On Feb 6, 10:44 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

I have no prejudice or hatred against anyone. shrug

yes .. you do

What is your evidence that is beyond all doubt?

However, your
worship of Einstein blinds you from seeing what Einstein actually
was.

I do not worship anyone

Your puny actions show very conclusively that you worship Einstein.

Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug

Unlikely

It appears to be unlikely to you because you worship Einstein, the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. shrug This is a discussion
about physics and not some make-believe philosophic farce. If you are
interested in discussing your idol, you can also become a follower of
the great Reverend Hammond.

On Feb 6, 10:56 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Oh, talking with tears in your eyes again? Just because I don't agree
with you, it does not mean I hate Einstein. All your accusation is a
cheap shot --- rhetorically below the belt. shrug

So .. your accusations against a dead man who was well respected in the
scientific community isn't ..

What accusations? The dead man you worship was a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. shrug

gimmee a break. .

Hell no! You worship a dead man that was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and
a liar.

you're simply jealous of his
success and that you have none.

It makes no sense to be jealous of a dead man who was a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. Your logic is thoroughly twisted beyond any
hope. shrug

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 10:44 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
I have no prejudice or hatred against anyone. shrug
yes .. you do
What is your evidence that is beyond all doubt?

Your posting history

However, your
worship of Einstein blinds you from seeing what Einstein actually
was.
I do not worship anyone
Your puny actions show very conclusively that you worship Einstein.

You are clearly deluded.

Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug
Unlikely
It appears to be unlikely to you because you worship Einstein,

I worship noone and nothing

the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. shrug This is a discussion
about physics

Then stop posting ad hominen attack on Einstein

[snip more crap]

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 10:56 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Oh, talking with tears in your eyes again? Just because I don't agree
with you, it does not mean I hate Einstein. All your accusation is a
cheap shot --- rhetorically below the belt. shrug

So .. your accusations against a dead man who was well respected in the
scientific community isn't ..

What accusations? The dead man you worship was a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. shrug

**** off idiot troll

"JanPB" wrote in message
...
| On Feb 6, 10:08 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
| On Feb 6, 12:01 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
|
| "Koobee Wublee" wrote:
| And which experiment is that?
|
| Experiments showing the wavelength of light from istant starts if
Doppler
| shifte
|
| What experiments again?
|
| That is very debate that all were respectable. However, the one for
| sure that is not respectable was Einstein, the nitwit, the
plagiarist,
| and the liar. shrug
|
| Your prejudice and hatred blind you.
|
| I have no prejudice or hatred against anyone. shrug However, your
| worship of Einstein
|
| Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they "worship
| Einstein". All you do is cheap rhetoric.


This is very true, I don't agree with aetherialists like KW, he's a
nitwit, plagiarist and liar just like Einstein. shrug

Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:01 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

And which experiment is that?
Experiments showing the wavelength of light from istant starts if Doppler
shifte

What experiments again?

Any observation where the spectral lines are shifted.
Which they are to some degree in most observed spectra.
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures wavelength.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

On Feb 7, 2:23 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:

Any observation where the spectral lines are shifted.
Which they are to some degree in most observed spectra.
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures wavelength.

Thanks for bringing up what I want the Jackal to bring up.

These spectral lines only tell the frequency shift. It says nothing
about the speed and the wavelength. As you know, speed = frequency *
wavelength. Thus, the spectral shift does not invalidate Doppler/
Maxwell's model of classical Doppler shift --- with constant
wavelength but varying speed and frequency. However, to out-guess
what the happy professor might respond, you are going to toss in the
null results of the MMX. Well, does it really indicate invariance in
the speed? Could Voigt be wrong with all others plagiarizing from him
(without giving him any credit)?

Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Feb 7, 2:23 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:

Any observation where the spectral lines are shifted.
Which they are to some degree in most observed spectra.
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures wavelength.

Thanks for bringing up what I want the Jackal to bring up.

These spectral lines only tell the frequency shift. It says nothing
about the speed and the wavelength. As you know, speed = frequency *
wavelength. Thus, the spectral shift does not invalidate Doppler/
Maxwell's model of classical Doppler shift --- with constant
wavelength but varying speed and frequency. However, to out-guess
what the happy professor might respond, you are going to toss in the
null results of the MMX. Well, does it really indicate invariance in
the speed? Could Voigt be wrong with all others plagiarizing from him
(without giving him any credit)?

Your out-guess is wrong.

My response is:
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures the wavelength.

lambda = d sin(phi) where d is the grating period.

The spectral lines only tell the wavelength shift.
It says nothing about the speed and the frequency.

It is experimentally proved that wavelength is Doppler shifted.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...
| Koobee Wublee wrote:
| On Feb 7, 2:23 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
|
| Any observation where the spectral lines are shifted.
| Which they are to some degree in most observed spectra.
| A diffraction grating spectrometer measures wavelength.
|
| Thanks for bringing up what I want the Jackal to bring up.
|
| These spectral lines only tell the frequency shift. It says nothing
| about the speed and the wavelength. As you know, speed = frequency *
| wavelength. Thus, the spectral shift does not invalidate Doppler/
| Maxwell's model of classical Doppler shift --- with constant
| wavelength but varying speed and frequency. However, to out-guess
| what the happy professor might respond, you are going to toss in the
| null results of the MMX. Well, does it really indicate invariance in
| the speed? Could Voigt be wrong with all others plagiarizing from him
| (without giving him any credit)?
|
| Your out-guess is wrong.
|
| My response is:
| A diffraction grating spectrometer measures the wavelength.

Nonsense.

|
| lambda = d sin(phi) where d is the grating period.

Then it measures phi, doesn't it?
phi is a function of velocity.

A diffraction grating spectrometer measures the velocity.

| The spectral lines only tell the wavelength shift.
| It says nothing about the speed and the frequency.

Yes it does, the frequency doesn't change.

|
| It is experimentally proved that wavelength is Doppler shifted.

Well yeah, v = lambda * nu.
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures the velocity (experimentally
proven).

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 2:23 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:

Any observation where the spectral lines are shifted.
Which they are to some degree in most observed spectra.
A diffraction grating spectrometer measures wavelength.

Thanks for bringing up what I want the Jackal to bring up.

These spectral lines only tell the frequency shift

Wrong .. when tested with a grating they show wavelength .. really, olearn
some physics

[snip more crap]