A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , ,

why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein forhis relativity?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
compiz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein forhis relativity?

please understand this for me

somthin is blatant fishy here

i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,

tha leaders of the leaders

we dont have time for spectators

why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?
Ads
  #2  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?

"compiz" wrote in message
...
please understand this for me
somthin is blatant fishy here
i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,
tha leaders of the leaders
we dont have time for spectators
why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?


he already has a Nobel prize .. why give him another (posthumously) .. and
why your obsession with Nobel prizes. Do you think the lack of one for AE
somehow casts doubt on SR? The worth of a theory is not based on whether
someone involved in it gets a Nobel prize or not.


  #3  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
compiz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einsteinfor his relativity?

On Feb 4, 11:46 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

please understand this for me
somthin is blatant fishy here
i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,
tha leaders of the leaders
we dont have time for spectators
why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?


he already has a Nobel prize ..


this is not tha same

you cannot compare an electric system nobel to
a relativity nobel

a relativity nobel is much more than that

why give him another (posthumously) .. and
why your obsession with Nobel prizes. Do you think the lack of one for AE
somehow casts doubt on SR? The worth of a theory is not based on whether
someone involved in it gets a Nobel prize or not.


tell you, somthin is very fishy here

seems that tha fat rats know that relaticity is fishy,
but thay are afraid for their jobs
  #4  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,691
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einsteinfor his relativity?

On Feb 4, 4:12*pm, compiz wrote:
please understand this for me

somthin is blatant fishy here

i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,

tha leaders of the leaders

we dont have time for spectators

why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?


1. Nobels aren't given to dead people.
2. What would he do with the prize money?
3. Who would give the Nobel lecture at Stockholm?
  #5  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?

"compiz" wrote in message
...

You are a troll .. no more food for you.



  #6  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
compiz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einsteinfor his relativity?

On Feb 5, 12:14 am, PD wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:12 pm, compiz wrote:

please understand this for me


somthin is blatant fishy here


i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,


tha leaders of the leaders


we dont have time for spectators


why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?


1. Nobels aren't given to dead people.


most of them are dead anyway

2. What would he do with the prize money?


come on, he has many kids on many
continents i understod, and grandkids

3. Who would give the Nobel lecture at Stockholm?


this can easily be done by one named brian,
brian and somthin
  #7  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,691
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einsteinfor his relativity?

On Feb 4, 5:27*pm, compiz wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:14 am, PD wrote:





On Feb 4, 4:12 pm, compiz wrote:


please understand this for me


somthin is blatant fishy here


i saw many people being nobelized in absentia,


tha leaders of the leaders


we dont have time for spectators


why still today, as we speek, they still dont
nobelize Einstein for his relativity?


1. Nobels aren't given to dead people.


most of them are dead anyway


Not at the time they were given, no.


2. What would he do with the prize money?


come on, he has many kids on many
continents i understod, and grandkids

3. Who would give the Nobel lecture at Stockholm?


this can easily be done by one named brian,
brian and somthin-


This would be against Stockholm policy that the award-winner gives the
address himself/herself. Sorry, your motion to the court has been
denied. Case adjourned. NEXT!

PD
  #8  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
compiz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einsteinfor his relativity?

On Feb 5, 12:24 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

You are a troll .. no more food for you.


you cannot be that unsuspicious,

not sensing that somthin is really fishy with relativity
  #9  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?

"compiz" wrote in message
...

Do not feed the compiz troll


  #10  
Old February 4th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default why still today, as we speek, they still dont nobelize Einstein for his relativity?

"compiz" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 12:24 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

You are a troll .. no more food for you.


you cannot be that unsuspicious,
not sensing that somthin is really fishy with relativity


If you understood it, you would know there is not .. as you don't understand
it, and don't want to, then you are not in a position to comment.

Nothing more you have to say of the subject is worth replying to.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I know something........that you dont know. Huang Physics - General Discussion 7 January 3rd 08 11:01 AM
people dont understand my relativity my brother The Theory of Relativity 0 July 10th 07 08:16 PM
What we Still dont know LivePhysics Physics - General (alternative forum) 0 April 17th 07 06:06 PM
Dont drop that Dont park there . tj Frazir Physics - General Discussion 1 September 1st 04 05:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Card Consolidation - CNC - Payday Loans - IKA Lab Equipment - Online Loans