A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

quantum gravity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Thomas Heger[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default quantum gravity

Hi Ng
an other dodgy addition to my modell.
Qoute from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
"Some question the analogy which motivates the introduction of the graviton.
Unlike the other forces, gravitation plays a special role in general
relativity in defining the spacetime in which events take place. Because it
does not depend on a particular spacetime background, general relativity is
said to be background independent. In contrast, the Standard Model is not
background independent. In other words, general relativity and the standard
model are incompatible. A theory of quantum gravity is needed in order to
reconcile these differences. "
In my model gravity is the geometry of spacetime. period.
Masses are inscripted into spacetime in a certain manner as material objects
(serving as background). Same are fields a property of excitated spacetime.
But gravity is not modeled as interaction of material objects. Its the other
way round. Space is what a material object makes out of spacetime. An object
defines space. Time is perpendicular to that. So any object is treated as in
rest. Since objects are treated as kind of interference patterns of
influences of events and space as region where this is stable, there is a
relation between matter and space. But this picture is not of a rotating
kind. Since there are no interactions and no rotations there is no need to
assumne quanta.

Thomas Heger


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity 114: Quantum Gravity-Electromagnetics Via Lotka-Volterra-Super-Brownian Equations and Probable Influence/Causation (PI) OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 April 6th 07 03:08 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.6: Incredible Conformity in Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 January 22nd 07 04:03 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity OsherD Physics - General Discussion 2 January 21st 07 08:21 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.4: Adding Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 January 20th 07 08:12 PM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 11.0: Resurrection of Niels Bohr's Model for Quantum Gravity NILS BÖRJESSON Physics - General Discussion 0 August 21st 06 09:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Secured Loans - Credit Card Consolidation - Free Mmorpg - Debt Consolidation - Credit Cards