A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

SOS to J. R. Yablon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 29th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
George Hammond
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,977
Default SOS to J. R. Yablon

Dear Professor Yablon,
I am Mr. George Hammond. I feel more comfortable
addressing you as professor Yablon if you don't mind. .
I am an M.S. in Physics and can barely read your papers.
However I was alerted by your statement:
We don't observe free magnetic monopoles because
they are quarks and we don’t observe free quarks either.
There is no need to explain this as I don't know enough
Physics to discuss it but obviously it has intriguing face
validity.
Rather, I am an expert on genius itself, being a
"psychological physicist", and your statement identifies you
as a genius.
To get to my point, the goal of "psychological physics"
is to explain God, and I claim to have achieved success.
I tried professor Chris Isham (Theoretical Physics Group
and Dean of Science, Imperial College, London) but all he
did was whine about his 95 year old mother dying in a
nursing home, complain bitterly about his workload and
perfunctorily repeat a litany of "So you have not proved
God" over and over again.
Judging from your publications and your photograph I have
every confidence that you could, and would, squash like a
bug any sort of scientific tomfoolery, incompetence or
nonsense and could easily assess my elementary physics
discovery in 5 MINUTES FLAT !
I presume that you have no interest in the subject of
"God" per se, and neither do I, actually. However, there
are certain scientific discoveries that are vital to us all,
and this happens to be one of them. I have no intention of
cluttering your discussion group with this, but I was hoping
that you would, as a public service gesture, make a quick
off the cuff scientific assessment of it.
What I have discovered is that the Factor Analytic
structure of Psychometrics is CAUSALLY identical to the
tensor (4x4 matrix) structure of Linearized Gravity in
Relativity. In short, that the phenomenon of "God" so
called, is simply a curvature of subjective spacetime wch.
obeys the Einstein Field Equations (EFE). In practical
terms this means that we see a "curved version" of objective
reality, and that the degree of curvature varies from person
to person. The entire world looks BIGGER and FASTER than it
really is- to all of us, and this is the scientific
explanation of the phenomenon of God. Finally, the source
term in the EFE describing this phenomenon is the well known
Secular Trend in human growth... it is a simple percent
"brain growth" that causes the curvature, and hence causes
the classical God of the Bible. In short, it is a proof
that there a God, and that God can be, and has been,
measured to 3 significant figures!
OK, that's it, and as you can see this "proof of God"
entails nothing more than undergraduate level General
Relativity and Linear Algebra.... certainly trivial to a
Relativity physicist like yourself. But, as you know,
towing the barge of religion into the modern scientific age
is of vast importance socially, and I am hopeful that
someone like you could spare a FEW MINUTES of your time to
pro bono assist with the care and management of the huddled
masses of our society.
Sincerely yours,
George Hammond, M.S. Physics
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================

Ads
  #2  
Old February 29th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.sci.physics
John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 475
Default SOS to J. R. Yablon


"George Hammond" wrote in message
...


GEORGE!!!!!!!!!!
Spend a few weeks in "the ward" again!?!?!?!


Dear Professor Yablon,
I am Mr. George Hammond. I feel more comfortable
addressing you as professor Yablon if you don't mind. .
I am an M.S. in Physics and can barely read your papers.
However I was alerted by your statement:
We don't observe free magnetic monopoles because
they are quarks and we don't observe free quarks either.
There is no need to explain this as I don't know enough
Physics to discuss it but obviously it has intriguing face
validity.
Rather, I am an expert on genius itself, being a
"psychological physicist", and your statement identifies you
as a genius.


What are the CVs you have to show your education and expertise in these
INVENTED "fields"?
You are barely an expert in taking a **** without help.
You certainly know nothing about "genius".


To get to my point, the goal of "psychological physics"
is to explain God, and I claim to have achieved success.


Psychological physics is NOT an education course ......... it's just a
meaningless phrase you invented, then bellowed.


I tried professor Chris Isham (Theoretical Physics Group
and Dean of Science, Imperial College, London) but all he
did was whine about his 95 year old mother dying in a
nursing home, complain bitterly about his workload and
perfunctorily repeat a litany of "So you have not proved
God" over and over again.


Ahhh..... a few personal smears, and then minimizing the fact that Isham
flushed your crap - just like everyone else has.

Judging from your publications and your photograph I have
every confidence that you could, and would, squash like a
bug any sort of scientific tomfoolery, incompetence or
nonsense and could easily assess my elementary physics
discovery in 5 MINUTES FLAT !


And flush it as meaningless crap ... in ONE!


I presume that you have no interest in the subject of
"God" per se, and neither do I, actually.


Bwahahaaaaaaa.......

However, there
are certain scientific discoveries that are vital to us all,
and this happens to be one of them. I have no intention of
cluttering your discussion group with this, but I was hoping
that you would, as a public service gesture, make a quick
off the cuff scientific assessment of it.


That's all you've EVER done; clutter up discussion groups with your CRAP!


What I have discovered is that the Factor Analytic
structure of Psychometrics is CAUSALLY identical to the
tensor (4x4 matrix) structure of Linearized Gravity in
Relativity. In short, that the phenomenon of "God" so
called, is simply a curvature of subjective spacetime wch.
obeys the Einstein Field Equations (EFE). In practical
terms this means that we see a "curved version" of objective
reality, and that the degree of curvature varies from person
to person. The entire world looks BIGGER and FASTER than it
really is- to all of us, and this is the scientific
explanation of the phenomenon of God. Finally, the source
term in the EFE describing this phenomenon is the well known
Secular Trend in human growth... it is a simple percent
"brain growth" that causes the curvature, and hence causes
the classical God of the Bible. In short, it is a proof
that there a God, and that God can be, and has been,
measured to 3 significant figures!
OK, that's it, and as you can see this "proof of God"
entails nothing more than undergraduate level General
Relativity and Linear Algebra.... certainly trivial to a
Relativity physicist like yourself. But, as you know,
towing the barge of religion into the modern scientific age
is of vast importance socially, and I am hopeful that
someone like you could spare a FEW MINUTES of your time to
pro bono assist with the care and management of the huddled
masses of our society.
Sincerely yours,
George Hammond, M.S. Physics


You will be a good boy, for a change, and honestly tell us when he shoves
you back into your psycho-hole.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SOS to J. R. Yablon George Hammond Physics - General Discussion 1 February 29th 08 06:31 AM
New Paper on Magnetic Monopoles by J.Yablon! andy Particle Physics 0 September 6th 05 12:32 PM
Yablon Doff and Nattale Al.Rivero@gmail.com Current Physics Research (Moderated) 6 August 20th 05 01:09 PM
Yablon and De Vries. Alejandro Current Physics Research (Moderated) 4 March 7th 05 10:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Secured Loans - Teen Chat - Myspace Comments - Mortgage Calculator - Job Listing