|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: controlled, laboratory, never, relativity, works |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
March 4th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
my instinct force my intuition to
force me ta explain life moon landing forty years ago for people who dont know that yet succinctly, relativity easily could explain by predicting 1. tha necessary power supply needed by transmitting apparatus 2. tha consistency, weight and size tha batteries conversely 3. tha necessary area of tha solar cells 4. tha necessary 5m diameter parabolic antenna and an image of it 5. neglect the size of tha transmitting apparatus and tha required technicians just shoe a photo of tha 5m diameter antenna they used on moon, and the solar cells, in order for these people to bulive, becus thay dont really wan ta bulive from me 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
March 5th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
On Mar 4, 2:43*pm, galapagos wrote:
my instinct force my intuition to force me ta explain life moon landing forty years ago for people who dont know that yet succinctly, relativity easily could explain by predicting 1. tha necessary power supply needed by transmitting apparatus 2. tha consistency, weight and size tha batteries conversely 3. tha necessary area of *tha solar cells 4. tha necessary 5m diameter parabolic antenna and an image of it 5. neglect the size of tha transmitting apparatus and tha required technicians just shoe a photo of tha 5m diameter antenna they used on moon, and the solar cells, in order for these people to bulive, becus thay dont really wan ta bulive from me xxein: But you haven't shown proof of anything that contradicts the beliefs and dogmas.
|
|
#3
March 5th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
"galapagos" wrote in message
... my instinct force my intuition to force me ta explain life moon landing forty years ago for people who dont know that yet succinctly, relativity easily could explain by predicting 1. tha necessary power supply needed by transmitting apparatus 2. tha consistency, weight and size tha batteries conversely 3. tha necessary area of tha solar cells 4. tha necessary 5m diameter parabolic antenna and an image of it 5. neglect the size of tha transmitting apparatus and tha required technicians just shoe a photo of tha 5m diameter antenna they used on moon, and the solar cells, in order for these people to bulive, becus thay dont really wan ta bulive from me WTF does your post have to do with its subject title.
|
|
#4
March 5th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
|
|
#5
March 7th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
On Mar 5, 2:16 am, xxein wrote:
On Mar 4, 2:43 pm, galapagos wrote: my instinct force my intuition to force me ta explain life moon landing forty years ago for people who dont know that yet succinctly, relativity easily could explain by predicting 1. tha necessary power supply needed by transmitting apparatus 2. tha consistency, weight and size tha batteries conversely 3. tha necessary area of tha solar cells 4. tha necessary 5m diameter parabolic antenna and an image of it 5. neglect the size of tha transmitting apparatus and tha required technicians just shoe a photo of tha 5m diameter antenna they used on moon, and the solar cells, in order for these people to bulive, becus thay dont really wan ta bulive from me xxein: But you haven't shown proof of anything that contradicts the beliefs and dogmas. you are wrong, thanks he is supposedly a buliver i am a buliver too, and factually everybody is a buliver, includin you thats tha hole poing we are bulivers
|
|
#6
March 7th 08
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
why relativity in controlled laboratory never works?
On Mar 5, 2:28 am, "Artful" wrote:
"galapagos" wrote in message ... my instinct force my intuition to force me ta explain life moon landing forty years ago for people who dont know that yet succinctly, relativity easily could explain by predicting 1. tha necessary power supply needed by transmitting apparatus 2. tha consistency, weight and size tha batteries conversely 3. tha necessary area of tha solar cells 4. tha necessary 5m diameter parabolic antenna and an image of it 5. neglect the size of tha transmitting apparatus and tha required technicians just shoe a photo of tha 5m diameter antenna they used on moon, and the solar cells, in order for these people to bulive, becus thay dont really wan ta bulive from me WTF does your post have to do with its subject title. fartful, you said somthen?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nature, Nurture or Laboratory? | Dan Ryan | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 0 | December 25th 07 10:31 PM |
| Tracer fire in the laboratory | Androcles | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | October 14th 07 11:40 AM |
| Tracer fire in the laboratory | Androcles | The Theory of Relativity | 4 | October 14th 07 11:40 AM |
| Laboratory method to produce Na | max | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | October 30th 03 08:59 AM |
Linear Mode
