A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags:

particles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Thomas Heger[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default particles

Hi NG
I have some ideas about particles as addition to my strange modell.
If you describe a particle as excitation and the em-field as excitation of
the same structure, then why do particles repell from each other?
The hole idea is smooth and continuus, but where do quanta come from? Its
mainly the same answer.
Particles are modelled as patterns that stay stable in time or, as
equivalent, stay at rest in space. But particles are not modelled as
continuus in time. The slight difference is, that the pattern stays stable
but not the individual particle.
Particles in this picture pass right through each other like em-waves.
(Those excitations are mainly the same, but in different directions.)
The pattern stays stables is illustrating the fact, that particles bounce
off each other. It is looking like they repell, but since the are not
treated as timely continuus it not the same entity that is repelled.
But somehow particles excist and are able to interact. They can interact
with each other and with fields. There is a certain rule for this
interaction. Its the all or nothing principle of qm. The energy of an entity
has to match to an entity that is taking that energy exactly. In this
picture of rotation, two entities exchanging energy need at least the same
rotation position, what makes exchange only possible after one full round.
So if rotation position is important, only after some numbers of rotation
its possible to interchange. The rotations build a screw if looked at in
time direction. In this picture the distance for a full rotation is a
constant.

Thomas Heger


Ads
  #2  
Old February 14th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Thomas Heger[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 468
Default particles


The rotations build a screw if looked at in
time direction. In this picture the distance for a full rotation is a
constant.


sorry, this is wrong. You have to divide the lenght of a full round by omega
to get a constant.

Thomas Heger



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
P AND Q 2 PARTICLES Divij Rao Physics - General Discussion 7 August 5th 07 10:21 AM
Can supersonic sound create virtual particles and anhilate real particles?? guskz@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 2 June 8th 06 03:59 AM
one or many particles? Cyberkatru Current Physics Research (Moderated) 10 January 15th 06 04:29 AM
one or many particles? Cyberkatru Particle Physics 0 January 1st 06 08:39 PM
Many particles or just one? Roland Vasco Particle Physics 1 October 19th 03 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Online Advertising - Mobile Themes Download - 0 Credit Cards - Short Bowel Syndrome - Life Insurance