On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:01:51 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:09:09 -0500, "William Hayes"

wrote:
Einstein's Relativity is easy to understand if one has the IQ of a
parrot and a gullibility index 0.95.

...and what have you contributed other than lies and bull****, Ralph?

I personally like the "Einstein's Relativity is easy to understand if one
has the IQ of a parrot and a gullibility index 0.95."; for an
astrophysicist, I thought it was midly humorous.
For the rest of it, I'm still working on the part where using light to see
things go toward faster than light and beyond is .... 'smart' ?
GR be frack'd, full speed ahead... or something effulently relevent like
that.

If you are an astrophysicist you should wake up to the fact that all
starlight
DOES NOT move towards little planet Earth at precisely c.

Yeah, stuff with gravity gets in the way. That'll slow a photon down a bit.

Almost all light in the universe is in transit.
Apparently Einstein's fairies have adjusted its speed so that it all travels
towards little planet Earth at precisely c, no matter what the source was
doing.
....and yes, Gravity fields DO change its speed.




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

.....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians....

On Mar 31, 2:57*pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:18:40 -0700 (PDT), stone wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:27 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:09:49 -0700 (PDT), tici viracocha
wrote:

only if you keep constant frequency, thanks

The absolute frequency of any oscillator is not affected by the movement of any
observer.

electron or em oscillator?

if you move fast they say that tha electron oscillate slower,
seen from outside

while for em thay say is unchanged but not dependent

im not sure is quite tha same

What an oscillator does is not affected by anyone watching it.

Yet the oscillator is where your eyes are.

data are

data are

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:51:20 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C."
wrote:

On Mar 31, 2:57*pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:18:40 -0700 (PDT), stone wrote:

im not sure is quite tha same

What an oscillator does is not affected by anyone watching it.

Yet the oscillator is where your eyes are.

Maybe you need to see an optometrist.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

.....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians....

On Apr 5, 4:14*pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:51:20 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C."
wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:57*pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:18:40 -0700 (PDT), stone wrote:
im not sure is quite tha same

What an oscillator does is not affected by anyone watching it.

Yet the oscillator is where your eyes are.

Maybe you need to see an optometrist.

Your oneliners don't do away the explanations I gave you.