On Mar 29, 11:13 am, "greysky" wrote:
"Marko Amnell" wrote in message

...



Does anyone understand these issues well enough that they
could explain how the physicists cited below would estimate
the chances of a tiny black hole forming, or a strangelet?

Problem is nobody knows enough physics to absolutely and finally say there
is *NO* chance of destroying the earth with this machine. If a small black
hole lasts long enough to feed on the walls of the LHC, it wont decay, but
grow. If a strangelet is formed and it is stable, the same. The basic
arguement for this not happening is that it already would have due to cosmic
ray collisions in the upper atmosphere - problem is, those cosmic rays are
hitting a target that is essentially standing still so the products are
still moving at high velocities away from us. With the LHC, you are going to
have two particles moving at equal velocities but in opposite directions.
The chances for products like mini black holes to form with zero velocity
with respect to the earth are therefor much higher. If this happens all the
observing scientists can do is **** bricks. That's why the LHC should not be
operated and I hope some nation finally comes forward and states that if it
is turned on it will be a decleration of war against the human race, and
then send jets over to bomb it into rubble. I am not an anti-science
luddite, it's just that I don't want to die in a horrible manner.... I feel
that those Cern Pecker-woods do not have the right to destroy us all.

Greysky

You mean the mutant incest foaming Semitic/Zionistic black hole likes
of rabbi Art Deco and company eats Earth. Figures, doesn't it.
.. - Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 29, 11:13 am, "greysky" wrote:
"Marko Amnell" wrote in message

...



Does anyone understand these issues well enough that they
could explain how the physicists cited below would estimate
the chances of a tiny black hole forming, or a strangelet?

Problem is nobody knows enough physics to absolutely and finally say there
is *NO* chance of destroying the earth with this machine. If a small black
hole lasts long enough to feed on the walls of the LHC, it wont decay, but
grow. If a strangelet is formed and it is stable, the same. The basic
arguement for this not happening is that it already would have due to cosmic
ray collisions in the upper atmosphere - problem is, those cosmic rays are
hitting a target that is essentially standing still so the products are
still moving at high velocities away from us. With the LHC, you are going to
have two particles moving at equal velocities but in opposite directions.
The chances for products like mini black holes to form with zero velocity
with respect to the earth are therefor much higher. If this happens all the
observing scientists can do is **** bricks. That's why the LHC should not be
operated and I hope some nation finally comes forward and states that if it
is turned on it will be a decleration of war against the human race, and
then send jets over to bomb it into rubble. I am not an anti-science
luddite, it's just that I don't want to die in a horrible manner.... I feel
that those Cern Pecker-woods do not have the right to destroy us all.

Greysky

You mean the mutant incest foaming Semitic/Zionistic black hole likes
of rabbi Art Deco and company eats Earth. Figures, doesn't it.

*ding*

. - Brad Guth

Still #1 inside the skulls of teh koøks.

--
"Classic erroneous presupposition."
-- David Tholen