A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

why in relativity acceleration and gravity are suposely the same?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
█▐▄▐▄▐▄▌█▀█▀█▐▐▬▌
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default why in relativity acceleration and gravity are suposely the same?

but this is impossible man

hoe could thay know that gravity and acceleration is tha same

they couldnt,

becus even when thay call gravity for constant, she is
not constant at all, but difrent, depending on tha
location of gravity, near to earth surface or near tha
empty space surface

she is not 9.81 everywhere at all

and she is imposible to be measured accurately

then acceleration,

they impossible could knew that acceleration is similar
ta gravity, becus you never push constantly in order ta
have constant acceleration, but you have 3rd, 4rth and
many other harmonics componnets of acceleration

this is crazzy to claim that gravity is acceleration

there are and been no evidences that gravity is only
second order, this is only an ugly approximation becus
thay dont have nor know any better

that was and is that tha sky and ocean are tha same
becus that both appears blue seen from outer space

this is crazy,

why they dont callback their nobels allocated on false
premises wrong judgesments?
Ads
  #2  
Old February 18th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Johnnie In The Billows
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 158
Default why in relativity acceleration and gravity are suposely the same?

On Feb 17, 12:44*pm, "█▐▄▐▄▐▄▌█▀█▀█▐▐▬ " wrote:
but this is impossible man

hoe could thay know that gravity and acceleration is tha same

they couldnt,

becus even when thay call gravity for constant, she is
not constant at all, but difrent, depending on tha
location of gravity, near to earth surface or near tha
empty space surface

she is not 9.81 everywhere at all

and she is imposible to be measured accurately

then acceleration,

they impossible could knew that acceleration is similar
ta gravity, becus you never push constantly in order ta
have constant acceleration, but you have 3rd, 4rth and
many other harmonics componnets of acceleration

this is crazzy to claim that gravity is acceleration


Gravity is in fact a cartload of turnips.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehteizq The Theory of Relativity 1 November 29th 04 06:24 PM
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehteizq Physics - New Theories 0 November 28th 04 03:48 PM
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehtonaq The Theory of Relativity 0 October 26th 04 02:23 PM
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehtonaq Physics - New Theories 0 October 26th 04 02:19 PM
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehtonaq Physics - General (alternative forum) 0 October 26th 04 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Counseling - Buy Anything On eBay - Pay Day Loans - Desktop Computers - eHarmony Promotional Code