Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

wrote:
Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Time as is viewed by this popular concept is relative. What we
experience, if we travel with the velocity, is a slow down but has time
truly slowed or only the perception?
Time is constant only our perceptions are changed?
Reality is perception?

On Mar 29, 11:31*pm, wrote:
Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have
outdone even yourself.

Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with
respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or
mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a
function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/
dt2, or dV/dt.
'
Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at
rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or
direction of motion.

Acceleration is a function of time. Time is not a function of
acceleration.

Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference
between dependent variables and independent variables.

Harry C.

On Mar 29, 8:30*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 29, 11:31*pm, wrote:

Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have
outdone even yourself.

Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with
respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or
mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a
function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/
dt2, or dV/dt.
'
Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at
rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or
direction of motion.

Acceleration is a function of time. *Time is not a function of
acceleration.

Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference
between dependent variables and independent variables.

Harry C.

Without acceleration first there is no motion.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Mar 30, 5:16*pm, wrote:
On Mar 29, 8:30*pm, " wrote:





On Mar 29, 11:31*pm, wrote:

Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have
outdone even yourself.

Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with
respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or
mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a
function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/
dt2, or dV/dt.
'
Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at
rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or
direction of motion.

Acceleration is a function of time. *Time is not a function of
acceleration.

Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference
between dependent variables and independent variables.

Harry C.

Without acceleration first there is no motion.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wrong again Mitch. Read Newton.

Harry C.

On Mar 30, 6:30 am, " wrote:
On Mar 29, 11:31 pm, wrote:

Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have
outdone even yourself.

Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with
respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or

only if S is a 3d vector

mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a
function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/
dt2, or dV/dt.

only if accl is constant

'
Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at
rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or
direction of motion.

Acceleration is a function of time. Time is not a function of
acceleration.

Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference
between dependent variables and independent variables.

Harry C.

On Mar 30, 3:00*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:16*pm, wrote:





On Mar 29, 8:30*pm, " wrote:

On Mar 29, 11:31*pm, wrote:

Acceleration slows time by creating motion. For every velocity up to
light there is a slower time rate given by the Gamma Factor.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, I generally ignore your silly posts, but this time you have
outdone even yourself.

Motion in essence is defined as dS/dt, the change in position with
respect to time, also termed velocity. It is what a physicist or
mathematician would describe and the first derivative of position as a
function of time. Accleration is mere the second derivitive or d2S/
dt2, or dV/dt.
'
Acceleration does not create motion except in the case where a body at
rest begins to move. Acceleration simply modifies the rate or
direction of motion.

Acceleration is a function of time. *Time is not a function of
acceleration.

Mitch, you my want to spend a few hours learning the difference
between dependent variables and independent variables.

Harry C.

Without acceleration first there is no motion.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wrong again Mitch. Read Newton.

Harry C.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Matter needs to be accelerated to be set into motion. Acceleration
comes first.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008