![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: particles |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi NG
I have some ideas about particles as addition to my strange modell. If you describe a particle as excitation and the em-field as excitation of the same structure, then why do particles repell from each other? The hole idea is smooth and continuus, but where do quanta come from? Its mainly the same answer. Particles are modelled as patterns that stay stable in time or, as equivalent, stay at rest in space. But particles are not modelled as continuus in time. The slight difference is, that the pattern stays stable but not the individual particle. Particles in this picture pass right through each other like em-waves. (Those excitations are mainly the same, but in different directions.) The pattern stays stables is illustrating the fact, that particles bounce off each other. It is looking like they repell, but since the are not treated as timely continuus it not the same entity that is repelled. But somehow particles excist and are able to interact. They can interact with each other and with fields. There is a certain rule for this interaction. Its the all or nothing principle of qm. The energy of an entity has to match to an entity that is taking that energy exactly. In this picture of rotation, two entities exchanging energy need at least the same rotation position, what makes exchange only possible after one full round. So if rotation position is important, only after some numbers of rotation its possible to interchange. The rotations build a screw if looked at in time direction. In this picture the distance for a full rotation is a constant. Thomas Heger |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The rotations build a screw if looked at in time direction. In this picture the distance for a full rotation is a constant. sorry, this is wrong. You have to divide the lenght of a full round by omega to get a constant. Thomas Heger |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| P AND Q 2 PARTICLES | Divij Rao | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | August 5th 07 10:21 AM |
| Can supersonic sound create virtual particles and anhilate real particles?? | guskz@hotmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | June 8th 06 03:59 AM |
| one or many particles? | Cyberkatru | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 10 | January 15th 06 04:29 AM |
| one or many particles? | Cyberkatru | Particle Physics | 0 | January 1st 06 08:39 PM |
| Many particles or just one? | Roland Vasco | Particle Physics | 1 | October 19th 03 06:39 PM |