Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities even though they
are part of theory.

Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Mar 18, 10:25 pm, wrote:
Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities even though they
are part of theory.

Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Could be true as far as I know. There are certain to be some things
that are simply theoretical constructs and have no actual reality to
them.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Can't you only win the Nobel prize once in your lifetime and hasn't
the committee not chosen a winner for this year yet?

On Mar 18, 9:25*pm, wrote:
Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity

Nope, not at all.

therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities

Whew, close one, then.

even though they
are part of theory.

Nonsense. The model might have a singularity, but the model is a
model. The model is not the thing itself.


Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Could be. But there is a limit to fermi pressure. We certainly have
evidence for visible things orbiting bodies that are too massive to be
supported by fermi pressure.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I wonder if the date will magically switch to 2009 after this year's
awards go out.

On Mar 18, 9:36*pm, eratosthenes wrote:


Can't you only win the Nobel prize once in your lifetime and hasn't
the committee not chosen a winner for this year yet?

John Bardeen won the prize for physics twice, 16 years apart.
Marie Curie won two prizes, for physics and chemistry, 8 years apart.
Linus Pauling won two prizes, for chemistry and peace, 8 years apart.
Frederick Sanger won the prize for chemistry twice, 22 years apart.

Mitch woke up one day this year with his underpants twisted round his
head twice, and got confused about the signficance of that event.

PD

eratosthenes wrote:
wrote:
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Can't you only win the Nobel prize once in your lifetime

I can't seem to win it even once, but some have multiple Nobel
prizes. Linus Pauling has two unshared Nobels.

and hasn't
the committee not chosen a winner for this year yet?

True.


--
--Bryan

On Mar 18, 6:43*pm, PD wrote:
On Mar 18, 9:25*pm, wrote:

Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity

Nope, not at all.

What about singularity?

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008


therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities

Whew, close one, then.

even though they
are part of theory.

Nonsense. The model might have a singularity, but the model is a
model. The model is not the thing itself.



Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Could be. But there is a limit to fermi pressure. We certainly have
evidence for visible things orbiting bodies that are too massive to be
supported by fermi pressure.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I wonder if the date will magically switch to 2009 after this year's
awards go out.

"Bryan Olson" wrote in message
. net...
eratosthenes wrote:
wrote:
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Can't you only win the Nobel prize once in your lifetime

I can't seem to win it even once, but some have multiple Nobel
prizes. Linus Pauling has two unshared Nobels.

and hasn't
the committee not chosen a winner for this year yet?

Consider yourself lucky. That nobel committiee are just a bunch of pests,
that's all. Every year, they start calling me around March, begging me to
'do the right thing' this year. I keep screamiing "stop pestering me!" into
the phone as I rudely hang up on them - oh wait, that's the IRS, not the
Swedes......


True.


--
--Bryan

On Mar 18, 10:25*pm, wrote:
Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities even though they
are part of theory.

Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I wasn't aware that toads like you were even allowed to post to the
mensa newsgroup.

On Mar 18, 7:25 pm, wrote:
Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities even though they
are part of theory.

Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I can't see your name on the Nobel list. Where is it?

--
Jan Bielawski

On Mar 18, 10:22*pm, wrote:
On Mar 18, 6:43*pm, PD wrote:

On Mar 18, 9:25*pm, wrote:

Acceleration goes infinite in black hole gravity

Nope, not at all.

What about singularity?

No, the acceleration is not infinite when it hits the singularity. Are
you simply assuming that *everything* is infinite at singularities?


Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008





therefor they can not
exist. There can be no infinite physical quantities

Whew, close one, then.

even though they
are part of theory.

Nonsense. The model might have a singularity, but the model is a
model. The model is not the thing itself.

Supermasssive neutron stars are what we are seeing in space.

Could be. But there is a limit to fermi pressure. We certainly have
evidence for visible things orbiting bodies that are too massive to be
supported by fermi pressure.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I wonder if the date will magically switch to 2009 after this year's
awards go out.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -