On 27 apr, 14:36, George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:14:12 -0700 (PDT),

" wrote:

You are badly informed again!

[Hammond]
* *I doubt it and you certainly haven't proved it.

[Peter van Velzen]
About 50% of the world population believes in the monotheistic god.
The can be roughly separated in three groups: Roman Catholics, other
Christians and Muslims.

[Hammond]
* *Despite your opinion, the average person is not a pedant.
The average person believes that "God" is an "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world"; *what the
Native American Indians called "The Great Sky Chief". *And
FYI, the SPOG proves that this ancient and universal belief
is in fact, scientifically TRUE. *Common belief also holds
that God has many "Angels", or call the "gods", or call them
"demigods" or whatever you want. *Since we're arguing
irrelevant OPINION here let me mention that I'm 66 and
you're 30.... which means I know twice as much as you know
about what the average person believes. Furthermore, I'm not
interested in yakking about matters of opinion with
aggravated amateurs with no academic credentials.

[Peter van Velzen]
The other half can be roughly separated in three groups too.
Those who believe in multiple gods (mostly Hindus)

[Hammond]
* *The Hindu's have a supreme deity which is a triune God
called the "Trimurti" (Sanskrit-"the trimorphic God")
consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. *This parallels the
Christian Trinity. *All the other "gods" are actually what
Christian call "Angels" (or demigods).
* *All of this is explained and PROVEN by the SPOG which
shows that this hierarchy appears as an EIGENVECTOR
HEIRARCHY in Psychometry, which is accurate to 3 significant
figures experimentally. *Unfortunately you lack the
educational qualifications to discuss Factor Analysis
(Linear Algebra).
* *I will warn you that I only engage in extended
conversation with amateurs if they have a positive attitude,
otherwise they have nothing to offer.
* *I will engage in extended discussion with negative
aggravated educated professionals however.

[Peter van Velzen]
Those who do not believe in gods (mostly atheists)

[Hammond]
* *Generally atheists are of little interest, unless they
become a political force, which seems unlikely. *On the
other hand some of them are highly educated such as Bertrand
Russell, whose analysis of the Omphalos theory is of
fundamental significance to the SPOG.

[Peter van Velzen]
Those who rather ignore the question (mostly Buddhists)

[Hammond]
* Buddhism is a small compared to the other 4 major faiths.
However, I think Buddhists have a fundamental belief in a
supreme deity.

[Peter van Velzen]
O yes, of course most people within these groups tends to think the
members of the other groups - and many amongst there own group - Are
very very wrong.
I guess they are right about most of them :-)

Duh? *I can't make much sense of this statement.

[Peter van Velzen]
Before you go out and post on the internet,
you should first do your homework

[Hammond]
You don't know who you're talking to.
* *I've been studying Religion and Psychology for 25 years
and Physics for 40. I have 2 degrees in Physics. *You on the
other hand probably don't even have a college degree.

[Peter van Velzen]
That would spare us a lot of words
especially the words "crackpot" and "asshole"
which in my opinion are not very fruitful.

[Hammond]
* I'm not worried about Fruits.

Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands

=====================================
* * *SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
*http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
* *mirror site:
*http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
* * * GOD=G_uv * (a folk song on mp3)
*http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

My opinion doesn't matter
fact is that only half of the world's population believes in your type
of God. Not the 90% that you claimed.

These facts are available to anyone who wants too know.
I'd suggest you get them.
And I hope to see your next post.
AFTER you do!

Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands.

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:37:06 -0700, doug doug@none wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:


[Hammond]
Look Dutch, Usenet is crawling with criminals, cons
posting from death row, drug addicts, drunks, child
molesters, pedophiles, gun nuts, Nazis, serial killers, wife
beaters, anti Semitic psychos, war criminals, torturers,
sadistic kidnappers, sex trade slave masters, people dying
of terminal V.D., stalkers, foreign spies, suicide bombers,
homicidal Jihadists, KKK members and psychos of all
description. Fact is "normal" people may be in the minority
on Usenet.
All of these people are interested in whether or not
there is a God, including Ken The Crackpot.

[Doug, unconfirmed PhD Physics claimant]
No, most people have already made up their mind which of
the huge number of choices of gods they want to accept.


[Hammond]
You're a halfass idiot; 90% of the human race believes
there is ONE GOD who is generally defined as "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world". Normal
people also know there are many Saints, Apostles, Martyrs,
Prophets, etc who are many times loosely called "demigods".
that is what the NORMAL, AVERAGE PERSON in the human race
believes.

This is going to come as quite a shock to the Chinese and
the Indians (who, by the way, comprise much more than
10% of the human race). You are picking an anthropomorphic
god that man created in his own image. You make unsupported
assertions about what people believe.

However, you are a pseudo intellectual screwball who
would have NO IDEA what the average person believes.

[Hammond]
Until you can
empathetically talk to all of them,
[Doug, unconfirmed PhD Physics claimant]
Swearing and insults are a different kind of empathy than
most people think of.


[Hammond]
I'm not tlaking to "most peope" I'm talking to Usenet
hecklers and psychos, including you. Four letter words are
familiar currency to hecklers and psychos.
People pointing out your mistakes may not make you happy but
the truth is what it is. Your swearing in reply only shows
even more so that you have no arguments to make and are only
trying to bluster and bully.



[Hammond]
you're not qualified to
be toying with the world's first scientific proof of God by
posting frivolous amateur arguments.

[Doug, unconfirmed PhD Physics claimant]
Your scientific proof of god is not scientific, is in no way
a proof and has nothing to do with any of the different gods.

[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion. The proof has been peer published
in two academic journals and the papers are posted on my
website, and obviously you haven't even bothered to read my
website ... because you're NOT a scientist as you claim,
actually you're just another run of the mill psycho and
athist heckler.
Vanity press is not peer reviewed. Posting papers on websites
means nothing.
Two of my diplomas were signed by Ronald Reagan. That tells you
when and where.


You ought to know,
you're from Holland and your parents saw the 3rd Reich
occupy your country and murder thousands of innocent people,
including Anne Frank.
"Man up" Dutch, and get with the program, I'm a real
physicist, the SPOG is real science, and it's serious
business.

[Doug, unconfirmed PhD Physics claimant]
Yes, we know, you flunked out of graduate school and are
a humorist. The SPOG is only for laughing at.
No one anywhere believes it.

[Hammond]
You claim that you're a PhD physicist, yet you refuse to
post your CV, use an anymous name so your CV can't be
checked, and refuse to answer a test question that a PhD
physicist should be able to answer, namely:

If you're a Physicis PhD then prove it by answering this
Physics test question for us:

What is the relationship between the Dirac
Gamma matrices of QED and the Christoffel Symbols
of General relativity?
You are really concerned with this question but you have
already told me you would not believe my answer so, if
you want the answer, maybe you should go to your local
physics department and ask them. But it is not a good
idea to tell them beforehand that you will not believe
the answer.
Or you could use Google.


A 25 word answer will be sufficient.
If you can't answer that question off the top of your
head then you're an imposter and a phony.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.... PUT UP OR SHUT UP
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug doug@none wrote:

[Hammond]
1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists.

[Doug, Physics PhD claimant]
This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you
are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA.

[Hammond]
YOU'RE STUPID!
The SPOG is a 3 significant figure proven discovery that
Psychometric Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to
Linearized Gravity in Relativity.
This is SCIENTIFIC PROOF that Man's "subjective reality"
(subjective spacetime) differs by a MAJOR REATIVISTIC
CURVATURE from "objective reality" (objective spacetime).
This PROVES that the very long standing, indeed ancient, and
historically unrefuted "unsupported assumption" you refer to
above, is manifestly now a PROVEN FACT. QED, God
isscientifically explained and proven.
This is just a bunch of word salad. There is no content to
discuss here. Your earlier claim that 12=13 certainly is not
accurate to 3 significant figures. Making statements that
are just random and then trying to claim they are somehow
proof of something does not fly with anyone, much less
any scientists.


[Hammond]
2. When Man came into existence 200k yrs ago Time and the
Universe came into existence simultaneously
including it's 13 billion year evolutionary history.


[Doug, phoney PhD Physics claimant]
Man has been around much longer than that. You can go to Nice
and see a hut which is 300,000 years old and go to Menton and
see human artifacts from nearly a million years ago.
the rest of your statement is laughable.

[Hammond]
Boy, you really are a stupid, shallow, aggravated
imbecile! PhD in Physics, you gotta be kidding!
Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
says:
"DNA evidence indicates that modern humans originated in
Africa about 200,000 years ago."
Humans come from a continuous line of evolution over a period
of many millions of years. You may not like it but that is
the scientific view.


200.000 is the commonly accepted age of Homo Sapiens
sapiens, your claims about Nice and Menton notwithstanding.
Besides, you're arguing GRADE SCHOOL IRRELEVANT TRIVIA. A
real PhD in Physics wouldn't be arguing 200 vs 300 thousand
years or 12 vs. 13 gods
No, you are arguing 200,000 instead of a few million years.
Look at the website for the museum in Menton and you will
see the information about the million year old human artifacts.

In science, when you are counting things, the difference between
12 and 13 as a prediction is a complete failure of the prediction.
In any case, you missed the many millions of Hindu gods, not to
mention the Mormons.


when CLEARLY anyone with half a
brain in his head can see that in the face of the discovery
that has been made, such arguments are TRIVIAL AND
IRRELEVANT.
You are correct that presenting wrong numbers in support of
random statements is irrelevant since the random statements
you make are meaningless and thus irrelevent.

The conclusion is that you're JUST ANOTHER
AGGRAVATED PHONEY.
You misspelled phony. You also seem to be the aggravated one.
I am enjoying this.

As for arguing that there are HSs artifacts from a
million years ago, you're just stupid... there is no such
thing.... asshole!

So you have to ignore facts in a desperate attempt to not
admit that you are wrong. Ignoring facts is generally considered
to be bad science, particularly when you are wanting to prove
something. I note your lack of facts requires you to resort to
swearing.

[Hammond]
You claim you're a physics PhD but refuse to post your CV
and post anonymously so it can't be verified.
If you're a Physics PhD then prove it by answering this
Physics test question for us:

What is the relationship between the Dirac
Gamma matrices of QED and the Christoffel Symbols
of General relativity?

A 25 word answer will be sufficient.
If you can't answer that question off the top of your
head then you're an imposter and a phony.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.... PUT UP OR SHUT UP
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:39:20 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:

On 27 apr, 14:36, George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:14:12 -0700 (PDT),

" wrote:

You are badly informed again!

[Hammond]
* *I doubt it and you certainly haven't proved it.

[Peter van Velzen]
About 50% of the world population believes in the monotheistic god.
The can be roughly separated in three groups: Roman Catholics, other
Christians and Muslims.

[Hammond]
* *Despite your opinion, the average person is not a pedant.
The average person believes that "God" is an "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world"; *what the
Native American Indians called "The Great Sky Chief". *And
FYI, the SPOG proves that this ancient and universal belief
is in fact, scientifically TRUE. *Common belief also holds
that God has many "Angels", or call the "gods", or call them
"demigods" or whatever you want. *Since we're arguing
irrelevant OPINION here let me mention that I'm 66 and
you're 30.... which means I know twice as much as you know
about what the average person believes. Furthermore, I'm not
interested in yakking about matters of opinion with
aggravated amateurs with no academic credentials.

[Peter van Velzen]
The other half can be roughly separated in three groups too.
Those who believe in multiple gods (mostly Hindus)

[Hammond]
* *The Hindu's have a supreme deity which is a triune God
called the "Trimurti" (Sanskrit-"the trimorphic God")
consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. *This parallels the
Christian Trinity. *All the other "gods" are actually what
Christian call "Angels" (or demigods).
* *All of this is explained and PROVEN by the SPOG which
shows that this hierarchy appears as an EIGENVECTOR
HEIRARCHY in Psychometry, which is accurate to 3 significant
figures experimentally. *Unfortunately you lack the
educational qualifications to discuss Factor Analysis
(Linear Algebra).
* *I will warn you that I only engage in extended
conversation with amateurs if they have a positive attitude,
otherwise they have nothing to offer.
* *I will engage in extended discussion with negative
aggravated educated professionals however.

[Peter van Velzen]
Those who do not believe in gods (mostly atheists)

[Hammond]
* *Generally atheists are of little interest, unless they
become a political force, which seems unlikely. *On the
other hand some of them are highly educated such as Bertrand
Russell, whose analysis of the Omphalos theory is of
fundamental significance to the SPOG.

[Peter van Velzen]
Those who rather ignore the question (mostly Buddhists)

[Hammond]
* Buddhism is a small compared to the other 4 major faiths.
However, I think Buddhists have a fundamental belief in a
supreme deity.

[Peter van Velzen]
O yes, of course most people within these groups tends to think the
members of the other groups - and many amongst there own group - Are
very very wrong.
I guess they are right about most of them :-)

Duh? *I can't make much sense of this statement.

[Peter van Velzen]
Before you go out and post on the internet,
you should first do your homework

[Hammond]
You don't know who you're talking to.
* *I've been studying Religion and Psychology for 25 years
and Physics for 40. I have 2 degrees in Physics. *You on the
other hand probably don't even have a college degree.

[Peter van Velzen]
That would spare us a lot of words
especially the words "crackpot" and "asshole"
which in my opinion are not very fruitful.

[Hammond]
* I'm not worried about Fruits.

Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands

=====================================
* * *SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
*http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
* *mirror site:
*http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
* * * GOD=G_uv * (a folk song on mp3)
*http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================



[Peter van Velzen]
My opinion doesn't matter

[Hammond]
You got that one right!

[Peter van Velzen]
fact is that only half of the world's population believes in your type
of God. Not the 90% that you claimed.


[Hammond]
Baloney, your statement defies common knowlege.
Christianity, Islam and Judaism alone account for 60% of the
world population (the most powerful half of the world). The
God of Hinduism (another 15%) is also near identical.
Your speculations about what the rest of humanity believes
is neither here nor there.

[Peter van Velzen]
These facts are available to anyone who wants too know.

[Hammond]
No **** Sherlock, we know all about it.

[Peter van Velzen]
I'd suggest you get them.

[Hammond]
Been there done that; before you were born.

[Peter van Velzen]
And I hope to see your next post.
AFTER you do!

[Hammond]
Whatever that gibberish 's supposed to mean?

Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands.


[Hammond]
You're all through punk... you're dime a dozen on Usenet.
Now that you've discovered this is not an amateur discovery
and you sound like a fool; go back to your beer and computer
games.
Or join your asshole buddies Ken and John and start
posting froth at the mouth heckling, Dork.
Yaaawwnnnnnnn...
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:14:12 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:


You are badly informed again!

[Hammond]
I doubt it and you certainly haven't proved it.

You are trying to ignore the truth again.

[Peter van Velzen]
About 50% of the world population believes in the monotheistic god.
The can be roughly separated in three groups: Roman Catholics, other
Christians and Muslims.



[Hammond]
Despite your opinion, the average person is not a pedant.
The average person believes that "God" is an "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world";
And what reference do you use to support this assertion which
is demonstrably wrong.


what the
Native American Indians called "The Great Sky Chief". And
FYI, the SPOG proves that this ancient and universal belief
is in fact, scientifically TRUE.

Word salad proves nothing. It does give us something to laugh
at though.

Common belief also holds
that God has many "Angels", or call the "gods", or call them
"demigods" or whatever you want. Since we're arguing
irrelevant OPINION
This is your irrelevant opinion. Facts are what are required
for a proof.

here let me mention that I'm 66 and
you're 30.... which means I know twice as much as you know
about what the average person believes.
Why does that follow? Age does not necessarily mean
knowledge.

Furthermore, I'm not
interested in yakking about matters of opinion with
aggravated amateurs with no academic credentials.

No, you are not interested in talking with those who
point out your mistakes.

[Peter van Velzen]
The other half can be roughly separated in three groups too.
Those who believe in multiple gods (mostly Hindus)

[Hammond]
The Hindu's have a supreme deity which is a triune God
called the "Trimurti" (Sanskrit-"the trimorphic God")
consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. This parallels the
Christian Trinity. All the other "gods" are actually what
Christian call "Angels" (or demigods).
All of this is explained and PROVEN by the SPOG which
shows that this hierarchy appears as an EIGENVECTOR
HEIRARCHY in Psychometry, which is accurate to 3 significant
figures experimentally. Unfortunately you lack the
educational qualifications to discuss Factor Analysis
(Linear Algebra).

You should look at what you have written. Your unsupported
assumptions look terribly silly.

I will warn you that I only engage in extended
conversation with amateurs if they have a positive attitude,
otherwise they have nothing to offer.
I will engage in extended discussion with negative
aggravated educated professionals however.

Only people who do not know any science whatsoever will have
a positive attitude about your views. If you want that, you
should leave out any science groups since there will be
people who point out your errors.

[Peter van Velzen]
Those who do not believe in gods (mostly atheists)


[Hammond]
Generally atheists are of little interest, unless they
become a political force, which seems unlikely. On the
other hand some of them are highly educated such as Bertrand
Russell, whose analysis of the Omphalos theory is of
fundamental significance to the SPOG.
[Peter van Velzen]
Those who rather ignore the question (mostly Buddhists)

[Hammond]
Buddhism is a small compared to the other 4 major faiths.
However, I think Buddhists have a fundamental belief in a
supreme deity.
Think again.


[Peter van Velzen]
O yes, of course most people within these groups tends to think the
members of the other groups - and many amongst there own group - Are
very very wrong.
I guess they are right about most of them :-)


Duh? I can't make much sense of this statement.

[Peter van Velzen]
Before you go out and post on the internet,
you should first do your homework


[Hammond]
You don't know who you're talking to.
I've been studying Religion and Psychology for 25 years
and Physics for 40. I have 2 degrees in Physics. You on the
other hand probably don't even have a college degree.

You need to look at what you are trying to push as truth.
Your babble about both science and religion is not something
that looks like it came from anyone with an education.

[Peter van Velzen]
That would spare us a lot of words
especially the words "crackpot" and "asshole"
which in my opinion are not very fruitful.


[Hammond]
I'm not worried about Fruits.

Defined as those who point out your mistakes.

Peter van Velzen
April 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands


=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:36:18 GMT, George Hammond
wrote:



You are badly informed again!

[Hammond]
I doubt it and you certainly haven't proved it.

That's George.
Bellow totally ignorant, unscientiic and unsupported statements - then,
arrogantly and ignorantly, i9nsult others because they cannot prove that his
invented crap is really crap.



[Peter van Velzen]
About 50% of the world population believes in the monotheistic god.
The can be roughly separated in three groups: Roman Catholics, other
Christians and Muslims.



[Hammond]
Despite your opinion, the average person is not a pedant.
The average person believes that "God" is an "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world"; what the
Native American Indians called "The Great Sky Chief". And
FYI, the SPOG proves that this ancient and universal belief
is in fact, scientifically TRUE.

The S.P.O.Crap proves nothing more than your own insanity - and lack of
scientific abilities.


Common belief also holds
that God has many "Angels", or call the "gods", or call them
"demigods" or whatever you want. Since we're arguing
irrelevant OPINION here let me mention that I'm 66 and
you're 30.... which means I know twice as much as you know
about what the average person believes.

Bwahahaaaaaaaa................................
No; in this particular case - it seems to mean that you are twiace as insane
as the other guy.



Furthermore, I'm not
interested in yakking about matters of opinion with
aggravated amateurs with no academic credentials.

You're, obviously, not interested in presenting anything either truthful,
honorable or even scientific about the **** you spew.

"marc" wrote in message
...
"George Hammond" wrote in message
...

CLEARLY anyone with half a brain in his head..

And even more clearly, anyone with more than half a brain in his head
immediately recognises Hammond's irrational spewing as emanating from a
severely deranged mind. Hammond must be a rare example of a literal
half-wit.

Marc

and THAT's giving him the benefit of the doubt.

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug doug@none wrote:

[Hammond]
1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists.

[Doug, Physics PhD claimant]
This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you
are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA.

[Hammond]
YOU'RE STUPID!
The SPOG is a 3 significant figure proven discovery that
Psychometric Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to
Linearized Gravity in Relativity.
This is SCIENTIFIC PROOF that Man's "subjective reality"
(subjective spacetime) differs by a MAJOR REATIVISTIC
CURVATURE from "objective reality" (objective spacetime).
This PROVES that the very long standing, indeed ancient, and
historically unrefuted "unsupported assumption" you refer to
above, is manifestly now a PROVEN FACT. QED, God
isscientifically explained and proven.

[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
This is just a bunch of word salad.

Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
Fact is you are SCIENTIFICALLY UNQUALIFIED to even read
the above statment because you don't even know what
"Psychometry Factor Analysis" is, nor are you aware that
there are "3 orthogonal cleaveages of the brain which CAUSE
THE 13 "CUBIC" EIGENVECTORS of PSYCHOMETRY.
You don't know what you're talking about.

[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
There is no content to
discuss here.


Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
The only thing that is "no content" is your post.

[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
Your earlier claim that 12=13 certainly is not
accurate to 3 significant figures.


[Hammond]
Never said it was.
What I said is that the 13 Factor Analytic eigenvectors
that represent the "Olympian Gods" are THEMSELVES MEASURED
TO 3 SIGNFICANT FIGURE ACCURACY EXPERIMENTALLY. The fact
that there are 13 rather than 12 is irrelevant in that it is
only "approximately" known that the Egypto-Greco-Roman
pantheon consisted of approximately "a dozen gods".


[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
Making statements that
are just random and then trying to claim they are somehow
proof of something does not fly with anyone, much less
any scientists.

[Hammond]
The US Constitution and Einstein sound like "random
words" to totally ignorant, lazy and aggravated people. That
doesn't mean they are.
Fact is, you simply don't know what you're talking about,
and could care less.... you're interest doesn't go beyond
comparing 12 to 13. You're just another psycho heckler.
totally worthless.


[Hammond]
Snip rest of psycho drivel.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug doug@none wrote:

[Hammond]
1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists.
[Doug, Physics PhD claimant]
This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you
are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA.

[Hammond]
YOU'RE STUPID!
The SPOG is a 3 significant figure proven discovery that
Psychometric Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to
Linearized Gravity in Relativity.
This is SCIENTIFIC PROOF that Man's "subjective reality"
(subjective spacetime) differs by a MAJOR REATIVISTIC
CURVATURE from "objective reality" (objective spacetime).
This PROVES that the very long standing, indeed ancient, and
historically unrefuted "unsupported assumption" you refer to
above, is manifestly now a PROVEN FACT. QED, God
isscientifically explained and proven.
[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
This is just a bunch of word salad.

Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
Fact is you are SCIENTIFICALLY UNQUALIFIED to even read
the above statment because you don't even know what
"Psychometry Factor Analysis" is, nor are you aware that
there are "3 orthogonal cleaveages of the brain which CAUSE
THE 13 "CUBIC" EIGENVECTORS of PSYCHOMETRY.
You don't know what you're talking about.
[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
There is no content to
discuss here.


Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.
The only thing that is "no content" is your post.
[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
Your earlier claim that 12=13 certainly is not
accurate to 3 significant figures.


[Hammond]
Never said it was.
What I said is that the 13 Factor Analytic eigenvectors
that represent the "Olympian Gods" are THEMSELVES MEASURED
TO 3 SIGNFICANT FIGURE ACCURACY EXPERIMENTALLY. The fact
that there are 13 rather than 12 is irrelevant in that it is
only "approximately" known that the Egypto-Greco-Roman
pantheon consisted of approximately "a dozen gods".

You are making amazingly inconsistent claims. First you are
claiming that the christian god is to only one and then you
claim to have proof of the number of Greek gods. None of
these are real. The egyptian gods are not real. You cannot
make any proof about the number of things that are not real.


[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
Making statements that
are just random and then trying to claim they are somehow
proof of something does not fly with anyone, much less
any scientists.

[Hammond]
The US Constitution and Einstein sound like "random
words" to totally ignorant, lazy and aggravated people. That
doesn't mean they are.
Any educated person sees the coherence of the Constitution and
scientists understand Einstein. However, your random babble
means nothing and is just babble.

Fact is, you simply don't know what you're talking about,
and could care less.... you're interest doesn't go beyond
comparing 12 to 13. You're just another psycho heckler.
totally worthless.


You really hate it when it is pointed out that you are wrong.
I would have thought that you were used to it by now.
Has anyone ever agreed with you.

[Hammond]
Snip rest of psycho drivel.

No you left the drivel below still in the post.

=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:19:53 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:37:06 -0700, doug doug@none wrote:

George Hammond wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:


[Hammond]
Look Dutch, Usenet is crawling with criminals, cons
posting from death row, drug addicts, drunks, child
molesters, pedophiles, gun nuts, Nazis, serial killers, wife
beaters, anti Semitic psychos, war criminals, torturers,
sadistic kidnappers, sex trade slave masters, people dying
of terminal V.D., stalkers, foreign spies, suicide bombers,
homicidal Jihadists, KKK members and psychos of all
description. Fact is "normal" people may be in the minority
on Usenet.
All of these people are interested in whether or not
there is a God, including Ken The Crackpot.

[Doug, unconfirmed PhD Physics claimant]
No, most people have already made up their mind which of
the huge number of choices of gods they want to accept.


[Hammond]
You're a halfass idiot; 90% of the human race believes
there is ONE GOD who is generally defined as "an invisible
man who lives in the sky and rules the world". Normal
people also know there are many Saints, Apostles, Martyrs,
Prophets, etc who are many times loosely called "demigods".
that is what the NORMAL, AVERAGE PERSON in the human race
believes.



[Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant]
This is going to come as quite a shock to the Chinese and
the Indians (who, by the way, comprise much more than
10% of the human race). You are picking an anthropomorphic
god that man created in his own image. You make unsupported
assertions about what people believe.



[Hammond]
Listen moron.... Hinduism is a MONOTHEISTIC religion with
a Triune God just like Xtianity (the "Trimurti"). the rest
of the demigods are what Xtainity calls "Angels" or
"Saints".
Xtianity + Islam +Judiasm +Hindii = 80% of the human
race. You're a lowbrow pedant who is only capable of
arguing pointless common knowlege trivia and playing world
games. I don't believe for a minute that you're a Phd in
theoretical Physics.
You've got nothing of interest to say, just another half
baked neer do well aggravated psycho who's too lazy to even
read my website much less my peer published papers.
And Pergamon Press is one of the world's premeir academic
publishers, not "vanity press", asshole.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================