive times. OK.... here's the REAL ENTERTAINMENT aspect of all this. Religious people are far smarter and more widely educated than Scientists (believe it or not), and consequently they view the Scientific "discovery" of the Anthropic Principle with MUCH AMUSEMENT, since they have known about it for thousands of years. The Religious people of course realize that "Man created reality" and they further realize that Scientists think that "Reality created Man". Knowing that it is futile to try and explain this to stubborn and nerd like Scientists, the Religious people are having a field day teasing the Physicists with long endless dissertations on how "scientifically peculiar" it is that the Universe seems to be so "finely tuned" to support life (when of course just the opposite is true as any dunderhead can see... that in fact "life is finely tuned to fit into the universe by Natural Selection). And sure enough, the scientists fall for it every time, why we have scientists pointing out that "if the electron was 1% smaller, life couldn't exist", or "if the Earths orbit was 1% larger, we would be extinct", or "if there wasn't an excited state of Carbon at 6.67 Mev carbon based life couldn't exist", blah, blah, blah. However, it turns out that HAMMOND (2003) is slated to have the last laugh, a laugh at BOTH the scientists and the Theologians! HAMMOND of course long ago recognized that "the mind creates Reality, and therefore the Universe and everything in it.... but AMAZINGLY....Hammond also being a prodigious Relativity physicist psychology investigator (Psychometrics), accidentally discovered that human perception (of reality) is actually RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. In other words, the reality you see, is actually a CURVED VERSION of true reality, and that this makes part of true reality INVISBLE to you, me, and every other person in the human race. And this phenomena is known historically as "GOD". Yes... HAMMOND has discovered (and proved and peer published, 2003) that the universal Secular Trend Growth Deficit in Man, causes Man's perception (of sight, sound, touch, taste, smell) to be RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED thus rendering 20%, on average, of (normal) Reality to be invisible... thus scientifically explaining and proving the existence of God and Heaven in one fell swoop. Meanwhile the entertaining dialog between Physics and Religion over the so called "Anthropic Principle" continues to highly amuse those people in society who already full well know what God actually is, and I predict, that there will be much gnashing of teeth among the academic pedants when HAMMOND'S discovery of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof of God (SPOG for short) becomes common scientific knowlege. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 20, 4:55*pm, "ShivverMeTimbers"
wrote: You cant see the forest for the trees. You are looking at humanity through an electron microscope. The only goal of any religion is to control all humanity on the Earth and if possible the Entire Universe. Science is an evolutionary step above Religion but has been dominated by religion for religious ends. Maybe one day Raw Science will recognize the HUMAN as being a sacred animal then we can eliminate religion all together and together we can understand the universe in a nice and comfortable way. Religion is ancient forms of Government that originated prior to the Scientific Methodology. We alive today are doomed to suffer because it will not die easily. It seeks control by overpopulation as well as force and deception. It ( the religious ) used to use poison to murder non-religious persons until the 1800s when forensic science came along and could hold such people accountable. The crime of poisioning was punished in Roman times by feeding the offender to the wild beast. Religion is a sort of weapon of mass destruction invented by ancient philosophers. There have been einsteins all through history. But no weapon guilty of taking so many lives prematurely as Religion. This weapon was detonated maybe 2000 years ago and its echos are still here today and quite some time into the future. Religion is little more than a Computer Like virus infecting the human mind and transferred to the humans with child like minds from one generation to the next. At the time only some persons without religious contact during the first stage of their lives are immune to being infected. Whether you call it Christian, Moslum or Jew or Witch or Hari Khrishna or Scientology or Mental Health. it is all the same thing to me. Dark Star 1970s [ Bomb # 21 ] In China and India no clear distinction is made between literature, science, philosophy and literature. They are all ways of representing and understanding reality. The emphasis might differ a bit -- more introspection in one, perhaps, more observation in another -- but, essentially, they are using similar methods to achieve similar goals. In the West, they are often intimately related as well -- the modern scientific method is derived from the activities of analytical theologians such as Saint Thomas Aquinas and the medaeval scholastics, who sought to find a higher unity in nature through the concept of "theory" -- from "Theos", or "God". |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond wrote:
GOD = RAP [snip rest of crap] Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million deities. How is India doing, Georgie boy? Idiot. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 20, 6:14*pm, George Hammond wrote:
snip http://www.insolitology.com/topten/georgehammond.htm http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/...4-10/6530.html http://www.pacifier.com/~dkossy/hammond.html -Panama Floyd, Atlanta. aa#2015/KoBAAWA! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:28:30 GMT, George Hammond wrote: GOD = RAP (Relativistic Anthropic Principle) I'm curious, George. What would make you constantly come into these news groups (and all the other arenas) to bellow your outrageous lunacy - when all it does is show everyone you're and insane fool? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 20, 2:11*pm, George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:28:30 GMT, George Hammond wrote: * * * * * * * * * GOD = RAP * * * (Relativistic Anthropic Principle) * *The Anthropic Principle is well known to Science today. Carter, Barrow, Tipler, Wheeler and even Hawking and Penrose and Weinberg have written extensively on the subject. * *What Science DOESN'T KNOW is that the Anthropic Principle was actually discovered thousands of years ago by Religion. The irony of this has not been lost on Religious experts. * *Fact is, the "Anthropic Principle" simply says: "observables exist because observers exist". *After all, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if there was no such thing as an observer, then there would be no such thing as observables; since the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist. * *As far as Physics is concerned of course, "Man" is THE observer. *This proves that it is MAN who causes the Universe to exist. *After all, if all people died at 9am tomorrow, there would no longer be any observables, no universe, no time, no space; no nothing. *NOTHING WOULD "EXIST". * *Religion recognized this principle thousands of years ago, St. Augustine in particular. *In fact Bishop George Berkeley formally published the thesis 300 years ago, and as recently as 1900 Mary Baker Eddy founded the highly successful Christian Science Church on the principle. * It is therefore a fascinating irony that Science has finally stumbled on the PRACTICAL DISCOVERY of the Anthropic Principle... they finally recognized such elementary facts as WHY the Universe is 13 billion years old... i.e. that it took that long for Man to emerge, and without Man there is no "Universe"... therefore, the Anthropic Principle not only explains the "age of the Universe"... but that realization actually proves that the AP explains the existence of the Universe in the first place! * *OK... but the scientists have YET to realize this; that the existence itself, of anything, depends on the Anthropic Principle... and therefore, that the Anthropic Principle de facto explains the so called "Biblical Creation"... existence itself only came into being 200,000 years ago when Man appeared; Homo Sapiens sapiens. *Note that the Bible figures this was 6,000 years ago, but Anthropology was in a primitive state when the Bible was written, so they're about 194,000 short of the correct date of Creation... but still a good guess for nonscientific people in primitive times. * OK.... here's the REAL ENTERTAINMENT aspect of all this. Religious people are far smarter and more widely educated than Scientists (believe it or not), and consequently they view the Scientific "discovery" of the Anthropic Principle with MUCH AMUSEMENT, since they have known about it for thousands of years. * The Religious people of course realize that "Man created reality" and they further realize that Scientists think that "Reality created Man". *Knowing that it is futile to try and explain this to stubborn and nerd like Scientists, the Religious people are having a field day teasing the Physicists with long endless dissertations on how "scientifically peculiar" it is that the Universe seems to be so "finely tuned" to support life (when of course just the opposite is true as any dunderhead can see... that in fact "life is finely tuned to fit into the universe by Natural Selection). *And sure enough, the scientists fall for it every time, why we have scientists pointing out that "if the electron was 1% smaller, life couldn't exist", or "if the Earths orbit was 1% larger, we would be extinct", or "if there wasn't an excited state of Carbon at 6.67 Mev carbon based life couldn't exist", blah, blah, blah. * *However, it turns out that HAMMOND (2003) is slated to have the last laugh, a laugh at BOTH the scientists and the Theologians! * *HAMMOND of course long ago recognized that "the mind creates Reality, and therefore the Universe and everything in it.... but AMAZINGLY....Hammond also being a prodigious Relativity physicist psychology investigator (Psychometrics), accidentally discovered that human perception (of reality) is actually RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED. In other words, the reality you see, is actually a CURVED VERSION of true reality, and that this makes part of true reality INVISBLE to you, me, and every other person in the human race. *And this phenomena is known historically as "GOD". * * Yes... HAMMOND has discovered (and proved and peer published, 2003) that the universal Secular Trend Growth Deficit in Man, causes Man's perception (of sight, sound, touch, taste, smell) to be RELATIVISTICALLY CURVED thus rendering 20%, on average, of (normal) Reality to be invisible... thus scientifically explaining and proving the existence of God and Heaven in one fell swoop. * *Meanwhile the entertaining dialog between Physics and Religion over the so called "Anthropic Principle" continues to highly amuse those people in society who already full well know what God actually is, and I predict, that there will be much gnashing of teeth among the academic pedants when HAMMOND'S discovery of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof of God (SPOG for short) becomes common scientific knowlege. ===================================== * * *SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE *http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god * *mirror site: *http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com * * * GOD=G_uv * (a folk song on mp3) *http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== There are other universes without life. They don't need God. Smarty |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:14:08 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote: George Hammond wrote: GOD = RAP [snip rest of crap] Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million deities. How is India doing, Georgie boy? Idiot. [Hammond] The SPOG explains and PROVES why there are 30 demigods in Hindii; because there are 30 first order eigenvectors in Psychometric correlation matricess, worldwide . How's Los Angles doing Schwartz? If India was up your ass you'd know it. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
* *Fact is, the "Anthropic Principle" simply says: "observables exist because observers exist". *After all, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if there was no such thing as an observer, then there would be no such thing as observables; since the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist. If a system observable is a property of the system state that can be determined by some sequence of physical operations and if there was no such thing as an observer, then it is not determined that there would or would not be such things as observables even if the testimony of observers is the ONLY WAY we know that the observables exist since whether there is or is not someone existing doesn't determine determinability and the possibility of abstract thought processes whether they exist or not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable Humans must exist for determinability to be possible. Therefore All possibilities of determinability require humans to be possible? Isn't that like saying that humans were not possible before they exsisted and if so how is it possible that they could exist if they are not possible? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzfYsIC8ufs |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE | George Hammond | Physics - General Discussion | 462 | May 21st 08 01:52 PM |
| GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE | George Hammond | Physics - New Theories | 362 | May 21st 08 01:52 PM |
| GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE | George Hammond | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 388 | May 21st 08 01:52 PM |
| Anthropic principle | abracad | Physics - General Discussion | 26 | May 11th 04 07:39 PM |
| Anthropic principle | Bill Jefferys | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | October 25th 03 01:34 AM |