A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 11th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,507
Default SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY?

http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm
Stephen Hawking: "I take the positivist viewpoint that a physical
theory is just a mathematical model and that it is meaningless to ask
whether it corresponds to reality. All that one can ask is that its
predictions should be in agreement with observation."

Einstein's theory predicts that the gravitational redshift factor is
1+V/c^2 and the Pound-Rebka experiment does confirm this prediction.
Is everything OK? See:

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Some logical aspects of the problem are discussed he

http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf

Pentcho Valev

Ads
  #2  
Old March 12th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo
xxein[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 422
Default SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY?

On Mar 11, 12:55*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm
Stephen Hawking: "I take the positivist viewpoint that a physical
theory is just a mathematical model and that it is meaningless to ask
whether it corresponds to reality. All that one can ask is that its
predictions should be in agreement with observation."


xxein: Hawking is acting like a sore loser.

REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Some logical aspects of the problem are discussed he

http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf

Pentcho Valev


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY? Pentcho Valev Physics - General Discussion 1 March 12th 08 01:48 AM
Cinema projector theory of reality Mr Pixie Physics - General (alternative forum) 8 July 16th 05 10:48 AM
new theory of physics and reality - updated Gary Forbat Physics - New Theories 0 June 20th 04 06:00 AM
what do the columns and rows of the metric correspond to? 'Fritz' Frederick Reitz The Theory of Relativity 0 November 16th 03 06:14 PM
Friendly reminder that theory isn't reality Richard The Theory of Relativity 8 November 8th 03 04:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Wester Union - Loans - Mortgage - Quick Collect - Bad Credit Mortgages