On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:04:19 +0200, Richard Anacker
wrote:

Sers George et all

George Hammond schrieb:

SNIP AGGRAVATED ATHEISM RANT

LOL.

richie


[Hammond]
Hey, this is personal between me and another Physics
professional, he's heckling me with his atheistic rants.
I've got no beef with you; German asshole!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:15:38 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:



If a physicist making measurements writes down the following figures as
lab measurements, how many significant figures are in each number, and
why?

12
[GH] 2 significant figures
13
[GH] 2 significant figures
0.000876
[GH] 3 significant figures
1.000876
[GH] 7 significant figures
120
[GH] 2 significant figures
120.
[GH] 2 significant figures
469.230
[GH] 5 significant figures

[GH] Why? Because I've got 2 significant college degrees
in Physics from accredited Universities in Massachusetts.


[Michael Moroney]
Congratulations. Only two wrong. 71%, a D. I guess if you did better in
your other courses you won't flunk out.


[Hammond]
Bull****....all 7 of my answers are CORRECT. 100%="A+".
You're the moron who doesn't know what a "significant
figure" is? Get the f--- outta here.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

Sers George et all

George Hammond schrieb:

German asshole!

Oh, how I love you being so rude, Cherie!
Show me the tiger in you - gimme the stallion! It looks so great when you
get this read head whilst sticking your finger in your arse. Go ahead, turn
me on!

But George, don't try too hard, you know, what the MD said last time - your
heart, remember...

richie, fascinated by this real masculine brain-machine!
--
Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:48:43 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:


"George Hammond" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:01:19 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:


[Doug, anonymouss unverified Physics PhD claimant]
you have shown no
connection with a god. This is just you hoping that no
one will notice that this assuming what you want to prove.


[Hammond]
My answer to that FALSE STATEMENT is posted below, and
you haven't answered it:


[Hammond]
You're so obviously incompetent its pathetic. Look, the
basic plot, as in any scientific investigation, is to
itemize the characteristics of the phenomenon, and then see
if there is any known simple scientific mechanism which
would explain it.

[John Smith]
You forgot one important step ... (as is usual for ignorant assholes like
you) - what is inivestigated must have a basis in REALITY!
Religious beliefs do NOT!


[Hammond]
WRONG no "basis in reality" need be assumed to
investigate any claimed phenomenon.
For instance, the claim that the Moon is made of green
cheese has no basis in reality, but it can be scientifcally
investigated by going to the Moon and taking a close look
under a microscope, which has been done; with a negative
result. Thus the claimed phenomenon is disproved.
On the other hand, in the case of the "claimed phenomenon
of God" as described in the King James Bible, Hammond HAS
DISCOVERED AND PROVEN that there is a simple comprehensive
scientific mechanism which, explains and PROVES that all the
claims made in the KJ are SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT.
You're an aggravated anti-religious jerk who doesn't know
what the f--- he's talking about. I'm an aggravated jerk,
but at least I know better than to be antireligious, moron.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:15:38 +0000 (UTC),
(Michael Moroney) wrote:


If a physicist making measurements writes down the following figures as
lab measurements, how many significant figures are in each number, and
why?

12
[GH] 2 significant figures
13
[GH] 2 significant figures
0.000876
[GH] 3 significant figures
1.000876
[GH] 7 significant figures
120
[GH] 2 significant figures
120.
[GH] 2 significant figures
469.230
[GH] 5 significant figures
[GH] Why? Because I've got 2 significant college degrees
in Physics from accredited Universities in Massachusetts.

[Michael Moroney]
Congratulations. Only two wrong. 71%, a D. I guess if you did better in
your other courses you won't flunk out.


[Hammond]
Bull****....all 7 of my answers are CORRECT. 100%="A+".
You're the moron who doesn't know what a "significant
figure" is? Get the f--- outta here.
They must give out easy degrees where you went to school since
you are wrong here too. Or is this why you failed out of graduate
school?


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:04:19 +0200, Richard Anacker
wrote:

Sers George et all

George Hammond schrieb:

SNIP AGGRAVATED ATHEISM RANT
LOL.

richie


[Hammond]
Hey, this is personal between me and another Physics
professional, he's heckling me with his atheistic rants.
I've got no beef with you; German asshole!

So you are being careful to only insult one person at a time?

Pointing out your mistakes is not heckling, it is trying to
help you. Ranting is insults, swearing and typing in all
capital letters. Look it up in a dictionary.

=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:33 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:47:54 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:


SNIP AGGRAVATED ATHEISM RANT


[Hammond]
Your post contains nothing but UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS
lacking any factual evidence, while my post is based on peer
reviewed and published papers.
Your commentary is idiotic, juvenile and reflects a low
intelligence and little proficiency or experience in
Science.
You CLAIM to have a "PhD in Physics" but refuse to cite
your CV, your real name, or any verification of such. Your
commentary does not rise above the level of the average jr.
grade laboratory technician. Therefore, until you provide
verification of your educational claims, I must presume you
are a FAKE, a FRAUD and an IMPOSTER, and you are certainly
typical of the average ranting aggravated psychotic
atheistic nut.
Many atheist frauds claim false credentials, such as T.
Wake from alt.atheism who also claimed he was a "Physics
PhD" but investigation showed he was in fact a civil
engineer employed in bridge building, or TMG who claimed to
be a "Physics PhD" but who actually turned out to be a WHOI
("Whoee") employee who has a degree in "Ocean Physics" which
any halfwit engineering level graduate could achieve.
Judging from your language and science content surely you
fall in the same category, a half baked near do well
"applied physics" nut, at best, and probably unemployed
judging from your lengthy weekday posts. You're a worthless
screwball.
Finally, because all these screwballs claim they can't
post their CV because they have "high security gov't jobs"
and must remain anonymous (which is crap); I posted a TEST
QUESTION that any COMPETENT Physics PhD should be able to
answer off the top of his head:

Physics PhD Test Question
What is the relationship between the
Dirac gamma matrices of QED and the
Christoffel Symbols of General Relativity?

You don't know the answer, and can't answer the question
(and you won't find it on Google either), proving that
you're some kind of half baked "applied physics" jerk who
can't understand the SPOG which is based on "real Physics".
Screw psycho, go back to alt.atheism and talk to your
asshole buddies, and get off this thread. You're worthless
as a scientist and worst of all intellectualLy BORING!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================


[Doug, anonymous unverified Physics PhD claimant]
So Hammond is unable to support his laughable proposals so he
snips the part that shows him to be wrong and tells people to
leave. That shows he knows he is wrong and has no business bothering
intelligent people with his ignorance or hope or delusions or whatever
it is that makes him say really embarrassing things so that he looks
really bad.



[Hammond]
Look jerk, you haven't posted ONE ON TOPIC SCIENTIFIC
STATMENT since you arrived on this thread. All you do is
keep mouthing the hand waving phrase "word salad" in
response to everything I say..............Finally I went
looking for the reason for this "non-scientific response" by
a supposed "Physics PhD"........ and sure enough... it turns
out you're a FAKE, a FRAUD, and an IMPOSTER claiming an
unverifiable degree and and posting anonymously.
To top it all off, you can't even answer a "physicis PhD
test question" that any COMPETENT Physics PhD could answer
off the top of his head in 25 words.
Turns out, you're nothing but a ranting atheistic nut.
If you can't say something on topic, and scientific.......
screw.... get outta here.... you're boring and worthless.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:00:46 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:



SNIP AD HOMINEM RANT


[Hammond]
Your post contains nothing but UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS
lacking any factual evidence, while my post is based on peer
reviewed and published papers.
Your commentary is idiotic, juvenile and reflects a low
intelligence and little proficiency or experience in
Science.
You CLAIM to have a "PhD in Physics" but refuse to cite
your CV, your real name, or any verification of such. Your
commentary does not rise above the level of the average jr.
grade laboratory technician. Therefore, until you provide
verification of your educational claims, I must presume you
are a FAKE, a FRAUD and an IMPOSTER, and you are certainly
typical of the average ranting aggravated psychotic
atheistic nut.
Many atheist frauds claim false credentials, such as T.
Wake from alt.atheism who also claimed he was a "Physics
PhD" but investigation showed he was in fact a civil
engineer employed in bridge building, or TMG who claimed to
be a "Physics PhD" but who actually turned out to be a WHOI
("Whoee") employee who has a degree in "Ocean Physics" which
any halfwit engineering level graduate could achieve.
Judging from your language and science content surely you
fall in the same category, a half baked near do well
"applied physics" nut, at best, and probably unemployed
judging from your lengthy weekday posts. You're a worthless
screwball.
Finally, because all these screwballs claim they can't
post their CV because they have "high security gov't jobs"
and must remain anonymous (which is crap); I posted a TEST
QUESTION that any COMPETENT Physics PhD should be able to
answer off the top of his head:

Physics PhD Test Question
What is the relationship between the
Dirac gamma matrices of QED and the
Christoffel Symbols of General Relativity?

You don't know the answer, and can't answer the question
(and you won't find it on Google either), proving that
you're some kind of half baked "applied physics" jerk who
can't understand the SPOG which is based on "real Physics".
Screw psycho, go back to alt.atheism and talk to your
asshole buddies, and get off this thread. You're worthless
as a scientist and worst of all intellectualLy BORING!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:48:43 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:01:19 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

[Doug, anonymouss unverified Physics PhD claimant]
you have shown no
connection with a god. This is just you hoping that no
one will notice that this assuming what you want to prove.


[Hammond]
My answer to that FALSE STATEMENT is posted below, and
you haven't answered it:

You must have snipped that answer as well as it is not posted
below.

[Hammond]
You're so obviously incompetent its pathetic. Look, the
basic plot, as in any scientific investigation, is to
itemize the characteristics of the phenomenon, and then see
if there is any known simple scientific mechanism which
would explain it.
[John Smith]
You forgot one important step ... (as is usual for ignorant assholes like
you) - what is inivestigated must have a basis in REALITY!
Religious beliefs do NOT!

Hammond does not need something to be true to prove it.
He has already shown that either 12=13 or that the Greeks
did not know how to count.


[Hammond]
WRONG no "basis in reality" need be assumed to
investigate any claimed phenomenon.
For instance, the claim that the Moon is made of green
cheese has no basis in reality, but it can be scientifcally
investigated by going to the Moon and taking a close look
under a microscope, which has been done; with a negative
result. Thus the claimed phenomenon is disproved.
On the other hand, in the case of the "claimed phenomenon
of God" as described in the King James Bible, Hammond HAS
DISCOVERED AND PROVEN that there is a simple comprehensive
scientific mechanism which, explains and PROVES that all the
claims made in the KJ are SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT.
This is as wild a claim as you have made. You know that Matthew
and Mark made completely different claims about the residency
of Joseph and Mary don't you? They cannot both be right.

You know, if you have read Mark that Jesus's lineage is trace
back to David and then to Adam through his father Joseph. It
is clear that there was no silly business about virgin birth
believed at that time. If Joseph was not the father, his
lineage would not be important. That part alone shows the
bible is not to be believed. Thus your "proof" is similarly
not to be believed.

You're an aggravated anti-religious jerk who doesn't know
what the f--- he's talking about. I'm an aggravated jerk,
but at least I know better than to be antireligious, moron.

And why is that?

=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:33 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:47:54 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

SNIP AGGRAVATED ATHEISM RANT

[Hammond]
Your post contains nothing but UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS
lacking any factual evidence, while my post is based on peer
reviewed and published papers.
Your commentary is idiotic, juvenile and reflects a low
intelligence and little proficiency or experience in
Science.
You CLAIM to have a "PhD in Physics" but refuse to cite
your CV, your real name, or any verification of such. Your
commentary does not rise above the level of the average jr.
grade laboratory technician. Therefore, until you provide
verification of your educational claims, I must presume you
are a FAKE, a FRAUD and an IMPOSTER, and you are certainly
typical of the average ranting aggravated psychotic
atheistic nut.
Many atheist frauds claim false credentials, such as T.
Wake from alt.atheism who also claimed he was a "Physics
PhD" but investigation showed he was in fact a civil
engineer employed in bridge building, or TMG who claimed to
be a "Physics PhD" but who actually turned out to be a WHOI
("Whoee") employee who has a degree in "Ocean Physics" which
any halfwit engineering level graduate could achieve.
Judging from your language and science content surely you
fall in the same category, a half baked near do well
"applied physics" nut, at best, and probably unemployed
judging from your lengthy weekday posts. You're a worthless
screwball.
Finally, because all these screwballs claim they can't
post their CV because they have "high security gov't jobs"
and must remain anonymous (which is crap); I posted a TEST
QUESTION that any COMPETENT Physics PhD should be able to
answer off the top of his head:

Physics PhD Test Question
What is the relationship between the
Dirac gamma matrices of QED and the
Christoffel Symbols of General Relativity?

You don't know the answer, and can't answer the question
(and you won't find it on Google either), proving that
you're some kind of half baked "applied physics" jerk who
can't understand the SPOG which is based on "real Physics".
Screw psycho, go back to alt.atheism and talk to your
asshole buddies, and get off this thread. You're worthless
as a scientist and worst of all intellectualLy BORING!
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

[Doug, anonymous unverified Physics PhD claimant]
So Hammond is unable to support his laughable proposals so he
snips the part that shows him to be wrong and tells people to
leave. That shows he knows he is wrong and has no business bothering
intelligent people with his ignorance or hope or delusions or whatever
it is that makes him say really embarrassing things so that he looks
really bad.



[Hammond]
Look jerk, you haven't posted ONE ON TOPIC SCIENTIFIC
STATMENT since you arrived on this thread. All you do is
keep mouthing the hand waving phrase "word salad" in
response to everything I say..............Finally I went
looking for the reason for this "non-scientific response" by
a supposed "Physics PhD"........ and sure enough... it turns
out you're a FAKE, a FRAUD, and an IMPOSTER claiming an
unverifiable degree and and posting anonymously.
So you used the same methods you used in your spog-- wild
speculation and delusion.
My degrees are perfectly fine and are not subject to your
approval.

Growth deficit, fusion frequency and other nonsense do not
constitute any kind of proof. You should know that as well
but you get mad when people point out your mistakes.

To top it all off, you can't even answer a "physicis PhD
test question" that any COMPETENT Physics PhD could answer
off the top of his head in 25 words.
Lets see, you claim to have somewhere between 2 and 2.5 degrees
(I assume to 3 significant figures) but you cannot even
spell physics. Was that why you failed graduate school?

Turns out, you're nothing but a ranting atheistic nut.
If you can't say something on topic, and scientific.......
screw.... get outta here.... you're boring and worthless.

Maybe boring and worthless to you but I am right in my
physics and I have my degrees and career to look on.
You have ignored all the science I have pointed out as
well as your religious mistakes. Proofs were not done
that way in my graduate school.


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================