Androcles wrote:

What is it that you understand about Einstein's third postulate:
"the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time"
it requires to travel from B to A' (in all frames of reference because
Einstein says so) that I don't,

That's an Androcles postulate. Einstein had no A-prime there.
His assertion follows from his two postulates and the
definition of distance.

Do you think altering the theory and attributing your wrong
version to Einstein is going to fool anyone?


--
--Bryan

"Bryan Olson" wrote in message ...
Androcles wrote:

What is it that you understand about Einstein's third postulate:
"the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time"
it requires to travel from B to A' (in all frames of reference because
Einstein says so) that I don't,

That's an Androcles postulate. Einstein had no A-prime there.
His assertion follows from his two postulates and the
definition of distance.

Do you think altering the theory and attributing your wrong
version to Einstein is going to fool anyone?

Answer 1:
Yes he does.
Answer 2:
No he does not, but he has no way back.

It does not make any difference, and, given his notorious
dishonesty, you will never know :-)

Dirk Vdm

"Bryan Olson" wrote in message
...
| Androcles wrote:
|
| What is it that you understand about Einstein's third postulate:
| "the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time"
| it requires to travel from B to A' (in all frames of reference because
| Einstein says so) that I don't,
|
| That's an Androcles postulate.

****ing liar, Einstein wrote every word I put in single quotes.
What is it that you understand about Einstein's third postulate:
"the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time"
it requires to travel from B to A' (in all frames of reference because
Einstein says so) that I don't, you useless lying bigot?