Look at the first published "authors" and their "papers", you are in
for a (big) chuckle:

http://www.jgponline.co.cc/

On Jan 31, 7:20*pm, wrote:
Look at the first published "authors" and their "papers", you are in
for a (big) chuckle:

http://www.jgponline.co.cc/

xxein: On first glance it looks the same as the mumbo-jumbo offered
by the standard archives. One is an opinion relative to the consensus
and one is not. But the consensus is just the present opinion. It
doesn't prove anything is "right".

"xxein" wrote in message
...
On Jan 31, 7:20 pm, wrote:
Look at the first published "authors" and their "papers", you are in
for a (big) chuckle:

http://www.jgponline.co.cc/

xxein: On first glance it looks the same as the mumbo-jumbo offered
by the standard archives. One is an opinion relative to the consensus
and one is not. But the consensus is just the present opinion. It
doesn't prove anything is "right".

More nonsense .. do you ever say anything that makes any sense and is
relevant to the topic ?

wrote in message
...
Look at the first published "authors" and their "papers", you are in
for a (big) chuckle:

http://www.jgponline.co.cc/

"Ajay Sharma
Fundamental Physics Society, His Mercy Campus, Post Box 107GP Shimla
171001HP (Received 02 Nov.2007; Accepted 29 Nov.2007)"

"Ken H. Seto
(Received 01 Nov.2007; Accepted 30 Nov.2007)"
Amazing! How did Ashcat Publishers find them?

Harald