A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

EINSTEINIANA AS MUTUAL SYCOPHANCY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 29th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,053
Default EINSTEINIANA AS MUTUAL SYCOPHANCY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY6n8j4y7xw

Pentcho Valev

Ads
  #2  
Old March 30th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,053
Default EINSTEINIANA AS MUTUAL SYCOPHANCY

On Mar 29, 1:54*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY6n8j4y7xw


Yet string theorists, the silliest members of Einstein criminal cult,
are not sycophants of quantum gravity theorists and even hate them to
some extent:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2008/03/cr...versality.html
Motl: "I am going to explain, using Lee Smolin's new paper, why he is
a textbook example of a crank and what it means. The paper argues that
all theories in the world are equivalent to each other and encoded in
the formula "S=Tr(M^3)"."

The hatred is generated by texts like this one:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...ingtheory.html
Lee Smolin, September 2006: "Well, every string theory that's been
written down says the speed of light is universal. But other ideas
about quantum gravity predict the speed of light has actually
increased. And an experiment on the Gamma Ray Large Area Space
Telescope, launching next year, will check this. So I've said, look,
if the speed of light isn't universal, that disconfirms string theory.
But the string theorists say they could probably invent versions of
the theory that work either way. We'd have to change our notion of
what science is to accommodate this proposition. You just can't do
science on that basis."

Pentcho Valev

  #3  
Old April 1st 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,053
Default EINSTEINIANA AS MUTUAL SYCOPHANCY

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...ience.research
The Guardian, Thursday January 20 2005
"Edward Witten is so softly spoken that his voice sometimes threatens
to drift away completely. His desk is a jumble of papers and his
blackboard a mess of equations. But his hushed words come straight to
the point and are infused with understanding and passion. Witten's
quiet manner belies his status. In his role as de facto scientist-in-
chief of string theory, Witten, the Charles Simonyi professor of
mathematical physics at the Institute of Advanced Study (IAS) in
Princeton, is undoubtedly the heir to Albert Einstein's title of
greatest living physicist. If Einstein were alive today, he would
probably be a string theorist.....As personal opinions go, Witten's
make other scientists sit up and listen. His ideas in the development
of string theory are legendary. "There is no question of the
extraordinary quality of Witten's intellectual achievements," says
renowned physicist Roger Penrose in his latest book, The Road to
Reality. "Where Witten goes, it does not take long for the rest to
follow." Witten himself does not approve of the cult of
celebrity....Predictably, Witten is modest about his achievement.
"It's an exaggeration to say that I came up with M-theory," he says.
"We came up with bits and pieces but there's a long history behind
it." Wherever the credit lies, there is no doubt that M-theory took
the already bizarre world of string theory into even stranger
territory. Before M-theory, strings existed in a world with 10
dimensions. These included a dimension of time, the three familiar
space dimensions, as well as six extra dimensions, curled up so small
that they are invisible. M-theory demanded an extra dimension for
space, taking the total to 11......The future for the string theorists
looks bright but there are still some basic questions for physicists
to answer. The first is simply - what is the theory describing? "This
is unlike general relativity where Einstein laid out the principles
and then he derived the consequences," says Seiberg. "We are in the
very bizarre, unprecedented situation where we know how to derive some
of the consequences but we don't know what the fundamental principles
are."

Pentcho Valev

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EINSTEINIANA AS MUTUAL SYCOPHANCY Pentcho Valev Physics - General Discussion 2 April 1st 08 12:44 PM
EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END Pentcho Valev Physics - General Discussion 4 December 27th 07 10:27 PM
EINSTEINIANA: THE BEGINNING OF THE END Pentcho Valev The Theory of Relativity 4 December 27th 07 10:27 PM
Sycophancy Pentcho Valev The Theory of Relativity 1 July 9th 05 06:19 PM
sycophancy Pentcho Valev Physics - General Discussion 2 July 9th 05 11:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Ringtones - Internet Advertising - Guitar Lessons - CreditCards - Loans