On Feb 5, 12:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

On Feb 4, 11:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message
...
this is easy, i hope
No .. its not
you do alot a mistakes here, i hope

You are talking complete nonsense

[snip rest of post, as I make the same response to each of your bits of
nonsense]

everybody can see, i hope

that you need a speed of light at
least twice as high as speed of light,
in order to observe tha effects causated
by an ordinary nominal speed of light

"compiz" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 12:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

On Feb 4, 11:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message
...
this is easy, i hope
No .. its not
you do alot a mistakes here, i hope

You are talking complete nonsense

[snip rest of post, as I make the same response to each of your bits of
nonsense]

everybody can see, i hope

... that you are an idiot. Go away troll.

On Feb 5, 1:13 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...



On Feb 5, 12:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

On Feb 4, 11:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message
...
this is easy, i hope
No .. its not
you do alot a mistakes here, i hope

You are talking complete nonsense

[snip rest of post, as I make the same response to each of your bits of
nonsense]

everybody can see, i hope

.. that you are an idiot. Go away troll.


what is your obsession insulting people

i think i know why

i couch you again wrong

you want ta observe tha effects of
motion near speed of light with tha
same nominal speed of light

which is forbidden by simultaneity
principle and many other principles
as well

wahahahahah, thanks

"compiz" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 1:13 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...



On Feb 5, 12:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message

...

On Feb 4, 11:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message
...
this is easy, i hope
No .. its not
you do alot a mistakes here, i hope

You are talking complete nonsense

[snip rest of post, as I make the same response to each of your bits
of
nonsense]

everybody can see, i hope

.. that you are an idiot. Go away troll.


what is your obsession insulting people

You are an idiot. Go away troll.

"compiz" wrote in message
...


harry wrote:
"compiz" wrote in message
...
[...]
but seeing a relativity length contraction makes
apparently no any sense, namely because the
speed of light limitations

??? I'm afraid that that argument needs some development. :-)

this is easy, i hope

we need a much highr speed than speed of light
in order for us to observe tha deformation of done
on an object traveling close ta speed of light

but thay pretend that we dont have such a speed
much higher than speed of light

consequently, they never can prove empirically that
that object experience anything at all at that speed

Hmm... so many spelling errors?? - obviously you're just trolling AND
telling us. :-)
Good day!
Harald