A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » String Theory (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Susskind on 'variation in Planck length'?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 10th 06 posted to sci.physics.strings
stargene@sbcglobal.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Susskind on 'variation in Planck length'?

In "Black Holes, Information and the String Theory Revolution"
by Leonard Susskind and James Lindesay, the authors give,
(Ch. 15: Entropy of Strings and Black Holes, pg. 170):

"The string and Planck length scales are related by
g^2* (l_s)^D-2 = (l_p)^D-2 (15.0.23) "

They then find the consequences of varying g while keeping
string length l_s fixed, saying, "This implies that the Planck
length varies." [D is dimensionality of the system, g is the
dimensionless string coupling constant, and l_p is the Planck
length.]

Variation of g and l_s seems pretty standard in such studies,
but the implication of variation of l_p, the Planck length, struck
me as a surprising statement in mainstream physics, given
that

l_p = (hbar*G / c^3)^.5

IF the authors are actually suggesting that the Planck length
might vary under certain conditions in our universe, they are
also suggesting changes in one or more of the 'constants' on
the right hand side of the above equation. Unfortunately, they
do not further develop this statement in the book, as far as I
can see.

Is my interpretation correct? Have some authors posited actual
variation in l_p?
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Susskind on 'variation in Planck length'? stargene@sbcglobal.net Current Physics Research (Moderated) 3 August 12th 06 05:32 AM
Planck length calculated assuming D 3 dimensions - would it be larger? teds@intex.com Current Physics Research (Moderated) 4 February 13th 06 11:36 PM
Planck length moving at 90 percent of the speed of light Spaceman Physics - General Discussion 4 January 28th 06 06:49 PM
Who invented the length of Planck? alejandro.rivero Current Physics Research (Moderated) 2 February 24th 04 12:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Free Advertising - Property Search - Currency Converter - Send Money Online