dimensions Threads - Forum Tags by Zoints

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

		Home » Physics Banter forum » Tags
dimensions

Home

Threads tagged with "dimensions"
	Thread / Thread Starter	Last Post	Replies	Views
	what are physical dimensions? by vfiddlestix@aol.com	May 9th 06 by PD	2	25
	dimensions are energy?? by Nishu ( 1 2 3)	April 30th 06 by Bilge	25	67
	Extra "Higher" Dimensions? by Quantum_Ranger ( 1 2)	April 24th 06 by Quantum_Ranger	12	8
	If the universe has multiple dimensions... by Starbles@Earthlink.net ( 1 2)	April 14th 06 by T Wake	13	19
	4th, 5th, and 6th dimensions? by Peter Franks	April 12th 06 by PD	2	9
	4th, 5th, and 6th dimensions? by Peter Franks	April 12th 06 by PD	2	30
	Casimir Force Detector of Extra Dimensions? by Jack Sarfatti	April 6th 06 by Elder Bladderstone	2	9
	Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two? by km	April 2nd 06 by carlip-nospam@physics.ucdavis.edu	6	13
	Szemeredi-Trotter in n dimensions? by Harald Helfgott	March 8th 06 by Harald Helfgott	0	3
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by Bill Hobba	March 3rd 06 by Bill Hobba	2	23
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by Bill Hobba	March 3rd 06 by Bill Hobba	2	24
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by Bill Hobba	March 3rd 06 by Bill Hobba	2	13
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by cbrown@cbrownsystems.com	March 2nd 06 by jollyrogership@yahoo.com	1	19
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by cbrown@cbrownsystems.com	March 2nd 06 by jollyrogership@yahoo.com	1	22
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by cbrown@cbrownsystems.com	March 2nd 06 by jollyrogership@yahoo.com	1	19
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by drelliot@gmail.com	March 2nd 06 by Minus XVII	1	11
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by drelliot@gmail.com	March 2nd 06 by Minus XVII	1	13
	SCIENTIFIC AMAERICAN forgets to mention MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY in their latest issue on TIME. They're stuck in 1969 by drelliot@gmail.com	March 2nd 06 by Minus XVII	1	19
	3 time dimensions by Dirk Bruere	February 23rd 06 by Max	1	6
	Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com by vanep@cox.net	February 20th 06 by vanep@cox.net	3	10
	Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com by vanep@cox.net	February 20th 06 by vanep@cox.net	2	12
	Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com by vanep@cox.net	February 20th 06 by vanep@cox.net	0	10
	Uniting Quatumn Entanglement (Action at A Distance) and Relativity--Moving Dimensions Theory by drelliot@gmail.com	February 18th 06 by Bill Hobba	1	20
	Uniting Quatumn Entanglement (Action at A Distance) and Relativity--Moving Dimensions Theory by drelliot@gmail.com	February 18th 06 by Bill Hobba	1	6
	New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory by drelliot@gmail.com	February 16th 06 by rbcc	4	9
	New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory by drelliot@gmail.com	February 16th 06 by rbcc	4	13
	Planck length calculated assuming D3 dimensions - would it be larger? by stargene@sbcglobal.net	February 15th 06 by stargene@sbcglobal.net	0	0
	MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions by drelliot@gmail.com	February 14th 06 by Immortalist	2	8
	MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions by drelliot@gmail.com	February 14th 06 by Immortalist	2	12
	Planck length calculated assuming D 3 dimensions - would it be larger? by teds@intex.com	February 13th 06 by Robert Low	4	8

Page 11 of 25

« First

Last »

[Main Cloud]

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.