![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: gravity, quantum |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Ng
an other dodgy addition to my modell. Qoute from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton "Some question the analogy which motivates the introduction of the graviton. Unlike the other forces, gravitation plays a special role in general relativity in defining the spacetime in which events take place. Because it does not depend on a particular spacetime background, general relativity is said to be background independent. In contrast, the Standard Model is not background independent. In other words, general relativity and the standard model are incompatible. A theory of quantum gravity is needed in order to reconcile these differences. " In my model gravity is the geometry of spacetime. period. Masses are inscripted into spacetime in a certain manner as material objects (serving as background). Same are fields a property of excitated spacetime. But gravity is not modeled as interaction of material objects. Its the other way round. Space is what a material object makes out of spacetime. An object defines space. Time is perpendicular to that. So any object is treated as in rest. Since objects are treated as kind of interference patterns of influences of events and space as region where this is stable, there is a relation between matter and space. But this picture is not of a rotating kind. Since there are no interactions and no rotations there is no need to assumne quanta. Thomas Heger |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|