On Feb 24, 8:39 pm, Bryan Olson wrote:

You post under an alias; no one will hold you responsible for
what you've dumped here.

Even if you post under your real name or give out your social security
number, no one will hold you responsible for anything you choose to
barf up in these newsgroups. So, what are you bitching about how
aliases are used?

On Feb 24, 9:10 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:



On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely

tha not close enuff

russia, japan and other advanced sciencists been
there and saw everithing

not evertthing

why they dont want to release tha closeups of
tha mo0n landing missions,

cuz they no have 'em

Well, Mr. Poe, after you have been checkmated by the radiation
analysis from the solar wind that the deep space radiation beyond the
Van Allen Belts is actually very deadly indeed, you still resort to
blindly believe in that manned moon-landing hoax.

How quickly you forget that the last time you brought these idiotic
assertions up, I smacked them down. Too bad you prefer your delusions
over actual spacecraft data.


"One small lie for a man, one giant hoax for mankind."

Koobee Wublee wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:

You post under an alias; no one will hold you responsible for
what you've dumped here.

Even if you post under your real name or give out your social security
number, no one will hold you responsible for anything you choose to
barf up in these newsgroups. So, what are you bitching about how
aliases are used?

Sure know not to expect much from a post showing "Koobee
Wublee" as the author.


--
--Bryan

caliber wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:51 am, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:07 pm, caliber wrote:



On Feb 23, 11:58 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:54 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:31 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:08 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely
tha not close enuff
giv me a break,
you can see cars and shoes from space
throo google earth,
No you can't, not from space.
are you saying that tha earth we see from
google is not pictures taken from space?
Not if it is showing "cars and shoes".
if you say you cant see cars and walking
people thro google earth you are a blind
man or a liar
and if you register, they give you even higher
resolution
but anyhow, they pretend getting images
of objects on earth from satelites with
cm resolution
Where do they pretend that? Can you link me to
an image with cm resolution, that claims it is
from space?
you can link yourself many places, they say not me
No they don't.

There, that was easy to disprove.

Guess how you could prove me wrong?

fine, tell me than what are thay doing in space
all years long if not watching earth or somthin
also, what is tha highest resolution do you
think they can get
Commercially? A meter perhaps. I was reading a web
page today that offered resolution down to 3 inches
(7.5 cm) but that was from aircraft.

- Randy

you are even more wrong now than you been before

thanks

they imposibly can have so many aircrafts to
so many walking people

now, if you clearly can see a car from space,
than a lunar base station from a satellite orbiting
tha moon will have even higher resolution

becus tha satellites orbit tha moon closer to
tha moon than they orbit tha earth

tha moon has lower gravity fool

so tha moon resolution should be 10 times higher


http://tinyurl.com/2c4eof
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches...os_010427.html
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

Koobee Wublee wrote:
Randy Poe wrote:
caliber wrote:

many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely
tha not close enuff

russia, japan and other advanced sciencists been
there and saw everithing

not evertthing

why they dont want to release tha closeups of
tha mo0n landing missions,

cuz they no have 'em

Well, Mr. Poe, after you have been checkmated by the radiation
analysis from the solar wind that the deep space radiation beyond the
Van Allen Belts is actually very deadly indeed, you still resort to
blindly believe in that manned moon-landing hoax.

The guy that posts as "Koobee Wublee" is both a relativity denier
and an Apollo-project denier. The checkmate he refers to happened
in his head.

Of course none of these kooks are going to show that the photos
at issue in this thread actually exist. They'll just pretend to
know what they do not, as usual.

"One small lie for a man, one giant hoax for mankind."

Go girl!

Armstrong may have blown his line; he gets a pass on that. He
could have said, "holly s*** I'm on the f***ing Moon!!!," and
they sill would've been immortal words under the circumstances.


--
--Bryan

Supertroll Eric Gisse trolled:

How quickly you forget that the last time you brought these idiotic
assertions up, I smacked them down. Too bad you prefer your delusions
over actual spacecraft data.

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...tivity/search?
group=sci.physics.relativity&q=Eric+gisse+idiot&qt _g=Search+this+group

2090 hits only on sci.physics.relativity

--
Dono is concubine Lady Chacha

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yodo-Dono

On Feb 25, 1:10 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:



On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely

tha not close enuff

russia, japan and other advanced sciencists been
there and saw everithing

not evertthing

why they dont want to release tha closeups of
tha mo0n landing missions,

cuz they no have 'em

Well, Mr. Poe, after you have been checkmated by the radiation
analysis from the solar wind that the deep space radiation beyond the
Van Allen Belts is actually very deadly indeed, you still resort to
blindly believe in that manned moon-landing hoax.

As I recall, this "analysis" is that because 10-year
deep-space missions are rad-hardened to X rads, then
1-week missions must also experience X rads, right?
Since 10 years and 1 week are the same thing.

- Randy

On Feb 25, 11:18 am, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote:
caliber wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:51 am, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:07 pm, caliber wrote:

On Feb 23, 11:58 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:54 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:31 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:08 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely
tha not close enuff
giv me a break,
you can see cars and shoes from space
throo google earth,
No you can't, not from space.
are you saying that tha earth we see from
google is not pictures taken from space?
Not if it is showing "cars and shoes".
if you say you cant see cars and walking
people thro google earth you are a blind
man or a liar
and if you register, they give you even higher
resolution
but anyhow, they pretend getting images
of objects on earth from satelites with
cm resolution
Where do they pretend that? Can you link me to
an image with cm resolution, that claims it is
from space?
you can link yourself many places, they say not me
No they don't.

There, that was easy to disprove.

Guess how you could prove me wrong?

fine, tell me than what are thay doing in space
all years long if not watching earth or somthin
also, what is tha highest resolution do you
think they can get
Commercially? A meter perhaps. I was reading a web
page today that offered resolution down to 3 inches
(7.5 cm) but that was from aircraft.

- Randy

you are even more wrong now than you been before

thanks

they imposibly can have so many aircrafts to
so many walking people

now, if you clearly can see a car from space,
than a lunar base station from a satellite orbiting
tha moon will have even higher resolution

becus tha satellites orbit tha moon closer to
tha moon than they orbit tha earth

tha moon has lower gravity fool

so tha moon resolution should be 10 times higher

http://tinyurl.com/2c4eofhttp://www....lunar_orbiter/

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

finally a nice answer, thanks

but still im not confinced,

tha image is at best 400x300 pixels, and easy to fake

even my litle sister has a camera with better resolution

On Feb 25, 8:18 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:10 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:



On Feb 23, 1:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:

On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely

tha not close enuff

russia, japan and other advanced sciencists been
there and saw everithing

not evertthing

why they dont want to release tha closeups of
tha mo0n landing missions,

cuz they no have 'em

Well, Mr. Poe, after you have been checkmated by the radiation
analysis from the solar wind that the deep space radiation beyond the
Van Allen Belts is actually very deadly indeed, you still resort to
blindly believe in that manned moon-landing hoax.

How quickly you forget that the last time you brought these idiotic
assertions up, I smacked them down. Too bad you prefer your delusions
over actual spacecraft data.

tha only reason you insult people is becus
you dont even have a bachelor diploma in
electronic engineer

tha only competent answer was given here by
mister poul b andersen

whay cant you be like mister poul?




"One small lie for a man, one giant hoax for mankind."

tantal skrev:
On Feb 25, 11:18 am, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote:
caliber wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:51 am, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:07 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:58 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:54 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:31 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:08 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely
tha not close enuff
giv me a break,
you can see cars and shoes from space
throo google earth,
No you can't, not from space.
are you saying that tha earth we see from
google is not pictures taken from space?
Not if it is showing "cars and shoes".
if you say you cant see cars and walking
people thro google earth you are a blind
man or a liar
and if you register, they give you even higher
resolution
but anyhow, they pretend getting images
of objects on earth from satelites with
cm resolution
Where do they pretend that? Can you link me to
an image with cm resolution, that claims it is
from space?
you can link yourself many places, they say not me
No they don't.
There, that was easy to disprove.
Guess how you could prove me wrong?
fine, tell me than what are thay doing in space
all years long if not watching earth or somthin
also, what is tha highest resolution do you
think they can get
Commercially? A meter perhaps. I was reading a web
page today that offered resolution down to 3 inches
(7.5 cm) but that was from aircraft.
- Randy
you are even more wrong now than you been before
thanks
they imposibly can have so many aircrafts to
so many walking people
now, if you clearly can see a car from space,
than a lunar base station from a satellite orbiting
tha moon will have even higher resolution
becus tha satellites orbit tha moon closer to
tha moon than they orbit tha earth
tha moon has lower gravity fool
so tha moon resolution should be 10 times higher
http://tinyurl.com/2c4eofhttp://www....lunar_orbiter/

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

finally a nice answer, thanks

but still im not confinced,

tha image is at best 400x300 pixels, and easy to fake

even my litle sister has a camera with better resolution

Any image can be faked.
If you are one of those cranks who believe NASA is faking its images,
nothing can convince you about the opposite.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/