![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: change, light, speed |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
-- This message is brought to you by Androcles http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... | Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: | On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:13:55 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" | wrote: | | According to SR, if you travel with a constant acceleration of 1 c per year | (about 1g), turning the direction halfway, you can travel to a star 10 LY away | in 4.9 years. If you travel with a constant acceleration of 2 c per year (about 2g), | you can do it in 3.1 years. | | According to SR, you can go anywhere in the visible universe in a lifetime, | if you could accelerate at 1 g indefinitely. | | I'm accelerating at 1 g right now. Am I going anywhere in the universe? | | Interesting to see that you finally have realized | that you are accelerating at 1 g right now. | You are learning! :-) Applying a 1 g force that is opposed by a chair under Henri's arse means Henri is increasing his speed ? Henri is an idiot and so are you for encouraging him. |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:24:27 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote: "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message .. . On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:22:00 -0500, "William Hayes" "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:31:26 -0500, "William Hayes" Subject water to an emf pulse and water burns, as in acts like hydrogen and oxygen would if you seperated the atoms and lit a match to the hydrogen with the oxygen present. Endless round of water burning, creating a vapor, condensing, collected, burnt again..... over and over and purpetual motion machine.... using water, alternator to run the emf pulse, and a freakaziod engine to burn the water, keep the vapor in, condense the vapor back to water, collect it to a tank, and then cycle again. Slap nine of these critters to a Ship, fly to Mars in 3 days (not 8 months). Still haven't worked out the landing thing, yet. Bouncing around in balloons is out of the question. Only cranks invent perpetual motion like this. Comes from years of cranking out flyable stuff to a bunch of government management personel at NASA who hate to take 'Impossible' as an answer. Too Many years of cranking, not enough yaers of teaching theory and watching the planet pass me by .... True, the freakaziod engine doesn't keep the vapor in, tosses it out like hot gas. Been trying compressed hydrogen and oxygen for the most part. Gemini, Apollo .... Just recently got into this water thing with an emf pulse, about the only way to tell one has flown by is to look up and see a pulsed contrail. Oh, go ahead, look up and tell me you haven't seen a pulsed contrail overhead... there were enough nutcases on this NG before you turned up. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm .....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vacuum and Light quanta.
All stars and planets move into the Outer space without friction. Therefore Newton and Huygens were sure that the Cosmic space, Aether /Vacuum was an empty space. In that time Newton gave preference to corpuscular light theory and Huygens to the waves theory. But later A.J. Fresnel and Th. Young discovered that light was transverse waves. And the transverse waves can propagate only in the firm and spring space as the steel. Can Aether/ Vacuum be empty and steel at the same time? Many theories were written to explain this problem. All of them are covered with dust and maybe only historians of science remember them. Now somebody wrote: " Maybe the problem of transverse waves in Aether is possible to solve in another way. Perhaps it is necessary to explain not the Aether but how light works." My answer on the question:" How does Light quantum work?" 1. Light quantum can travel with constant speed c=1. and then we call it Photon. 2. Light quantum can work with speed c1. and then we call it Electron. Einstein's SRT describes this process. 3. Light quantum can stop its moving and take a rest c= 0 and then we call it Anti matter. 4. Is my interpretation correct ? Yes. It is correct. Why? Because when Electron interacts with Vacuum we also call it Anti matter 5. If you doubt in my rightness, ask yourself : What does " The Law of conservation and transformation of energy" mean according to one single Light quanta ? ================.. The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ' Existence', 'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' is hidden in the "Theory of Light quanta". ==========.. Best wishes. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
-- This message is brought to you by Androcles http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ "socratus" wrote in message ... | Vacuum and Light quanta. | | All stars and planets move into the Outer space without | friction. Therefore Newton and Huygens were sure that | the Cosmic space, Aether /Vacuum was an empty space. | In that time Newton gave preference to corpuscular | light theory and Huygens to the waves theory. | But later A.J. Fresnel and Th. Young discovered that | light was transverse waves. And the transverse waves can | propagate only in the firm and spring space as the steel. | Can Aether/ Vacuum be empty and steel at the same time? | Many theories were written to explain this problem. All of | them are covered with dust and maybe only historians of | science remember them. | Now somebody wrote: | " Maybe the problem of transverse waves in Aether is | possible to solve in another way. Perhaps it is | necessary to explain not the Aether but how light works." | My answer on the question:" How does Light quantum work?" Oh, you want to rant... | 1. | Light quantum can travel with constant speed c=1. | and then we call it Photon. That's a rant. | 2. | Light quantum can work with speed c1. | and then we call it Electron. | Einstein's SRT describes this process. That's a rant, you know nothing about Einstein's SRT. | 3. | Light quantum can stop its moving and take | a rest c= 0 and then we call it Anti matter. That's a rant | 4. | Is my interpretation correct ? No. It contains nothing of interest, explains nothing. This is correct: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/AC.htm |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:38:15 +0100, "Androcles"
wrote: Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm .....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm ....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... Any engineers or mathematicians list you among their teachers? If not, try not to be too depressed. Sure, abject failure in your specialty must hurt, but others have suffered somewhat similar disappointments, then managed to turn their lives in more productive directions. You can change, if you really try. -- --Bryan |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:39:45 GMT, Bryan Olson wrote:
Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm ....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... Any engineers or mathematicians list you among their teachers? If not, try not to be too depressed. Sure, abject failure in your specialty must hurt, but others have suffered somewhat similar disappointments, then managed to turn their lives in more productive directions. You can change, if you really try. Some of them are pretty dumb, I must admit. ..very hard to educate.... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm .....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:24:27 -0500, "William Hayes" wrote: "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message . .. On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:22:00 -0500, "William Hayes" "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message m... On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:31:26 -0500, "William Hayes" Subject water to an emf pulse and water burns, as in acts like hydrogen and oxygen would if you seperated the atoms and lit a match to the hydrogen with the oxygen present. Endless round of water burning, creating a vapor, condensing, collected, burnt again..... over and over and purpetual motion machine.... using water, alternator to run the emf pulse, and a freakaziod engine to burn the water, keep the vapor in, condense the vapor back to water, collect it to a tank, and then cycle again. Slap nine of these critters to a Ship, fly to Mars in 3 days (not 8 months). Still haven't worked out the landing thing, yet. Bouncing around in balloons is out of the question. Only cranks invent perpetual motion like this. Comes from years of cranking out flyable stuff to a bunch of government management personel at NASA who hate to take 'Impossible' as an answer. Too Many years of cranking, not enough yaers of teaching theory and watching the planet pass me by .... True, the freakaziod engine doesn't keep the vapor in, tosses it out like hot gas. Been trying compressed hydrogen and oxygen for the most part. Gemini, Apollo .... Just recently got into this water thing with an emf pulse, about the only way to tell one has flown by is to look up and see a pulsed contrail. Oh, go ahead, look up and tell me you haven't seen a pulsed contrail overhead... there were enough nutcases on this NG before you turned up. I've been here awhile, Henri. Sometimes posting. Sometimes reading, in between cranking out projects. And true, Henri, we ddidn't have enough Nut Cases before you should up. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:05:24 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote: "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message .. . On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:24:27 -0500, "William Hayes" Just recently got into this water thing with an emf pulse, about the only way to tell one has flown by is to look up and see a pulsed contrail. Oh, go ahead, look up and tell me you haven't seen a pulsed contrail overhead... there were enough nutcases on this NG before you turned up. I've been here awhile, Henri. Sometimes posting. Sometimes reading, in between cranking out projects. And true, Henri, we ddidn't have enough Nut Cases before you should up. Drunk again, I see from your typing.. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm .....specialising in teaching physics to engineers and mathematicians.... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A change of speed of light | mitchgrav@hotmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 31 | April 9th 08 02:21 AM |
| Speed of Light can Change speeds? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | June 27th 07 05:12 PM |
| Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 19 | March 4th 05 01:11 AM |
| Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 18 | March 4th 05 01:11 AM |
| Does light's frequency change from a flashlight that's moving at Near Light Speed? | Peter K. | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | July 3rd 04 11:15 PM |