![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: correspond, reality, should, theory |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm
Stephen Hawking: "I take the positivist viewpoint that a physical theory is just a mathematical model and that it is meaningless to ask whether it corresponds to reality. All that one can ask is that its predictions should be in agreement with observation." Einstein's theory predicts that the gravitational redshift factor is 1+V/c^2 and the Pound-Rebka experiment does confirm this prediction. Is everything OK? See: http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in 1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity. One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FACTOR." Some logical aspects of the problem are discussed he http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf Pentcho Valev |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 11, 12:55*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm Stephen Hawking: "I take the positivist viewpoint that a physical theory is just a mathematical model and that it is meaningless to ask whether it corresponds to reality. All that one can ask is that its predictions should be in agreement with observation." xxein: Hawking is acting like a sore loser. REDSHIFT FACTOR." Some logical aspects of the problem are discussed he http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf Pentcho Valev |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY? | Pentcho Valev | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | March 12th 08 01:48 AM |
| Cinema projector theory of reality | Mr Pixie | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 8 | July 16th 05 10:48 AM |
| new theory of physics and reality - updated | Gary Forbat | Physics - New Theories | 0 | June 20th 04 06:00 AM |
| what do the columns and rows of the metric correspond to? | 'Fritz' Frederick Reitz | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | November 16th 03 06:14 PM |
| Friendly reminder that theory isn't reality | Richard | The Theory of Relativity | 8 | November 8th 03 04:06 AM |