Compton won the Nobel Prize in 1927 for his derivation of this effect.
It is light interacting with matter. The first interpretation is that
the high energy of an electromagentic wave is transfered to the
electron in the atom causing its energy transition and the high energy
wave as a result increases in wavelength and flies off in a different
direction. The inverse Compton effect is when the electron gives light
more energy. This is a borrowing of energy from light to matter and
matter to light.

The second interpretation of the Compton effect is that the atomic
electron absorbs the high energy electromagnetic wave undergoing
energy transition and emitting in a different direction the large
leftover energy in the form of a new high energy EM wave. The process
may repeat if the energy of light is high enough. The inverse Compton
effect in this interpretation would be light being absorbed and
reemitted at higher energy where the extra energy comes from the
electron.

I won one of two Nobel prizes in Physics 2008 for explaining the new
phenomenon of light interacting with free electrons collapsing their
wave functions temporarily. There is a period where the electron is
waveless after it has scattered light in the Two Slit experiment. This
is a waveless state of matter outside the atom.

I hypothesize that any exchange of energy from light to matter in the
atom collapses matter's wave function. Compton scattering and
"quantized" energy absorption of light is a point of wave function
collapse in the atom and is the source of a temporary waveless state
of matter there. The electron's wave function goes flat during energy
transition in the atom.

My theory is new form of Quantum Electro Dynamics or the extension of
the theory of the interaction between light and the electron. It
should be extended to the interaction of electromagnetic radiation
with all matter.


Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Apr 5, 2:41*pm, wrote:
Compton won the Nobel Prize in 1927 for his derivation of this effect.
It is light interacting with matter. The first interpretation is that
the high energy of an electromagentic wave is transfered to the
electron in the atom causing its energy transition and the high energy
wave as a result increases in wavelength and flies off in a different
direction. The inverse Compton effect is when the electron gives light
more energy. This is a borrowing of energy from light to matter and
matter to light.

The second interpretation of the Compton effect is that the atomic
electron absorbs the high energy electromagnetic wave undergoing
energy transition and emitting in a different direction the large
leftover energy in the form of a new high energy EM wave. The process
may repeat if the energy of light is high enough. The inverse Compton
effect in this interpretation would be light being absorbed and
reemitted at higher energy where the extra energy comes from the
electron.

I won one of two Nobel prizes in Physics 2008 for explaining the new
phenomenon of light interacting with free electrons collapsing their
wave functions temporarily. There is a period where the electron is
waveless after it has scattered light in the Two Slit experiment. This
is a waveless state of matter outside the atom.

The mentally ill are so amusing.


I hypothesize that any exchange of energy from light to matter in the
atom collapses matter's wave function. Compton scattering and
"quantized" energy absorption of light is a point of wave function
collapse in the atom and is the source of a temporary waveless state
of matter there. The electron's wave function goes flat during energy
transition in the atom.

My theory is new form of Quantum Electro Dynamics or the extension of
the theory of the interaction between light and the electron. It
should be extended to the interaction of electromagnetic radiation
with all matter.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Apr 5, 6:45 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 5, 2:41 pm, wrote:



Compton won the Nobel Prize in 1927 for his derivation of this effect.
It is light interacting with matter. The first interpretation is that
the high energy of an electromagentic wave is transfered to the
electron in the atom causing its energy transition and the high energy
wave as a result increases in wavelength and flies off in a different
direction. The inverse Compton effect is when the electron gives light
more energy. This is a borrowing of energy from light to matter and
matter to light.

The second interpretation of the Compton effect is that the atomic
electron absorbs the high energy electromagnetic wave undergoing
energy transition and emitting in a different direction the large
leftover energy in the form of a new high energy EM wave. The process
may repeat if the energy of light is high enough. The inverse Compton
effect in this interpretation would be light being absorbed and
reemitted at higher energy where the extra energy comes from the
electron.

I won one of two Nobel prizes in Physics 2008 for explaining the new
phenomenon of light interacting with free electrons collapsing their
wave functions temporarily. There is a period where the electron is
waveless after it has scattered light in the Two Slit experiment. This
is a waveless state of matter outside the atom.

The mentally ill are so amusing.

Maybe he is posting his message from another universe, one where he
the Noble Prize is given earlier in the year and where he won two
Nobel prizes. One for comedy and one for painting.

On Apr 5, 2:59*pm, Darwin123 wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:45 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:



On Apr 5, 2:41 pm, wrote:

Compton won the Nobel Prize in 1927 for his derivation of this effect.
It is light interacting with matter. The first interpretation is that
the high energy of an electromagentic wave is transfered to the
electron in the atom causing its energy transition and the high energy
wave as a result increases in wavelength and flies off in a different
direction. The inverse Compton effect is when the electron gives light
more energy. This is a borrowing of energy from light to matter and
matter to light.

The second interpretation of the Compton effect is that the atomic
electron absorbs the high energy electromagnetic wave undergoing
energy transition and emitting in a different direction the large
leftover energy in the form of a new high energy EM wave. The process
may repeat if the energy of light is high enough. The inverse Compton
effect in this interpretation would be light being absorbed and
reemitted at higher energy where the extra energy comes from the
electron.

I won one of two Nobel prizes in Physics 2008 for explaining the new
phenomenon of light interacting with free electrons collapsing their
wave functions temporarily. There is a period where the electron is
waveless after it has scattered light in the Two Slit experiment. This
is a waveless state of matter outside the atom.

The mentally ill are so amusing.

Maybe he is posting his message from another universe, one where he
the Noble Prize is given earlier in the year and where he won two
Nobel prizes. One for comedy and one for painting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The Compton effect and its reverse can be summerized as matter and
light transmitting energy from one to another.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

writes:

On Apr 5, 2:59=A0pm, Darwin123 wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:45 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 5, 2:41 pm, wrote:

I won one of two Nobel prizes in Physics 2008 for explaining the new
phenomenon of light interacting with free electrons collapsing their
wave functions temporarily. There is a period where the electron is
waveless after it has scattered light in the Two Slit experiment. This
is a waveless state of matter outside the atom.

The mentally ill are so amusing.

Maybe he is posting his message from another universe, one where he
the Noble Prize is given earlier in the year and where he won two
Nobel prizes. One for comedy and one for painting.

The Compton effect and its reverse can be summerized as matter and
light transmitting energy from one to another.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

That's nice.

Now tell us, is your other Nobel Prize really for painting or is it for
crayons?